For airport employers, ensuring that the many low-income people employed as baggage handlers and retail salespeople, among others, can get to work ensures the continued efficient operations of the airport and the prosperity of the regional economy. However, high and increasing costs coupled with low wages make commutes unaffordable and constrain employees’ ability to get to their jobs. By using a case study of Chicago, Illinois, Midway International Airport, this research measures the extent to which low-income employees commuting to work at the airport by public transportation could afford their commute in 2011. The results of this analysis suggest that the cost of commuting on public transportation is beyond the means of a low-income budget. Furthermore, that fewer low-income commuters take public transportation as its affordability declines suggests that, although the availability and timeliness of public transportation favor low-income commuters compared with all commuters on average, the cost of public transportation may play a role in determining whether low-income commuters choose to work at the airport. These results promote interventions to increase affordability and expand accessibility to public transportation for low-income commuters to the airport.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GlasmeierA.MIT Living Wage Calculator. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2014. livingwage.mit.edu.
BernsteinJ., BrochtC., and Spade-AguilarM.. How Much Is Enough? Basic Family Budgets for Working Families. Economic Policy Institute, Washington, D.C., 2000.
4.
SassenS.Economic Restructuring and the American City. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1990, pp. 465–490.
NelsonD. W.The High Cost of Being Poor: Another Perspective on Helping Low-Income Families Get By and Get Ahead. Kids Count Data Book: State Profiles of Child Well-Being. Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, Md., 2003.
8.
GlaeserE. L., KahnM. E., and RappaportJ.. Why Do the Poor Live in Cities?Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2000.
LacombeA.Welfare Reform and Access to Jobs in Boston. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.
11.
PughM.Barriers to Work: The Spatial Divide Between Jobs and Welfare Recipients in Metropolitan Areas. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1998.
12.
CoulsonN. E., LaingD., and WangP.. Spatial Mismatch in Search Equilibrium. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2001, pp. 949–972.
13.
ZaxJ. S., and KainJ. F.. Moving to the Suburbs: Do Relocating Companies Leave Their Black Employees Behind?Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1996, pp. 472–504.
14.
PendallR.Driving to Opportunity: Understanding the Links Among Transportation Access, Residential Outcomes, and Economic Opportunity for Housing Voucher Recipients. Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 2014.
15.
CooganM. A.ACRP Report 4: Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008.
16.
ReichM., HallP., and JacobsK.. Living Wage Policies at the San Francisco Airport: Impacts on Workers and Businesses. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2005, pp. 106–138.
DebbageK. G., and DelkD.. The Geography of Air Passenger Volume and Local Employment Patterns by US Metropolitan Core Area: 1973–1996. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2001, pp. 159–167.
19.
BlonigenB. A., and CristeaA. D.. Airports and Urban Growth: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Policy Experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 18278. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass., 2012.
20.
WeisdorfM.Infrastructure: A Growing, Real Return Asset Class. CFA Institute, New York, 2007.
21.
SherryL. and DonohueG.. U.S. Airline Passenger Trip Delay Report. Center for Air Transportation Systems Research, George Mason University, Fairfax, Va., 2008.
22.
KainJ. F.Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 82, 1968, pp. 175–197.
23.
JencksC., and MayerS.. Residential Segregation, Job Proximity, and Black Job Opportunities. Inner-City Poverty in the United States (LynnL. E. and McGearyM. G., eds.), National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 187–222.
24.
IhlanfeldtK. R., and YoungM. V.. The Spatial Distribution of Black Employment Between the Central City and the Suburbs. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1996, pp. 693–707.
25.
RaphaelS., and StollM. A.. Modest Progress: The Narrowing Spatial Mismatch Between Blacks and Jobs in the 1990s. In Redefining Urban and Suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 119–142.
26.
EllisM., WrightR., and ParksV.. Work Together, Live Apart? Geographies of Racial and Ethnic Segregation at Home and at Work. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 94, No. 3, 2004, pp. 620–637.
27.
KroviR., and BarnesC.. Work-Related Travel Patterns of People of Color. Travel Patterns of People of Color, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio, 2000, pp. 45–70.
28.
MaddenJ. F.Why Women Work Closer to Home. Urban Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1981, pp. 181–194.
29.
OngP. M., and BlumenbergE.. Job Access, Commute and Travel Burden Among Welfare Recipients. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1998, pp. 77–93.
30.
IhlanfeldtK. R.Job Accessibility and the Employment and School Enrollment of Teenagers. W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Mich., 1992.
31.
KawabataM.Job Access and Employment Among Low-Skilled Autoless Workers in US Metropolitan Areas. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1651–1668.
