The fracture resistance of a chemically stabilized base or subbase layer is important to the durability and sustainability of a pavement structure. Thus, an appropriate test protocol to characterize the fracture resistance of stabilized bases, subbases, and subgrade soils is essential to the design of pavement materials and structures. This paper proposes a protocol developed on the basis of the semicircular bending test to measure fracture resistance (i.e., fracture energy and fracture toughness) of chemically stabilized material. The effects of three test variables, including specimen thickness, notch length, and loading rate, on fracture properties were investigated, and appropriate values for these test variables were selected for the semicircular bending test protocol. The proposed semicircular bending test method was successful in characterizing the fracture resistance of three chemically stabilized materials. To address fracture properties of the chemically stabilized material more definitively, three-dimensional zone modeling was used and the simulations agreed very well with the experimental results. Both the fracture properties obtained from the experiment and the cohesive zone modeling indicated that polymer-stabilized limestone exhibited a much higher fracture resistance than cement-stabilized limestone and cement-stabilized sand. However, the polymer used demonstrated susceptibility to degradation in the presence of water. Correction of this limitation is the focus of ongoing research on this type of polymer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LittleD. N., and NairS.NCHRP Web-Only Document 144: Recommended Practice for Stabilization of Subgrade Soils and Base Materials.Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
2.
PiratheepanJ.GnanendranC. T., and LoS. C. R.Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Granular Materials for Pavement Design Using Unconfined Compression and IDT Testings with Internal Displacement Measurements.Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 5, 2010, pp. 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000051.
3.
LittleD. N. Evaluation of Structural Properties of Lime Stabilized Soils and Aggregates. Vol. 1: Summary of Findings. National Lime Association, Arlington, Va., 1987.
4.
SobhanK., and MashnadM.Tensile Strength and Toughness of Soil-Cement-Fly-Ash Composite Reinforced with Recycled High-Density Polyethylene Strips.Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2002, pp. 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561 (2002)14:2(177).
5.
PaulD. K., and GnanendranC. T.Determination of Stiffness Properties of Lightly Stabilised Granular Materials from IDT Testing Using Numerical Analysis.Proceedings of 17th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference, Taipei, Taiwan. Geotechnical Society and Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society, 2010, pp. 75–78.
6.
HarisonJ.A.HardinB. O., and MahboubK.Fracture Toughness of Compacted Cohesive Soils Using Ring Test.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 5, 1993, pp. 872–891.
7.
CrockfordW. W., and LittleD. N.Tensile Fracture and Fatigue of Cement-Stabilized Soil.Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 5, 1987, pp. 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1987)113:5 (520).
8.
MolenaarA. A. A.ScarpasA.LiuX., and ErkensS.Semicircular Bending Test, Simple But Useful?Electronic Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 71, 2002, pp. 794–815.
9.
LiX., and MarasteanuM. O.Evaluation of the Low Temperature Fracture Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures Using the Semi Circular Bend Test.Electronic Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 73, 2004, pp. 401–426.
10.
van RooijenR. C., and de BondtA. H.Crack Propagation Performance Evaluation of Asphaltic Mixes Using a New Procedure Based on Cyclic Semicircular Bending Tests. Pavement Cracking: Mechanisms, Modeling, Detection, Testing, and Case Histories.CRC Press, Leiden, Netherlands, 2008, pp. 437–446.
11.
KimY. R.ZhangJ., and BanH.Moisture Damage Characterization of Warm-Mix asphalt Mixtures Based on Laboratory-field Evaluation.Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 31, 2012, pp. 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.085.
12.
ImS.BanH., and KimY.-R.Characterization of Mode-I and Mode-II Fracture Properties of Fine Aggregate Matrix Using a Semicircular Specimen Geometry. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 52, 2014, pp. 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.055.
13.
Al-QadiI. L.OzerH.LambrosJ.KhatibA. E.SinghviP.KhanT.Rivera-PerezJ., and DollB. Testing Protocols to Ensure Performance of High Asphalt Binder Replacement Mixes Using RAP and RAS. Report FHWA-ICT-15-017. Illinois Center for Transportation, Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, 2015.
14.
OzerH.Al-QadiI. L.LambrosJ.El-KhatibA.SinghviP., and DollB.Development of the Fracture-Based Flexibility Index for Asphalt Concrete Cracking Potential Using Modified Semi-Circle Bending Test Parameters.Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 115, 2016, pp. 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.144.
15.
NagaiK.ShimizuS.IwadataM., and KawanoS.The Size Effect on the Brittle Fracture Toughness Under the Large Scale Yielding.Transactions of the Japan Welding Society, Vol. 12, 1981, pp. 14–18.
16.
IqbalM. J., and MohantyB.Experimental Calibration of ISRM Suggested Fracture Toughness Measurement Techniques in Selected Brittle Rocks.Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2007, pp. 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-006-0107-6.
17.
SchmidtR. A. Fracture-Toughness Testing of Limestone. Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 16, No. 5, 1976, pp. 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02327993.
18.
KhanK., and Al-ShayeaN. A.Effect of Specimen Geometry and Testing Method on Mixed Mode I-II Fracture Toughness of a Limestone Rock from Saudi Arabia.Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2000, pp. 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006030070006.
19.
LimL.JohnstonW.ChoiK., and BolandJ. N.Fracture Testing of a Soft Rock with Semicircular Specimens Under Three-Point Bending. Part 1—Mode I.International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1994, pp. 185–197.
20.
BazantZ. P., and GettuR.Rate Effect and Load Relaxation in Static Fracture of Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 89, No. 5, 1992, pp. 456–468.
21.
FowellR. J., and ChenJ. F.The Third Chevron Notch Rock Fracture Specimen—The Cracked Chevron-notched Brazilian Disk. Proceedings of the 31st U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, 1990, pp. 295–302.
22.
ChongK. P.KuruppuM. D., and KuszmaulJ. S.Fracture Toughness Determination of Layered Materials. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1987, pp. 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944 (87)90118-4.
23.
Nath Singh, R., and SunG.A Numerical and Experimental Investigation for Determining Fracture Toughness of Welsh Limestone.Mining Science and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1990, pp. 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9031 (90)90850-R.
24.
RoylanceD.Introduction to Fracture Mechanics. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2001.
25.
NsengiyumvaG.YouT.KimY.-R., and BeranM.Investigation of Testing Variables of a Semicircular Bending Test for Asphalt Concrete Mixtures: Experimental–Statistical Approach. Presented at 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016.
26.
KimY. R.AllenD. H., and LittleD. N.Damage-Induced Modeling of Asphalt Mixtures Through Computational Micromechanics and Cohesive Zone Fracture.Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2005, pp. 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561 (2005)17:5(477).
27.
SongS. H.PaulinoG. H., and ButtlarW. G.A Bilinear Cohesive Zone Model Tailored for Fracture of Asphalt Concrete Considering Viscoelastic Bulk Material. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 73, No. 18, 2006, pp. 2829–2848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.030.
28.
LiX., and MarasteanuM.The Fracture Process Zone in Asphalt Mixture at Low Temperature. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 77, No. 7, 2010, pp. 1175–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.018.
29.
AragãoF.KimY. R.LeeJ., and AllenD. H.Micromechanical Model for Heterogeneous Asphalt Concrete Mixtures Subjected to Fracture Failure.Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2011, pp. 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000004.
30.
AragãoF., and KimY. R.Mode I Fracture Characterization of Bituminous Paving Mixtures at Intermediate Service Temperatures. Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 52, No. 9, 2012, pp. 1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-012-9594-4.
