Virtually no research has explored men's phenomenological experiences with sexually explicit material. The present research examined men's self-reports regarding how they felt reading Playboy magazine had affected them and influenced their conceptualization of and interactions with women. Qualitative analysis of 22 Playboy readers' self-reports indicated that first exposure to Playboy is a very memorable event, that Playboy served as a source of sex-related information, and that Playboy contributed to the development of a sexual self-concept. Playboy readers' attitudes toward Playmates lacked a misogynistic component. The possible influence of Playboy as a means of socializing boys into men is noted.
AndersenB.L.CyranowskiJ.C., & EspindleD. (1999). Men's sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 645–661.
2.
BarberN. (1998a). Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in American women: Different masculine and feminine ideals. Journal of Psychology, 132, 87–94.
3.
BarberN. (1998b). The slender ideal and eating disorders: An interdisciplinary “telescope” model. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 23, 295–307.
4.
BegganJ.K., & AllisonS.T. (2001a). The Playboy rabbit is soft, furry, and cute: Is this really the symbol of masculine dominance of women?The Journal of Men's Studies, 9, 341–370.
5.
BegganJ.K., & AllisonS.T. (2001b). What do Playboy Playmates want? Implications of expressed preferences in the construction of the “unfinished” masculine identity. The Journal of Men's Studies, 10, 1–38.
6.
BegganJ.K., & AllisonS.T. (2002). The Playboy Playmate paradox: The case against the objectification of women. In GagneP. & TewksburyR. (Eds.), Gendered sexualities (Vol. 6; pp. 103–156). London: Elsevier Sciences, Ltd.
7.
BegganJ.K.GagnéP., & AllisonS.T. (2000). An analysis of stereotype refutation in Playboy by an editorial voice: The advisor hypothesis. The Journal of Men's Studies, 9, 1–21.
8.
BogaertA.F.TurkovichD.A., & HaferC.L. (1993). A content analysis of Playboy centrefolds from 1953 through 1990: Changes in explicitness, objectification, and model's age. The Journal of Sex Research, 30, 135–139.
9.
BoyntonP.M. (1999). “Is that supposed to be sexy?” Women discuss women in “top shelf” magazines. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 449–461.
10.
BrodH. (1988). Pornography and the alienation of male sexuality. Social Theory and Practice, 14, 265–284.
11.
BrooksG.R. (1995). The centerfold syndrome. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
BryantJ., & BrownD. (1989). Uses of pornography. In ZillmanD. & BryantJ. (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 22–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
14.
CoxH. (1965). The secular city. New York: Macmillan.
15.
DavisC.M., & BausermanR. (1993). Exposure to sexually explicit materials: An attitude change perspective. Annual Review of Sex Research, 4, 121–209.
16.
D'EmilioJ., & FreedmanE.B. (1997). Intimate matters: A history of sexuality in America (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
DuranR.L., & PrusankD.T. (1997). Relational themes in men's and women's popular nonfiction magazine articles. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 165–189.
18.
DworkinA. (1988). Letters from a war zone: Writings, 1976–1987. New York: Dutton.
19.
EhrenreichB. (1983). The hearts of men: American dreams and the flight from commitment. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
20.
GlickP., & FiskeS.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
21.
HarrisD.K.FineG.A., & HoodT.C. (1992). The aging of desire: Playboy centerfolds and the graying of America; A research note. Journal of Aging Studies, 6, 301–306.
22.
KallenR.A., & BrooksR.D. (1974). The playmate of the month: Naked but nice. Journal of Popular Culture, 8, 328–336.
23.
KimmelM.S. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. New York: The Free Press.
24.
KnufJ. (1994). Reading Playboy as ethnography: Lexical indices of some male naive gender theories. Semiotica, 98, 301–339.
25.
LawrenceK., & HeroldE.S. (1988). Women's attitudes toward and experience with sexually explicit materials. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 161–169.
26.
LevantR.F. (1997). The masculinity crisis. The Journal of Men's Studies, 5, 221–231.
27.
LindemanA. K. (1999). Quest for ideal weight: Costs and consequences. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31, 1135–1140.
28.
LinzD., & MalamuthN. (1993). Pornography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
MayR. (1969). Love and will. New York: Norton.
30.
NisbettR.E., & WilsonT.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
31.
OwenP.R., & Laurel-SellerE. (2000). Weight and shape ideals: Thin is dangerously in. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 979–990.
32.
PleckJ.H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In LevantR. F. & PollackW. S. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.
33.
RichM., & CashT.F. (1993). The American image of beauty: Media representations of hair color for four decades. Sex Roles, 29, 113–124.
34.
RossiL.D. (1975). The whore vs. the girl-next-door: Stereotypes of woman in Playboy, Penthouse, and Oui. Journal of Popular Culture, 9, 90–94.
SinghD. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.
37.
SladeJ.W. (2001). Pornography and sexual representation: A reference guide. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
38.
SpitzerB.L.HendersonK.A., & ZivianM.T. (1999). Gender differences in population versus media body sizes: A comparison over four decades. Sex Roles, 40, 545–565.
39.
SteinemG. (1983). I was a Playboy bunny. In SteinemG. (Ed.), Outrageous acts and everyday rebellions (pp. 29–69). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
40.
TaleseG. (1980). Thy neighbor's wife. New York: Doubleday.
41.
WisemanC.V.GrayJ.J.MosimannJ.E., & AhrensA.H. (1992). Cultural expectations of thinness in women: An update. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 11, 85–89.
