Members of 68 families with allegedly violent wives were studied to explore the nature of women's violence at home and to ascertain whether wives assault their spouses in self-defense. Accounts of children and the wives' mothers were contrasted with husbands' and wives' accounts to ensure a high degree of accuracy of the assessment of the problem and to test the validity of the spouses' accounts. Qualitative analysis revealed that the credibility of the wives' accounts of violence was highly questionable and a justification of self-defense for female-to-male violence was unfounded in a majority of cases.
AdlerC. (1992). Violence, gender and social change. International Social Science Journal, 132, 267–276.
2.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.
3.
BlakieN. (2000). Designing social research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
BradfieldR. (1998). Is near enough good enough? Why isn't self-defense appropriate for the battered woman?Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law, 5, 71–85.
5.
CarradoM.GeorgeM.J.LoxamE.JonesL., & TemplarD. (1996). Aggression in British heterosexual relationships. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 401–415.
6.
CookP.W. (1997). Abused men: The hidden victims of domestic violence. London: Praeger.
GeorgeM.J. (1992). A preliminary investigation of instrumental domestic abuse of men. House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee. Memorandum of Evidence No. 14, London: HMSO.
13.
GeorgeM.J. (1994). Riding the donkey backwards: Men as the unacceptable victims of marital violence. The Journal of Men's Studies, 3, 137–159.
14.
GeorgeM.J. (1999). A victimization survey of female perpetrated assaults in the United Kingdom. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 67–79.
15.
GoldbergW.G., & TomlanovichM.C. (1984). Domestic violence victims in the emergency department: New findings. Journal of the American Medical Association, 251, 3259–3264.
16.
GregorashL. (1993). An explorative study of men who have been abused by their wives. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Calgary.
17.
HarrisonJ. (1986, May 24). Would you batter your husband?Woman's Own, 34–35.
18.
HeiderW. (1995). Geschlechtsperspectiven in Kriminalrecht. Marburg: Selbstverlag.
19.
HopkinsA., & McGregorH. (1991). Working for change: The movement against domestic violence. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
20.
HubbleG. (1999). Self-defense and domestic violence: A reply to Bradfield. Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law, 6, 51–56.
21.
IslandD., & LetellierP. (1991). Men who beat the men who love them. Birminghamton, NY: Hawthorne.
22.
KurzD. (1993). Physical assaults by husbands. A major social problem. In GellesR.J. & LosekeD.R. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 88–103). Newbury Park: Sage.
23.
LazarusS., & McCarthyK. (1990). Panacea for social issues: Depoliticisation of domestic violence. Legal Service Bulletin, 15, 30–31.
24.
LetellierP. (1994). Gay and bi-sexual domestic violence victimization. Challenges to feminist theory and responses to violence. Violence and Victims, 9, 95–106.
25.
LockhartL.L.WhiteB.CausbyV., & IsaacA. (1994). Letting out the secret: Violence in lesbian relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 469–493.
26.
McGregorH. (1990). Conceptualizing male violence against female partners: Political implications of therapeutic responses. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 11, 2, 65–70.
27.
McLeodM. (1984). Women against men: An examination of domestic violence based on the analysis of official data and national victimization data. Justice Quarterly, 1(2), 171–193.
28.
McNeelyR.L., & Robinson-SimpsonG. (1987). The truth about domestic violence: A reply to Saunders. Social Work, 33, 184–188.
OSW—Office of the Status of Women. (1991). National agenda for women—Implementation report. Canberra: AGPS.
31.
OSW—Office of the Status of Women (1992). National strategies on violence against women. Canberra: AGPS.
32.
PearsonP. (1997a, September). Women behaving badly. Saturday Night, 90–100.
33.
PearsonP. (1997b). When she was bad: Women and the myth of innocence. Toronto: Random House.
34.
RenzettiC.M. (1992). Violent betrayal. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
SarantakosS. (1984). Living together in Australia. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
36.
SarantakosS. (1992). Cohabitation in transition. Sydney: Keon.
37.
SarantakosS. (1996). Husband abuse: A social problem? Paper presented at the Conference of the Sociological Association of Australia and New Zealand. Hobart.
38.
SarantakosS. (1997). Husband abuse. The views of parents and children. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Sociological Association of Australia and New Zealand. Wollongong.
39.
SarantakosS. (1998a). Social research. London: Macmillan.
40.
SarantakosS. (1998b). Husband abuse as self-defense. Paper presented at the International Congress of Sociology, Montreal, Canada.
41.
SarantakosS. (1999). Husband abuse. Fact or fiction?Australian Journal of Social Issues, 34(3), 231–252.
42.
ScanzoniJ. (1978). Sex roles, women's work and marital conflict. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
43.
SchilitR.LieG., & MontagneM. (1990). Substance abuse as a correlate of violence in intimate lesbian relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 19, 51–66.
44.
SchofieldJ. W. (1993). Increasing the generalisability of qualitative research. In HammersleyM. (Ed), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice (pp. 200–225). London: Sage.
45.
SchulmanM. (1979). A survey of spousal violence against women in Kentucky. Washington, DC: Govt. Printing Office.
46.
Seth-PurdieR. (1996). Domestic violence: In search of well-informed policy. Department of the Parliamentary Library, Parliamentary Research Service, Commonwealth of Australia.
SommerR. (1994). Male and female partner abuse: Testing a diathesis-stress model. Unpublished thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
49.
SorensonS.B., & TellesC.A. (1991). Self-reports of spousal violence in a Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white population. Violence and Victims, 6, 3–15.
50.
StetsJ.E., & StrausM.A. (1990). The marriage license as hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabiting and married couples. In StrausM.A. & GellesR.J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 227–244). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
51.
StittS., & MacKlinA. (1995). Battered husbands: The hidden victims of domestic violence. Paper presented at the 27th BSA Medical Sociology Conference. University of York. September.
52.
StrausM.A. (1993). Husband abuse and the woman offender are important problems. In GellesR.J. & LosekeD.R. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 67–87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Struckman-JohnsonC. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–241.
54.
ThomasD. (1993). Not guilty: In defense of the modern man. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
55.
TjadenP.G., & ToennesN. (1997). The prevalence and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. American Society of Criminology 49th Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA. (Also in: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/njj/pubs-sum/172837.htm)
56.
TyreeA., & MaloneJ. (1991). How can it be that wives hit husbands as much as husbands hit wives and none of us know it? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association.
57.
WalkerG. (1990). Family violence and the women's movement: The conceptual politics of struggle. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
