This article presents a discourse analytic examination of the ways that adolescent boys (ages 12–15) use irony to construct and resist hetero-normative forms of masculinity in social interaction. While there is a glut of macro-level analyses of irony and pastiche at the broader cultural level (in media, advertisements, etc.), there is a paucity of research detailing how “ordinary” men use irony at the level of the interpersonal. The present paper focuses on how several varieties of irony function in group conversations among adolescent boys, with particular attention given to ways that irony is instrumental in allowing the boys to simultaneously articulate and partly deny certain masculine positions. The findings are meant to be interpreted within a critical, sociopolitical context that is concerned with how the performance of certain types of masculine subjectivities becomes strategically useful in the overall survivability and adaptability of hegemonic masculinity.
AlbrechtT.L.JohnsonG.M.WaltherJ.B. (1993). Understanding communication processes in focus groups. In MorganD.L. (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 51–64). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (HolquistM., Editor; EmersonC. & HolquistM., Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3.
BambergM. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 335–342.
4.
BambergM. (1999). Talk and what talk is about: The development of form and content in discourse practices. Human Development, 42(5), 247–252.
5.
BambergM. (in press-a). Positioning with Davie Hogan—Stories, tellings, and identities. In DaiuteC. & LightfootC. (Eds.), Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society. London: Sage.
6.
BambergM. (in press-b). “I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn't really care less about her anyway.” Form and functions of “slut-bashing” in male identity constructions in 15-year-olds. Human Development.
7.
BenwellB. (2002). Is there anything “new” about these lads? The textual and visual construction of masculinity in men's magazines. In LitosselitiL. & Sunder-LandJ. (Eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis (pp. 149–173). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
8.
BenwellB. (2004). Ironic discourse: Evasive masculinity in men's lifestyle magazines. Men and Masculinities, 7(1), 3–21.
9.
BilligM. (1991). Ideology and opinions. London: Sage.
10.
BilligM.CondorS.EdwardsD.GaneM.MiddletonD., & RadleyA. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
11.
ButlerJ. (1990). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In CaseS-E. (Ed.), Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theatre (pp. 270–282). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
12.
CliftR. (1999). Irony in conversation. Language in Society, 28, 523–553.
13.
ConnellR.W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
DenzinN.K., & LincolnY.S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DewsS.KaplanJ., & WinnerE. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes, 19, 347–367.
16.
EckertP. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
EckertP. (1994). Entering the heterosexual marketplace: Identities of subordination as a developmental imperative. Working Papers on Learning and Identity No 2. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.
EriksonE.H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York: Norton.
20.
FroshS.PhoenixA., & PattmanR. (2002). Young masculinities: Understanding boys in contemporary society. London: Palgrave.
21.
GioraR. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19, 239–264.
22.
GoughB. (2001). “Biting your tongue”: Negotiating masculinities in contemporary Britain. Journal of Gender Studies, 10(2), 169–185.
23.
GriceP.H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In ColeP. & MorganJ. (Eds.), Speech acts: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.
24.
HaimanJ. (1998). Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of language. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
25.
HeritageJ. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In AtkinsonJ.M. & HeritageJ. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HutchbyI. (2001). “Oh,” irony and sequential ambiguity in arguments. Discourse & Society, 12(2), 123–141.
KorobovN. (2002). “Narratives” as drawn-upon and “narratives” as occasioned: Challenges in reconciling an “emic” and “etic” analysis. Narrative Inquiry, 12(2), 413–422.
29.
KorobovN. (2004). Inoculating against prejudice: A discursive approach to homophobia and sexism in adolescent male talk. Psychology of Men & Masculinity5(2), 178–189.
30.
KorobovN. & BambergM. (2004). Positioning a “mature” self in interactive practices: How adolescent males negotiate “physical attraction” in group talk. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 471–492.
LongmanD.L., & GraesserA.C. (1988). Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 11, 35–60.
33.
Mac an GhailM. (2000). “New times” in an old country: Emerging black gay identities and (hetero) sexual discontents. In LeskoN. (Ed.), Masculinities at school (pp. 163–185). London: Sage.
34.
MacCobyE.E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
35.
MillsS. (2003). Caught between sexism, anti-sexism and “political correctness”: Feminist women's negotiations with naming practices. Discourse & Society, 14(1), 87–110.
36.
MorganD.L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
PiagetJ. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.
39.
PleckJ. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm. An update. In LevantR.F. & PollackW.S. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.
40.
PotterJ. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction. London: Sage.
41.
PotterJ., & WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
42.
SchegloffE.A.JeffersonG., & SacksH. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
43.
SilvermanD. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talk, text, and interaction. London: Sage.
44.
SpeerS., & PotterJ. (2000). The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims. Discourse & Society, 11(4), 543–572.
45.
ThorneA. (2000). Personal memory telling and personality development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 45–56.
46.
ThorneB. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
