BarilG. L.ElbertN.Mahar-PotterS., & ReavyG. C. (1989). Are androgynous managers really more effective?Group and Organization Studies, 14, 234–249.
2.
BelenkyM.ClinchyB.GoldbergerN., & TaruleJ. (1986). Women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic.
3.
BernS. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
4.
BenhabibS. (1987). The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. In BenhabibS. & CornellD. (Eds.), Feminism as critique (pp. 77–95). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
BhatnagarD. (1988). Professional women in organizations: New paradigms for research and action. Sex Roles, 18, 343–355.
6.
BlakeR. R., & MoutonJ.S. (1978). The new managerial grid. Houston: Gulf.
7.
BrennerO. C.TomkiewiczJ., & ScheinV. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662–669.
8.
BrownS. M. (1979). Male versus female leaders: A comparison of empirical studies. Sex Roles, 5, 595–611.
9.
CannA., & SiegfriedW. D. (1987). Sex stereotypes and the leadership role. Sex Roles, 77, 401–408.
10.
CannA., & SiegfriedW. D. (1990). Gender stereotypes and dimensions of effective leader behavior. Sex Roles, 23, 413–419.
11.
CarrollS. J., & GillenD. (1987). Are the classical management functions useful in describing managerial work?Academy of Management Review, 72, 38–51.
12.
Catalyst. (1986, April). Female management style: Myth and reality. Perspective Series # 36A.
13.
CohenS. (1989, February), Beyond macho: The power of womanly management. Working Woman, 77–83.
14.
DobbinsG. H., & PlatzS. J. (1986). Sex differences in leadership: How real are they?Academy of Management Journal, 77, 118–127.
15.
DonnellS., & HallJ. (1980). Men and women as managers: A significant case of no significant differences. Organizational Dynamics, 8, 60–76.
16.
FiedlerF. E.ChemersM., & MaharL. (1976). Improving leader effectiveness: The leader match. New York: Wiley.
17.
FleishmanE. E. (1973). Twenty years of consideration and structure. In FleishmanE. A. & HuntJ. G. (Eds.), Current developments in the study of leadership (pp. 1–38). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
18.
GrantJ. (1988). Women as managers: What they can offer to organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 56–63.
19.
HardingS. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Press.
20.
HelgesenS. (1990). The female advantage: Women's ways of leading. New York: Doubleday.
21.
JacobsonS. W., & JacquesR. (1989). Beyond androgyny: Future directions for gender research. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meetings, Washington, D.C.
22.
KanterR. M. (1979). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic.
23.
KaplanA. (1979). Clarifying the concept of androgyny: Implications for therapy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 3, 223–230.
LocksleyA., & ColtenM. E. (1979). Psychological androgyny: A case of mistaken identity. Journal of Consulting and Social Psychology, 37, 1017–1031.
26.
LodenM. (1985). Feminine leadership: Or how to succeed in business without being one of the boys. New York: Times Books.
27.
LuthansF. (1988). Successful vs. effective real managers. Academy of Management Executive, 2(2), 127–132.
28.
MottP. E. (1972). The characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
29.
PetersT. (1990, September). The best new managers will listen. Motivate. Support. Isn't that just like a woman?Working Woman, 142–144.
30.
PowellG. N. (1988). Women and men in management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
PowellG. N. (1990). One more time: Do male and female managers differ?Academy of Management Executive, 4(4), 68–75.
32.
PowellG. N., & ButterfieldD. A. (1979). The “good manager:” Masculine or androgynous?Academy of Management Journal, 22, 395–403.
33.
PowellG. N., & ButterfieldD. A. (1984) If “good managers” arc masculine, what arc “bad managers”?Sex Roles, 10, 477–484.
34.
PowellG. N., & ButterfieldD. A. (1989). The “good manager”: Did androgyny fare better in the 1980s?Group and Organization Studies, 14, 216–233.
35.
RogersJ. (1988). New paradigm leadership: Integrating the female ethos. Journal of the National Association of Women Deans, Administrators and Counselors, 5(9), 1–8.
36.
RosenerJ. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119–125.
37.
SargentA. (1981). The androgynous manager. New York: American Management Association Communications (AMACOM).
38.
SargentA. (1983). Women and men working together: Toward androgyny. Training and Development Journal, April: 72–76.
39.
ScheinV. E.MuellerR., & JacobsonC. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among college students. Sex Roles, 20, 103–110.
40.
SpenceJ., & HelmreichR. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
41.
SpenceJ., & HelmreichR. L. (1979). The many faces of androgyny: A reply to Locksley and Colten. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1040.
42.
TrempeJ.RignyA., & HaccounR. (1985). Subordinate satisfaction with male and female managers: Role of perceived supervisory influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 44–47.
43.
WernetteD. (1985). An in-class exercise for teaching gender stratification/mobility. Teaching Newsletter of the American Sociological Association, 10(3), 7–9.