Speed and flow of vehicles tend to have several effects on the dynamics of a transport system. Fluctuations of these variables can implicate congestion, can lower predictability, and may even catalyze crashes. A concept of fractal theory called the Hurst exponent—a measure of the long-range dependence (LRD) of a time series—was used to understand the fluctuations in flow and speed of a motorway in Sydney, Australia. The spatial and temporal variation of the LRD for flow (Hflow) and speed (Hspeed) at several monitor sites is discussed. Furthermore, the effects of number of lanes on flow and speed predictability are explored. It was observed that the flow predictability of two-lane sections was significantly lower when compared with three-lane and four-lane sections. Conversely, the speed predictability of four-lane sections was considerably higher than that of two-lane and three-lane sections. Finally, traffic congestion was defined with regard to the LRD of speed, and its correlation with historical incident rates was measured. It was ascertained that monitor sites with a historically high proportion of large Hspeed were correlated with unsafe locations. This study could lead to many applications of fractal analysis on highways and urban traffic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NairA. S., LiuJ.-C., RilettL., and GuptaS.. Non-Linear Analysis of Traffic Flow. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Oakland, Calif., IEEE, New York, 2001, pp. 681–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2001.948742.
2.
BreslinM. C., and BelwardJ. A.. Fractal Dimensions for Rainfall Time Series. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, Vol. 48, No. 4–6, 1999, pp. 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(99)00023-3.
3.
MandelbrotB.How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension. Science, Vol. 156, No. 3775, 1967, pp. 636–638. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.156.3775.636.
4.
BoQ., and RasheedK.. Hurst Exponent and Financial Market Predictability. Presented at Conference on Financial Engineering and Applications, Cambridge, Mass., International Association of Science and Technology for Development, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2004.
5.
ChandS., DixitV., and WallerS. T.. Evaluation of Fluctuating Speed and Lateral Movement of Vehicles: Comparison Between Mixed Traffic and Homogeneous Traffic. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2581, 2016, pp. 104–112. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2581-13.
6.
HurstH. E.Long-Term Storage Capacity of Reservoirs. Transactions of the American Society of Engineers, Vol. 116, 1951, pp. 770–799.
7.
FuH., XuJ., and XuL.. Traffic Chaos and Its Prediction Based on a Nonlinear Car-Following Model. Journal of Control Theory and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2005, pp. 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-005-0053-y.
8.
HurstH. E.Methods of Using Long-Term Storage in Reservoirs. Proceedings – Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 5, No. 5, 1956, pp. 519–543.
9.
MatosJ. A. O., GamaS. M. A., RuskinH. J., SharkasiA. A., and CraneM.. Time and Scale Hurst Exponent Analysis for Financial Markets. Physica A, Vol. 387, No. 15, 2008, pp. 3910–3915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.01.060.
10.
EomC., ChoiS., OhG., and JungW.-S.. Hurst Exponent and Prediction Based on Weak-Form Efficient Market Hypothesis of Stock Markets. Physica A, Vol. 387, No. 18, 2008, pp. 4630–4636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.03.035.
11.
TörökJ., and KertészJ.. The Green Wave Model of Two-Dimensional Traffic: Transitions in the Flow Properties and in the Geometry of the Traffic Jam. Physica A, Vol. 231, No. 4, 1996, pp. 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(96)00144-6.
12.
CampariE. G., and LeviG.. Self-Similarity in Highway Traffic. European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2002, pp. 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e20020028.
13.
BelomestnyD., and SiegelH.. Stochastic and Self-Similar Nature of Highway Traffic Data. Zentrum für Technomathematik, Universität Bremen, Germany, 2003.
14.
ShangP., WanM., and KamaS.. Fractal Nature of Highway Traffic Data. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2007, pp. 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2006.07.017.
15.
VojakR., VehelJ. L., and Danech-PajouhM.. Multifractal Description of Road Traffic Structure. In Symposium on Transportation Systems: Theory and Application of Advanced Technology, International Federation of Automatic Control, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1995, Vol. 2.
16.
LiX., and ShangP.. Multifractal Classification of Road Traffic Flows. Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.10.109.
17.
MengQ., and KhooH. L.. Self-Similar Characteristics of Vehicle Arrival Pattern on Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 135, No. 11, 2009, pp. 864–872. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:11(864).
18.
PeratiM. R., RaghavendraK., KoppulaH. K. R., DoodipalaM. R., and DasariR.. Self-Similar Behavior of Highway Road Traffic and Performance Analysis at Toll Plazas. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 138, No. 10, 2012, pp. 1233–1238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000427.
19.
ThomasK., and DiaH.. Comparative Evaluation of Freeway Incident Detection Models Using Field Data. IEEE Proceedings–Intelligent Transport Systems, Vol. 153, No. 3, 2006, pp. 230–241.
20.
YeC., LiH., and XuG.. An Early Warning Model of Traffic Accidents Based on Fractal Theory. Presented at the 17th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Qingdao, China, IEEE, New York, 2014.
21.
LinL., WangQ., and SadekA.. Short-Term Forecasting of Traffic Volume: Evaluating Models Based on Multiple Data Sets and Data Diagnosis Measures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2392, 2013, pp. 40–47. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2392-05.
22.
LanL. W., LinF.-Y., and KuoA. Y.. Testing and Prediction of Traffic Flow Dynamics with Chaos. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5, 2003, pp. 1975–1990.
23.
HaleemK., AlluriP., and GanA.. Investigating Fractal Characteristics in Crash Trends for Potential Traffic Safety Prediction. Presented at 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016.
24.
RangarajanG., and SantD. A.. A Climate Predictability Index and Its Applications. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 24, No. 10, 1997, pp. 1239–1242. https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL01058.
LeeC., HellingaB., and OzbayK.. Quantifying Effects of Ramp Metering on Freeway Safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.09.011.
28.
GettmanD., and HeadL.. Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, 2003, pp. 104–115. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1840-12.
29.
OhC., and KimT.. Estimation of Rear-End Crash Potential Using Vehicle Trajectory Data. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1888–1893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.009.
30.
BagdadiO.Assessing Safety Critical Braking Events in Naturalistic Driving Studies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 16, 2013, pp. 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.006.