32.
HoustonD.Employability, Skills Mismatch and Spatial Mismatch in Metropolitan Labour Markets. Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2005, pp. 221–243.
ImmergluckD.Job Proximity and the Urban Employment Problem: Do Suitable Nearby Jobs Improve Neighbourhood Employment Rates?Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1998, pp. 7–23.
35.
WilsonW. J.The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., 1987.
36.
KasardaJ. D.Urban Change and Minority Opportunities. In The New Urban Reality, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 33–61.
37.
KasardaJ. D.Jobs, Migration, and Emerging Urban Mismatches. In Urban Change and Poverty, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 148–198.
38.
KasardaJ. D.Urban Industrial Transition and the Underclass. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 501, No. 1, 1989, pp. 26–47.
39.
RaphaelS.The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis and Black Youth Joblessness: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 43, No. 1, 1998, pp. 79–111.
40.
StollM. A.When Jobs Move, Do Black and Latino Men Lose? The Effect of Growth in Job Decentralisation on Young Men’s Jobless Incidence and Duration. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 12, 1998, pp. 2221–2239.
41.
StollM. A., and CovingtonK.. Explaining Racial/Ethnic Gaps in Spatial Mismatch in the US: The Primacy of Racial Segregation. Urban Studies, Vol. 49, No. 11, 2012, pp. 2501–2521.
42.
IhlanfeldtK. R., and SjoquistD. L.. The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: A Review of Recent Studies and Their Implications for Welfare Reform. Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1998, pp. 849–892.
43.
HolzerH. J.The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: What Has the Evidence Shown?Urban Studies, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1991, pp. 105–122.
44.
KainJ. F.The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Three Decades Later. Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1992, pp. 371–460.
45.
WheelerL. A.A Review of the Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Its Impact on the Current Plight of the Central City of the United States. Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y., 1990.
46.
GobillonL., SelodH., and ZenouY.. The Mechanisms of Spatial Mismatch. Urban Studies, Vol. 44, No. 12, 2007, pp. 2401–2427.
47.
GordonP., KumarA., and RichardsonH. W.. Congestion, Changing Metropolitan Structure, and City Size in the United States. International Regional Science Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1989, pp. 45–56.
48.
SteinnesD.Causality and Intraurban Location. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1997, pp. 69–79.
49.
SouthS. J., and CrowderK. D.. Residential Mobility Between Cities and Suburbs: Race, Suburbanization, and Back-to-the-City Moves. Demography, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1997, pp. 525–538.
50.
ThurstonL., and YezerA. M.. Causality in the Suburbanization of Population and Employment. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1994, pp. 105–118.
LiH., CampbellH., and FernandezS.. Residential Segregation, Spatial Mismatch and Economic Growth Across US Metropolitan Areas. Urban Studies, Vol. 50, No. 13, 2013, pp. 2642–2660.
53.
WeinbergB. A.Testing the Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis Using Inter-City Variations in Industrial Composition. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2004, pp. 505–532.
54.
MartinR. W.Can Black Workers Escape Spatial Mismatch? Employment Shifts, Population Shifts, and Black Unemployment in American Cities. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2004, pp. 179–194.
55.
ShenQ.Location Characteristics of Inner-City Neighborhoods and Employment Accessibility of Low-Wage Workers. Environment and Planning B, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1998, pp. 345–365.
56.
WhiteM. J.Urban Areas with Decentralized Employment: Theory and Empirical Work. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 3, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1999, pp. 1375–1412.
57.
RaphaelS., and RiceL.. Car Ownership, Employment, and Earnings. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2002, pp. 109–130.
58.
TaylorB. D., and OngP. M.. Spatial Mismatch or Automobile Mismatch? An Examination of Race, Residence and Commuting in US Metropolitan Areas. Urban Studies, Vol. 32, No. 9, 1995, pp. 1453–1473.
59.
McGuckinN., MurakamiE., and KeyesM. A.. Work, Automobility, and Commuting. In Travel Patterns of People of Color, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio, 2000, pp. 71–90.
60.
HansenW. G.How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1959, pp. 73–76.
61.
MullerP. O.Transportation and Urban Form: Stages in the Spatial Evolution of the American Metropolis. In The Geography of Urban Transportation (HansonS. and GiulianoG., eds.), 2004, pp. 59–85.
62.
OngP. M., and MillerD.. Spatial and Transportation Mismatch in Los Angeles. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2005, pp. 43–56.
63.
KaplanS.The Denver Airport Experience. The Decision to Build DIA and Close Stapleton. Kaplan, Kirsch, and Rockwell LLP, Denver, Colo., 2006.
