Abstract
This paper compares the estimation quality of two time-dependent origin–destination demand estimation methods in congested networks. The first method uses time-dependent link flow rate observations, whereas the second uses time-dependent link density observations. The developed methods adopt a bilevel formulation framework in which the lower-level problem solves for the time-dependent link proportions by using a simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment model. The upper-level problem is in the form of a least squares error minimization program that minimizes the difference between the observations and their corresponding estimated values. The solution algorithm integrates a simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment model and a linear approximation of the least squares error formulation by using a separable programming approach. An iterative solution algorithm is developed to achieve consistency between the estimated demand and the link proportions. A set of experiments conducted with hypothetical and real-world networks examines the performance of the two methods in replicating the observed congestion pattern in these networks. Results show that the density-based demand estimation method is more suitable for demand estimation in congested networks in that the former method captures the flow breakdown and spillback phenomena associated with high congestion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
