This paper operationalizes and tests approaches to identify market segments for rail freight services and measures the importance that customers attach to rail service attributes (i.e., transport cost, time, frequency, reliability, and safety). The approach is based on choice-based conjoint analysis in which heterogeneity is captured by means of latent-class analysis. The research is novel in several respects. First, it addresses the diverse valuation of service preferences by shippers who use rail transport. Second, besides estimates for rail users who contract for transport services, the analysis also arrives at new estimates for forwarders as immediate clients for rail services. Third, in addition to the conventional random utility maximization (RUM) model, the paper discusses trials with a random regret minimization (RRM) model and a hybrid RUM-RRM model. Finally, the research produces unique values for China, one of the largest rail transport markets in the world.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
National Data: Transport, Postal and Telecommunication Services, 2005–2014. National Bureau of Statistics of China. http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01. Accessed July 9, 2015.
2.
CrainicT. G.Service Network Design in Freight Transportation. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 122, No. 2, 2000, pp. 272–288.
3.
ShaineshG., and MathurM.. Service Quality Measurement: The Case of Railway Freight Services. Vikalpa, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2000, pp. 15–22.
4.
BarnhartC., KrishnanN., KimD., and WareK.. Network Design for Express Shipment Delivery. Computational Optimization and Applications, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2002, pp. 239–262.
5.
LiangG. S., ChouT. Y., and KanS. F.. Applying Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment to Identify Service Management Requirements for an Ocean Freight Forwarder. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2006, pp. 539–554.
6.
WangR. T.Improving Service Quality Using Quality Function Deployment: The Air Cargo Sector of China Airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2007, pp. 221–228.
7.
McGinnisM. A.Shipper Attitudes Toward Freight Transportation Choice: A Factor Analytic Study. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1979, pp. 25–34.
8.
MatearS., and GrayR.. Factors Influencing Freight Service Choice for Shippers and Freight Suppliers. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1993, pp. 25–35.
9.
CullinaneK., and ToyN.. Identifying Influential Attributes in Freight Route/Mode Choice Decisions: A Content Analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2000, pp. 41–53.
10.
DanielisR., MarcucciE., and RotarisL.. Logistics Managers’ Stated Preferences for Freight Service Attributes. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,Vol. 41, No. 3, 2005, pp. 201–215.
11.
FowkesA. S., NashC. A., and TweddleG.. Investigating the Market for Inter-Modal Freight Technologies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 25, No. 4, 1991, pp. 161–172.
12.
ChuH. C.Exploring Preference Heterogeneity of Air Freight Forwarders in the Choices of Carriers and Routes. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 37, 2014, pp. 45–52.
13.
ArunotayanunK., and PolakJ. W.. Taste Heterogeneity and Market Segmentation in Freight Shippers’ Mode Choice Behaviour. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2011, pp. 138–148.
14.
De JongG., KouwenhovenM., BatesJ., KosterP., VerhoefE., TavasszyL., and WarffemiusP.. New SP Values of Time and Reliability for Freight Transport in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 64, 2014, pp. 71–87.
15.
FowkesA. S., FirminP. E., WhiteingA. E., and TweddleG.. Freight Road User Valuations of Three Different Aspects Of Delay. Proceedings of the AET European Transport Conference, Sept. 10–12, 2001, Homerton College, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
16.
FowkesA. S., FirminP. E., TweddleG., and WhiteingA. E.. How Highly Does the Freight Transport Industry Value Journey Time Reliability—and For What Reasons?International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2004, pp. 33–43.
17.
FowkesT.The Design and Interpretation of Freight Stated Preference Experiments Seeking to Elicit Behavioural Valuations of Journey Attributes. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 41, No. 9, 2007, pp. 966–980.
18.
HalseA. H., and KilliM.. Values of Transport Time and Reliability for Railway Freight. Norwegian Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway, 2012.
19.
OumT. H.A Cross Sectional Study of Freight Transport Demand and Rail–Truck Competition in Canada. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, pp. 463–482.
20.
LuC. S.The Impact of Carrier Service Attributes on Shipper–Carrier Partnering Relationships: A Shipper’s Perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2003, pp. 399–415.
21.
Feo-ValeroM., García-MenéndezL., and Garrido-HidalgoR.. Valuing Freight Transport Time Using Transport Demand Modelling: A Bibliographical Review. Transport Reviews. Vol. 31, No. 5, 2011, pp. 625–651.
22.
TavasszyL., and De JongG.. Modelling Freight Transport. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2013.
23.
