Bridge deck overlays often require materials that are durable and easy to apply and that have a long fatigue life. In many applications, polymer concrete (PC) has been chosen not only because it meets such requirements but also because it offers additional features such as high friction. However, the service life of PC overlays is reduced, and cracking occurs because of the continuous increase in traffic loads. This paper investigates the use of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) to improve the fracture toughness and fatigue service life of PC. Pristine MWCNTs (P-MWCNTs) and MWCNTs functionalized with carboxyl (COOH-MWCNTs) were used at 0.0- (neat), 0.5-, 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-wt.% contents. Three-point bending tests of notched beams were carried out in which the loading rate was controlled by crack mouth opening displacement. Direct tension tests were also used to examine the effect of MWCNTs on the tensile properties of PC. The results showed that MWCNTs improved the fracture toughness of PC by up to 56% and 112% for P-MWCNTs and COOH-MWCNTs, respectively. Samples prepared with P-MWCNTs showed increased ductility; samples with COOH-MWCNTs provided increased tensile strength. Microstructural analysis with a scanning electron microscope and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed how different types of MWCNTs at different weight contents influenced the behavior of PC.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Polymers and Adhesives in Concrete: State of the Art Report. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich., 2009.
2.
GanguliS., AglanH., DennigP., and IrvinG.. Effect of Loading and Surface Modification of MWCNTs on the Fracture Behavior of Epoxy Nanocomposites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2005, pp. 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684405056425.
3.
YuN., ZhangZ. H., and HeS. Y.. Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Life of MWCNT/Epoxy Composites. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 494, No. 1–2, 2008, pp. 380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.04.051.
4.
TangL.-C., WanY.-J., PengK., PeiY.-B., WuL.-B., ChenL.-M., ShuL.-J., JiangJ.-X., and LaiG.-Q.. Fracture Toughness and Electrical Conductivity of Epoxy Composites Filled with Carbon Nanotubes and Spherical Particles. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 45, No. 5453, 2013, pp. 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.09.012.
5.
ThakreP., LagoudasD., RiddickJ., GatesT., FranklandS. J., RatcliffeJ., ZhuJ., and BarreraE.. Investigation of the Effect of Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes on Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Woven Carbon Fiber—Epoxy Composites. Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 45, No. 10, 2011, pp. 1091–1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998310389088.
6.
WetzelB., RossoP., HaupertF., and FriedrichK.. Epoxy Nanocomposites—Fracture and Toughening Mechanisms. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 73, No. 16, 2006, pp. 2375–2398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.018.
7.
SalemiN., and BehfarniaK.. Effect of Nano-Particles on Durability of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Pavement. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2013, pp. 934–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.037.
8.
ShokriehM. M., KefayatiA. R., and ChitsazzadehM.. Fabrication and Mechanical Properties of Clay/Epoxy Nanocomposite and Its Polymer Concrete. Materials and Design, Vol. 40, 2012, pp. 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.008.
9.
SeyhanA. T., TanoğluM., and SchulteK.. Tensile Mechanical Behavior and Fracture Toughness of MWCNT and DWCNT Modified Vinyl-Ester/Polyester Hybrid Nanocomposites Produced by 3-Roll Milling. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 523, No. 1/2, 2009, pp. 85–92.
10.
MaP. C., KimJ.-K., and TangB. Z.. Effects of Silane Functionalization on the Properties of Carbon Nanotube/Epoxy Nanocomposites. Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 67, No. 14, 2007, pp. 2965–2972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.006.
11.
BalakrishnanA., and SahaM. C.. Tensile Fracture and Thermal Conductivity Characterization of Toughened Epoxy/CNT Nanocomposites. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 528, No. 3, 2011, pp. 906–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.064.
12.
HsiehT. H., KinlochA. J., TaylorA. C., and KinlochI. A.. The Effect of Carbon Nanotubes on the Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Performance of a Thermosetting Epoxy Polymer. Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 46, No. 23, 2011, pp. 7525–7535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5724-0.
13.
GrossiordN., LoosJ., RegevO., and KoningC. E.. Toolbox for Dispersing Carbon Nanotubes into Polymers to Get Conductive Nanocomposites. Chemistry of Materials, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm051881h.
14.
