Although researchers have begun to show critical interest in men as gendered beings, theoretical models capable of cultivating alternative, more psychologically and socially adaptive patterns of male development are lacking. A small purposively drawn sample of eight profeminist men, along with one father's rights activist, were asked to recount their personal experiences involving gender issues during unstructured interviews. Intensive qualitative analysis was used to interpret and organize the data into groups of related constructs, which were refined, organized, and reorganized according to the emerging schematic model. This model illustrates the complex developmental process of personal change and social transformation experienced by the nine men interviewed. Analysis revealed that embracing gender-related conflict in the context of a firm yet compassionate and synergistic community was key to congruent profeminist experience. The implications of the model are discussed in relation to current theory on masculinities and men's role in feminism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdairM. (1992). Will the real men's movement please stand up? In HaganK. L. (Ed.), Women respond to the men's movement: A feminist collection (pp. 55–66). San Francisco: Harper.
2.
AlderC., & WundersitzJ. (1994). Family group conferencing in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
3.
AugustE. R. (1994). The new men's studies: A selected and annotated interdisciplinary bibliography (2nd ed.). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
4.
BergmanS. J. (1995). Men's psychological development: A relational perspective. In LevantR.F. & PollackW. S. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 68–90). New York: Harper Collins.
5.
BergmanS. J., & SurreyJ. L. (1997). The woman-man relationship: Impasses and possibilities. In JordanJ. V. (Ed.), Women's growth in diversity: More writings from the Stone Center (pp. 260–287). New York: Guilford.
BrownL. S. (1992). Essential lies: A dystopian vision of the mythopoetic men's movement. In HaganK. L. (Ed.), Women respond to the men's movement: A feminist collection (pp. 93–100). San Francisco: Harper.
8.
BrownM., & PolkK. (1996). Taking the fear of crime seriously: The Tasmanian approach to community crime prevention. Crime & Delinquency, 42, 398–420.
9.
BurfordG., & PennellJ. (1995). Family group decision-making: New roles for “old” partners in resolving family violence. Unpublished manuscript, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada, School of Social Work.
10.
ClatterbaughK. (1997). Contemporary perspectives on masculinity: Men, women, and politics in modern society (2nd ed.) Boulder, CO: Westview.
11.
'97 Fall campaign better than ever. (1998, Winter). The White Ribbon, 11, 1.
12.
FaludiS. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown.
13.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
14.
GrossmanF. K.PollackW. S.GoldingE. R., & FedeleN. M. (1987). Autonomy and affiliation in the transition to parenthood. Family Relations, 36, 263–269.
15.
GubaE. G., & LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
HaleyJ. O. (1995). Victim-offender mediation: Lessons from the Japanese experience. Mediation Quarterly, 12, 233–248.
17.
HeathS. (1987). Male feminism. In JardineA. & SmithP. (Eds.), Men in feminism (pp. 1–32). New York: Methuen.
18.
JardineA., & SmithP. (Eds.). (1987). Men in feminism. New York: Methuen.
19.
KatzR. (1984). Empowerment and synergy: Towards expanding community healing resources. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 201–225.
20.
KaufmanM. (1993). Cracking the armor: Power, pain and the lives of men. Toronto: Viking.
21.
KaufmanM. (1994). Men, feminism, and men's contradictory experiences of power. In BrodH. & KaufmanM. (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 142–163Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
KrugmanS. (1995). Male development and the transformation of shame. In LevantR. F. & PollackW. S. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 91–126). New York: Harper Collins.
24.
KrukE. (1997). Mediation and conflict resolution: In social work and the human services. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
25.
KupersT. A. (1993). Revisioning men's lives: Gender, intimacy, and power. New York: Guilford Press.
26.
LevantR. F. (1995). Toward the reconstruction of masculinity. In LevantR. F. & PollackW. S. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 229–251). New York: Harper Collins.
27.
LevantR. F., & PollackW. S. (1995). A new psychology of men. New York: Harper Collins.
28.
MarshallT. F. (1995). Restorative justice on trial in Britain. Mediation Quarterly, 12, 217–231.
29.
MessmerH., & OttoH. (1992). Restorative justice on trial: Pitfalls and potentials of victim-offender mediation—international research perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
30.
MiedzianM. (1991). Boys will be boys: Breaking the link between masculinity and violence. New York: Doubleday.
31.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
NobleV. (1992). A helping hand from the guys. In HaganK. L. (Ed.), Women respond to the men's movement: A feminist collection (pp. 101–110). San Francisco: Harper.
33.
PerryL. (1994). Mediation and wife abuse: A review of the literature. Mediation Quarterly, 11, 313–327.
34.
PieckJ. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
PollackW. S. (1990). Men's development and psychotherapy: A psychoanalytic perspective. Psychotherapy, 27, 316–321.
36.
PollackW. S. (1995). No man is an island: Toward a new psychoanalytic psychology of men. In LevantR. F. & PollackW. S. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 33–67). New York: Harper Collins.
37.
PorterD. (Ed.). (1992). Between men and feminism. New York: Routledge.
38.
PrilleltenskyI. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517–535.
39.
RandallM. (1992). “And so she walked over and kissed him…” Robert Bly's men's movement. In HaganK. L. (Ed.), Women respond to the men's movement: A feminist collection (pp. 141–148). San Francisco: Harper.
40.
RifkinJ. (1984). Mediation from a feminist perspective: Promise and problems. Law & Inequality, 2, 493–519.
41.
SmithD. (1978). A peculiar eclipsing: Women's exclusion from man's culture. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 1, 281–296.
42.
SmithP. (1987). Men in feminism; Men and feminist theory. In JardineA., & SmithP. (Eds.), Men in feminism (pp. 33–40). New York; Methuen.
43.
SpenderD. (1981). Men's studies modified: The impact of feminism on the academic discipline. Oxford: Permagon.
44.
StettbacherJ. K. (1993). Making sense of suffering: The healing confrontation with your own past. New York: Meridian.
45.
UmbreitM. S. (1995). The development and impact of victim-offender mediation in the United States. Mediation Quarterly, 12, 263–276.
46.
Van LeeuwenM. S. (1997). Servanthood or soft patriarchy? A Christian feminist looks at the Promise Keepers movement. The Journal of Men's Studies, 5, 233–261.
47.
ClineWelch R. J. (1989). The politics of intimacy: Costs and benefits determining disclosure of intimacy in male-female dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 5–20.
48.
ZehrH. (1995). Justice paradigm shift? Values and visions in the reform process. Mediation Quarterly, 12, 207–216.