FunkP.Economic Self-Sufficiency: The Minimum Cost of Family Support in Nebraska, 1994. Nebraska Center for Legal Services, Lincoln, 1994.
66.
KahlerE., and HofferD.. Vermont Job Gap Project, Phase I: Basic Needs and a Livable Wage. Peace and Justice Center, Burlington, Vt., 1997.
67.
BangsR. L., KerchisC. Z., and WeldonS. L.. Basic Living Cost and Living Wage Estimates for Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. Center for Social and Urban Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pa., 1997.
68.
Northwest Job Gap Study: Searching for Work That Pays. Northwest Policy Center and Northwest Federation of Community Organizations, Seattle, Wash., 1999.
69.
PearceD.The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Pennsylvania. Wider Opportunities for Women, Inc., Washington, D.C., 1997.
70.
ZimmermanJ., and GarkovichL.. Meeting the Monthly Budget: Earnings and the Cost of Living in Rural Kentucky. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Southern Rural Sociological Association, Little Rock, Ark., 1998.
71.
AllegrettoS.Basic Family Budgets: Working Families’ Incomes Often Fail to Meet Living Expenses in the United States. International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2006, pp. 443–454.
72.
Working Hard, Earning Less. National Priorities Project, Northampton, Mass., and Jobs with Justice, Washington, D.C., 1998.
73.
EinbinderS.Toward Valid Estimates of Poverty Among Families with Children: A New Measure of Relative Deprivation. Review of Income and Wealth, Nov.1997.
74.
RenwickT., and BergmannB.. A Budget-Based Definition of Poverty. Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1993, pp. 1–24.
Leigh Fisher Associates. TCRP Report 83: Strategies for Improving Public Transportation Access to Large Airports. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002.
78.
RicardD. M.ACRP Synthesis of Airport Practice 36: Exploring Airport Employee Commute and Parking Strategies. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012.
79.
Longitudinal Employment–Household Dynamics Origin–Destination Employment Statistics. U.S. Census Bureau, 2011. http://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/.
LoganJ. R., XuZ., and StultsB.. Interpolating U.S. Decennial Census Tract Data from as Early as 1970 to 2010: A Longitudinal Tract Database. Professional Geographer, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 412–420.
American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, 2011. U.S. Census Bureau, 2012. factfinder2.census.gov.
85.
RouwendalJ., and MeijerE.. Preferences for Housing, Jobs, and Commuting: A Mixed Logit Analysis. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 41, 2001, pp. 475–505.
86.
LipmanB. J.Something’s Gotta Give: Working Families and the Cost of Housing. New Century Housing, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005.
87.
PisarskiA. E.NCHRP Report 550–TCRP Report 110: Commuting in America III: The Third National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.
Employee Benefits Survey. Bureau of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, 2006. www.bls.gov/ebs.
91.
KisiaD.Mind the Gap: Empirical Case for Incorporating Airport Worker Considerations in Public Transit Access Planning at Major Airports. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2300, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 100–109.
92.
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates 2006–2011. U.S. Census Bureau, 2012. factfinder2.census.gov.
DawkinsC., and BuehlerR.. Promoting Affordable Housing near Public Transit: The Role of Planning. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2010.
99.
KolkoJ.Making the Most of Transit: Density, Employment Growth, and Ridership Around New Stations. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, 2011.
100.
ArringtonG. B., and CerveroR.. TCRP Report 128: Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking, and Travel. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008.
101.
KrouseS.New Federal Initiative Aims to Bolster Transit-Oriented Sites. Washington Business Journal, 2011.
102.
Advancing Major Transit Investments Through Planning and Project Development, Part II: Project Justification and Local Financial Commitment Criteria. Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
103.
Partnership for Sustainable Communities. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of Transportation, and Environmental Protection Agency, 2013. http://www.sustainablecommunities.gov/.
BlumenbergE., and WallerM.. The Long Journey to Work: A Federal Transportation Policy for Working Families. In Taking the High Road: A Metropolitan Agenda (KatzB., and PuentesR., eds.), Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 2005.
106.
BaumC. L.The Effects of Vehicle Ownership on Employment. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 66, No. 3, 2009, pp. 151–163.
107.
KassabianD., WhitesellA., and HuberE.. Welfare Rules Databook: State TANF Policies as of July 2011. Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 2012.
108.
MeesH. L., DriessenP. P., and RunhaarH. A.. Exploring the Scope of Public and Private Responsibilities for Climate Adaptation. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2012, pp. 305–330.