LiaoY.-H., Marietta-TondinO., LiangZ., ZhangC., and WangB.. Investigation of the Dispersion Process of SWNTS/SC-15 Epoxy Resin Nanocomposites. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 385, No. 1–2, 2004.
15.
KabirM. E., SahaM. C., and JeelaniS.. Effect of Ultrasound Sonication in Carbon Nanofibers/Polyurethane Foam Composite. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 459, No. 1–2, 2007, pp. 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.031.
16.
RodgersR. M., MahfuzH., RangariV. K., ChisholmN., and JeelaniS.. Infusion of SiC Nanoparticles into SC-15 Epoxy: An Investigation of Thermal and Mechanical Response. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, Vol. 290, No. 5, 2005, pp. 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.200400202.
17.
SumflethJ., PrehnK., WichmannM. H. G., WedekindS., and SchulteK.. A Comparative Study of the Electrical and Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Nanocomposites Reinforced by CVD- and Arc-Grown Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 70, No. 1, 2010, pp. 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.007.
18.
GojnyF. H., WichmannM. H. G., KöpkeU., FiedlerB., and SchulteK.. Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Epoxy-Composites: Enhanced Stiffness and Fracture Toughness at Low Nanotube Content. Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 64, No. 15, 2004, pp. 2363–2371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002.
19.
ZhouY., PervinF., LewisL., and JeelaniS.. Fabrication and Characterization of Carbon/Epoxy Composites Mixed with Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 475, No. 1–2, 2008, pp. 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.043.
20.
Gómez-del RíoT., SalazarA., PearsonR. A., and RodríguezJ.. Fracture Behaviour of Epoxy Nanocomposites Modified with Triblock Copolymers and Carbon Nanotubes. Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 87, 2016, pp. 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.085.
21.
ParkS.-J., HeoG.-Y., and JinF.-L.. Rheological Properties and Fracture Toughness of Epoxy Resin/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Composites. Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 55, No. 11, 2015, pp. 2676–2682. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.24165.
22.
WhiteK. L., and SueH.. Electrical Conductivity and Fracture Behavior of Epoxy/Polyamide-12/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Composites. Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 51, No. 11, 2011, pp. 2245–2253. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.21996.
23.
MaC., LiuH.-Y., DuX., MachL., XuF., and MaiY.-W.. Fracture Resistance, Thermal and Electrical Properties of Epoxy Composites Containing Aligned Carbon Nanotubes by Low Magnetic Field. Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 114, 2015, pp. 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.04.007.
24.
ZhangZ., TanY., WangX., TanH., and LiJ.. Mechanical Behavior and Fracture Toughness of Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Combination of Fibrous and Spherical Nanofillers. Polymer Composites, Vol. 36, No. 12, 2015, pp. 2147–2156. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23125.
25.
OpeltC. V., BeckerD., LepienskiC. M., and CoelhoL. A. F.. Reinforcement and Toughening Mechanisms in Polymer Nanocomposites—Carbon Nanotubes and Aluminum Oxide. Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 75, No. 15, 2015, pp. 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.019.
26.
Committee 446. Fracture Toughness Testing of Concrete. Report 5. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich., 2009.
27.
Reda TahaM. M., XiaoX., YiJ., and ShriveN. G.. Evaluation of Flexural Fracture Toughness for Quasi-Brittle Structural Materials Using a Simple Test Method. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2002, pp. 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1139/l02-044.
28.
Van der BrandJ.On the Adhesion Between Aluminium and Polymers. PhD dissertation. Technical University of Delft, Netherlands, 2004.
29.
Sharifi GolruS., AttarM. M., and RamezanzadehB.. Studying the Influence of Nano Al2O3 Particles on the Corrosion Performance and Hydrolytic Degradation Resistance of an Epoxy/Polyamide Coating on AA-1050. Progress in Organic Coatings, Vol. 77, No. 9, 2014, pp. 1391–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.04.017.
30.
ZouW., DuZ., LiuY., YangX., LiH., and ZhangC.. Functionalization of MWNTs Using Polyacryloyl Chloride and the Properties of CNT-Epoxy Matrix Nanocomposite. Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 68, No. 15–16, 2008, pp. 3259–3264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.08.011.
31.
KimW., KangS., AhC., LeeY., HaD., ChoiI., and YunW.. Functionalization of Shortened SWCNTs Using Esterification. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, Vol. 25, No. 9, 2004, pp. 1301–1302. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2004.25.9.1301.
