Mobility and safety are the two greatest priorities within any transportation system. Ideally, traffic flow enhancement and crash reductions could occur simultaneously, although their relationship is likely complex. The impact of traffic congestion and flow on road safety requires more empirical evidence to determine the direction and magnitude of the relationship. The study of this relationship is an ideal application for instrumented vehicles and surrogate safety measures (SSMs). The purpose of this paper is to correlate quantitative measures of congestion and flow derived from smartphone-collected GPS data with collision frequency and severity at the network scale. GPS travel data were collected in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, and the sample for this study contained data for more than 4,000 drivers and 20,000 trips. The extracted SSMs, the congestion index (CI), average speed (V), and the coefficient of variation of speed (CVS) were compared with crash data collected over an 11-year period from 2000 to 2010 with the use of Spearman’s correlation coefficient and pairwise Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. The correlations with crash frequency were weak to moderate. CI was shown to be positively correlated with crash frequency, and the relationship to crash severity was found to be nonmonotonous. Higher congestion levels were related to crashes with major injuries, whereas low congestion levels were related to crashes with minor injuries and fatalities. Surprisingly, V was found to be negatively correlated with crash frequency and had no conclusive statistical relationship to crash severity. CVS was positively correlated with crash frequency and statistically related to increased crash severity. Future work will focus on the development of a network screening model that incorporates these SSMs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DiasC., MiskaM., KuwaharaM., and WaritaH.. Relationship Between Congestion and Traffic Accidents on Expressways: An Investigation with Bayesian Belief Networks. In Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of Infrastructure Planning (JSCE), Japan, 2009.
2.
ZhouM., and SisiopikuV. P.. Relationship Between Volume-to-Capacity Ratios and Accident Rates. Transportation Research Record, No. 1581, 1997, pp. 47–52. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1581-06.
3.
NolandR. B., and QuddusM. M.. Congestion and Safety: A Spatial Analysis of London. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 39, No. 7–9, 2005, pp. 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.02.022.
4.
MarchesiniP., and WeijermarsW.. The Relationship Between Road Safety and Congestion on Motorways. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, The Hague, Netherlands, 2010.
5.
WangC., QuddusM. A., and IsonS. G.. Impact of Traffic Congestion on Road Accidents: A Spatial Analysis of the M25 Motorway in England. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2009, pp. 798–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.002.
6.
TaylorM. A. P., WoolleyE., and ZitoR.. Integration of the Global Positioning System and Geographical Information Systems for Traffic Congestion Studies. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 8, No. 1–6, 2000, pp. 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(00)00015-2.
7.
SiouiL., and MorencyC.. Building Congestion Indexes from GPS Data: Demonstration. In Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Transport Research, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013.
8.
TarkoA., DavisG., SaunierN., SayedT., and WashingtonS.. Surrogate Measures of Safety. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009.
9.
LaureshynA., AstromK., and Brundell-FreijK.. From Speed Profile Data to Analysis of Behaviour. IATSS Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2009, pp. 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60247-8.
10.
AlgerholmN., and LahrmannH.. Identification of Hazardous Road Locations on the Basis of Floating Car Data. In Proceedings of the Conference Road Safety in a Globalised and More Sustainable World: Current Issues and Future Challenges, Hasselt, Belgium, International Cooperation in Theories and Concepts in Traffic Safety, Vienna, Austria, 2012.
11.
LeeC., HellingaB., and OzbayK.. Quantifying Effects of Ramp Metering on Freeway Safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, 2006, pp. 279–288.
12.
KockelmanK. M., and KweonY.-J.. Driver Injury Severity: An Application of Ordered Probit Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2002, pp. 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00028-8.
13.
SayedT., ZakiM. H., and AuteyJ.. Automated Safety Diagnosis of Vehicle–Bicycle Interactions Using Computer Vision Analysis. Safety Science, Vol. 59, 2013, pp. 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.05.009.
14.
DingusT. A., KlauerS. G., NealeV. L., PetersenA., LeeS. E., SudweeksJ. D., PerezM. A., HankeyJ., RamseyD. J., GuptaS., BucherC., DoerzaphZ. R., JermelandJ., and KniplingR. R.. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study. Phase II. Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment. Report S-810 593. NHTSA, Washington, D.C., 2006.
15.
YanX., Abdel-AtyM., RadwanE., WangX., and ChilakapatiP.. Validating a Driving Simulator Using Surrogate Safety Measures. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2008, pp. 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.007.
16.
OhC., OhJ.-S., and RitchieS. G.. Real-Time Estimation of Freeway Accident Likelihood. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
17.
GolobT. F., ReckerW. W., and AlvarezV. M.. Freeway Safety as a Function of Traffic Flow. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2004, pp. 933–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2003.09.006.
18.
