Operational Evaluation of Two-Lane Roundabouts at Freeway Ramp Terminals: Comparison Between Roundabout and Signalized Interchanges

Abstract

In the United States, roundabouts have recently been constructed to replace signalized intersections at freeway ramp terminals as both a safety and an operational treatment. In practice, this treatment is in need of guidelines specifying conditions when the roundabout or signalized intersection is more appropriate to assist practitioners in deciding which alternative to choose. In particular, research providing a comprehensive operational comparison between roundabouts and signalized interchanges is lacking. The current research—though a strictly calibrated microscopic simulation platform—analyzes and models the control delay at double-lane roundabouts and signalized interchanges. Both roundabouts and signalized interchanges were modeled in a Vissim simulation platform. Capacity at each roundabout entrance was calibrated and validated separately for passenger cars and heavy vehicles, since both vehicle types have different critical and follow-up headways. The design of the simulation experiments covered 2,880 different scenarios for roundabouts and signalized interchanges with varying ramp and arterial volumes, ramp spacing, and heavy-vehicle percentages. From the simulation results, control delay and level of service of the off-ramp and arterial approaches of roundabouts and signalized diamond interchanges were modeled and compared. Ultimately, guidelines for the selection between double-lane roundabouts and signalized interchanges were developed and presented in the form of look-up tables. These tables provide an easy-to-use tool for practitioners to determine the appropriate double-lane interchange to install under specific combinations of traffic demand, heavy-vehicle percentage, and ramp spacing conditions.