TrainK., and WilsonW. W.. Estimation on Stated-Preference Experiments Constructed from Revealed-Preference Choices. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2008, pp. 191–203.
24.
PattersonZ. R., EwingG. D., and HaiderM.. Shipper Preferences Suggest Strong Mistrust of Rail: Results from Stated Preference Carrier Choice Survey for Quebec City–Windsor Corridor in Canada. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2008, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 67–74.
25.
VieiraL. F. M.The Value of Service in Freight Transportation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.
26.
De JongG.Value of Freight Travel-Time Savings. Handbooks in Transport, Volume 1: Handbook of Transport Modelling, Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2000, pp. 553–564.
27.
FosgerauM.Investigating the Distribution of the Value of Travel Time Savings. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,Vol. 40, No. 8, 2006, pp. 688–707.
28.
De JongG., KouwenhovenM., KroesE., RietveldP., and P. Warffemius, Preliminary Monetary Values for the Reliability of Travel Times in Freight Transport. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2009, pp. 83–99.
29.
KurriJ., SirkiäA., and MikolaJ.. Value of Time in Freight Transport in Finland. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1725, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 26–30.
30.
DanielisR., and MarcucciE.. Attribute Cut-Offs in Freight Service Selection. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2007, pp. 506–515.
31.
BergantinoA. S., and BolisS.. Monetary Values of Transport Service Attributes: Land Versus Maritime Ro-Ro Transport. An Application Using Adaptive Stated Preferences. Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2008, pp. 159–174.
32.
ZampariniL., LayaaJ., and DullaertW.. Monetary Values of Freight Transport Quality Attributes: A Sample of Tanzanian Firms. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1222–1234.
33.
ZampariniL., and ReggianiA.. Freight Transport and the Value of Travel Time Savings: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Studies. Transport Reviews, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2007, pp. 621–636.
34.
CarsonR. T., and J. J. LouviereA Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2011, pp. 539–559.
35.
HalmeM., and KallioM.. Estimation Methods for Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis of Consumer Preferences. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 214, No. 1, 2011, pp. 160–167.
36.
RaoV. R.Choice Based Conjoint Studies: Design and Analysis. In Applied Conjoint Analysis. Springer, Berlin, 2014, pp. 127–183.
37.
Ben-AkivaM. E., and LermanS. R.. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Vol. 9.MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
38.
ChorusC. G.A New Model Of Random Regret Minimization. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2010, pp. 181–196.
39.
ChorusC. G., van CranenburghS., and DekkerT.. Random Regret Minimization for Consumer Choice Research: Assessment of Empirical Evidence. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 67, 2014, pp. 2428–2436.
40.
Significance Quantitative Research, VU University Amsterdam, and John Bates Services.Values of Time and Reliability in Passenger and Freight Transport in The Netherlands. Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, The Hague, Netherlands, 2012.
41.
CarrionC., and LevinsonD.. Value of Travel Time Reliability: A Review of Current Evidence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2012, pp. 720–741.
42.
LamT. C., and SmallK. A.. The Value of Time and Reliability: Measurement from a Value Pricing Experiment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2001, pp. 231–251.
43.
HollanderY.Direct Versus Indirect Models for the Effects of Unreliability. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 40, No. 9, 2006, pp. 699–711.
VermuntJ. K., and MagidsonJ.. Upgrade Manual for Latent GOLD Choice 5.0: Basic, Advanced, And Syntax. Statistical Innovations, Inc., Belmont, Mass., 2013.
46.
LushengA.New Practice of Railway Transportation in China. China Railway Publishing House, Beijing, 2009.
47.
GreeneW. H., and HensherD. A.. A Latent Class Model for Discrete Choice Analysis: Contrasts with Mixed Logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2003, pp. 681–698.
48.
BoeriM., ScarpaR., and ChorusC. G.. Stated Choices and Benefit Estimates in the Context of Traffic Calming Schemes: Utility Maximization, Regret Minimization, or Both?Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 61, 2014, pp. 121–135.
49.
HessS., and ChorusC. G.. Utility Maximization and Regret Minimization: A Mixture of a Generalization. In Bounded Rational Choice Behavior: Applications in Transport (RasouliS. and TimmermansH., eds.), Emerald, Bingley, United Kingdom, 2015, pp. 31–50.
50.
HessS., StathopoulosA., and DalyA.. Allowing for Heterogeneous Decision Rules in Discrete Choice Models: An Approach and Four Case Studies. Transportation, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2012, pp. 565–591.
51.
BoeriM., and MasieroL.. Regret Minimisation and Utility Maximisation in a Freight Transport Context. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2014, pp. 548–560.