LeeC., SaccomannoF., and HellingaB.. Analysis of Crash Precursors on Instrumented Freeways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, 2002, pp. 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1784-01.
19.
HerreraJ. C., WorkD. B., HerringR., BanX., JacobsonQ., and BayenA. M.. Evaluation of Traffic Data Obtained via GPS-Enabled Mobile Phones: The Mobile Century Field Experiment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2010, pp. 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.10.006.
20.
D’EsteG. M., ZitoR., and TaylorM. A.. Using GPS to Measure Traffic System Performance. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1999, pp. 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00146.
21.
El FaouziN.-E., LeungH., and KurianA.. Data Fusion in Intelligent Transportation Systems: Progress and Challenges—A Survey. Information Fusion, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2011, pp. 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2010.06.001.
22.
JunJ., OgleJ., and GuenslerR.. Relationships Between Crash Involvement and Temporal–Spatial Driving Behavior Activity Patterns Using GPS Instrumented Vehicle Data. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
23.
WoodwardD., NoginG., KochP., RaczD., GoldszmidtM., and HorvitsE.. Predicting Travel Time Reliability Using Mobile Phone GPS Data. Microsoft Research, Redmond, Wash., 2015.
24.
LiuH. X., and MaW.. A Virtual Vehicle Probe Model for Time-Dependent Travel Time Estimation on Signalized Arterials. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2009, pp. 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2008.05.002.
25.
ErenH., MakinistS., AkinE., and YilmazA.. Estimating Driving Behavior by a Smartphone. In Proceedings of 2012 Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Alcalá de Henares, Spain, 2012, pp. 234–239.
26.
JohnsonD. A., and TrivediM. M.. Driving Style Recognition Using a Smartphone as a Sensor Platform. In Proceedings of 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 1609–1615.
27.
LiY., and McDonaldM.. Link Travel Time Estimation Using Single GPS Equipped Probe Vehicle. In Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Singapore, 2002, pp. 932–937.
28.
AftabuzzamanM.Measuring Traffic Congestion—A Critical Review. In Proceedings of 30th Australasian Transport Research Forum, 2007.
29.
ShiQ., and Abdel-AtyM.. Big Data Applications in Real-Time Traffic Operation and Safety Monitoring and Improvement on Urban Expressways. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 58, 2015, pp. 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.022.
30.
QuddusM. A., WangC., and IsonS. G.. Road Traffic Congestion and Crash Severity: An Econometric Analysis Using Ordered Response Models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 5, 2010, pp. 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000044.
31.
MartinJ.-L.Relationship Between Crash Rate and Hourly Traffic Flow on Interurban Motorways. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, 2002, pp. 619–629.
32.
Abdel-AtyM., and PandeA.. Identifying Crash Propensity Using Specific Traffic Speed Conditions. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2005, pp. 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2004.11.002.
33.
MorenoA. T., and GarciaA.. Use of Speed Profile as Surrogate Measure: Effect of Traffic Calming Devices on Crosstown Road Safety Performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 61, 2013, pp. 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.10.013.
34.
BoonsiripantS.Speed Profile Variation as a Surrogate Measure of Road Safety Based on GPS-Equipped Vehicle Data. PhD dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 2009.
35.
StipancicJ., Miranda-MorenoL., and SaunierN.. The Who and Where of Road Safety: Extracting Surrogate Indicators from Smartphone-Collected GPS Data in Urban Environments. Presented at 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016.
36.
BachmanC.Multi-Sensor Data Fusion for Traffic Speed and Travel. MS thesis. University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2011.
MarchalF., HackneyJ., and AxhausenK. W.. Efficient Map Matching of Large Global Positioning System Data Sets: Tests on Speed-Monitoring Experiment in Zurich. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1935, 2005, pp. 93–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1935-11.
40.
ZakiM. H., SayedT., and ShaabanK.. Use of Drivers’ Jerk Profiles in Computer Vision-Based Traffic Safety Evaluations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2434, 2014, pp. 103–112. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2434-13.
41.
BagdadiO., and VarhelyiA.. Development of a Method for Detecting Jerks in Safety Critical Events. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.032.
42.
StipancicJ., Miranda-MorenoL., and LabbeA.. Measuring Congestion Using Large-Scale Smartphone-Collected GPS Data in an Urban Road Network. In Proceedings of Transportation Association of Canada Annual Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2016.
43.
KoJ., GuenslerR., HunterM., and LiH.. Instrumented Vehicle Measured Speed Variation and Freeway Traffic Congestion. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation, Chicago, Ill., ASCE, Reston, Va., 2006, pp. 356–361.
44.
Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation. Final report. FHWA-HRT-08-051. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 2008.
ElvikR.The Power Model of the Relationship Between Speed and Road Safety: Update and New Analyses. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway, 2009.
