The recently developed traffic-responsive feedback control strategy HERO (heuristic ramp metering coordination), which coordinates local ramp-metering actions in freeway networks, was implemented on the M1 and M3 freeways in Queensland, Australia. HERO employs an extended version of the feedback regulator ALINEA at the local level; it outperforms uncoordinated local ramp metering and approaches the efficiency of sophisticated optimal control schemes. HERO has been implemented by the Department of Transport and Main Roads of the State of Queensland at six on-ramps of the M1 and M3 freeways. The results show significant improvements in traffic throughput and travel times compared with the previously used fixed-rate ramp-metering system. A rapid economic benefit analysis determined a benefit–cost ratio of 13.8:1 at a 7% discount rate and, therefore, an extremely strong economic merit for the implementation of HERO. The economic payback period for the capital expenditure on this pilot is approximately 4 months.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PapageorgiouM.Hadj-SalemH., and BlossevilleJ.-M.ALINEA: A Local Feedback Control Law for On-Ramp Metering. In Transportation Research Record 1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 58–64.
2.
PapageorgiouM.Hadj-SalemH., and MiddlehamF.ALINEA Local Ramp Metering: Summary of Field Results. In Transportation Research Record1603, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 90–98.
3.
PapageorgiouM., and KotsialosA.Freeway Ramp Metering: An Overview.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 3, 2002, pp. 271–281.
4.
BogenbergerK., and MayA. D.Advanced Coordinated Traffic Responsive Ramp Metering Strategies. Working Paper UCB-ITS-PWP-99-1. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
5.
HadiM.A. Coordinated Traffic Responsive Ramp Metering Strategies: An Assessment Based on Previous Studies.Proc., ITS World Congress 2005, San Francisco, Calif., 2005.
6.
AhnS.BertiniR. L.AuffrayB.RossJ. H., and EshelO.Evaluating Benefits of Systemwide Adaptive Ramp-Metering Strategy in Portland, Oregon. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2012, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 47–56.
7.
LippL. E.CorcoranL. J., and HickmanG. A.Benefits of Central Computer Control for Denver Ramp-Metering System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 3–6.
8.
Cambridge Systematics.Mn/DOT Ramp Metering Study. Final report. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, 2001.
9.
HourdakisJ., and MichalopoulosP. G.Evaluation of Ramp Control Effectiveness in Two Twin Cities Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1811, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 21–29.
10.
PapageorgiouM., and PapamichailI.Network-Wide Ramp Metering. Project IST-2004-507645. European Information Society Technologies, Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
11.
PapamichailI., and PapageorgiouM.Traffic-Responsive Linked Ramp-Metering Control.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 9, 2008, pp. 111–121.
12.
PapamichailI.PapageorgiouM.VongV., and GaffneyJ.Heuristic Ramp-Metering Coordination Strategy Implemented at Monash Freeway, Australia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2178, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 10–20.
13.
BhouriN.Hadj-SalemH., and KauppilaJ.Isolated Versus Coordinated Ramp Metering: Field Evaluation Results of Travel Time Reliability and Traffic Impact.Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 28, 2013, pp. 155–167.
14.
Evaluation Report: M1/M3 HERO Ramp Signalling Implementation Pilot.Transport and Main Roads Authority, Queensland, Australia, 2012.
15.
SmaragdisE., and PapageorgiouM.Series of New Local Ramp Metering Strategies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1856, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 74–86.
16.
WangY.KosmatopoulosE.PapageorgiouM., and PapamichailI.Local Ramp Metering in the Presence of a Distant Downstream Bottleneck: Theoretical Analysis and Simulation Study.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2014.
17.
WangY.PapageorgiouM.GaffneyJ.PapamichailI.RoseG., and YoungW.Local Ramp Metering in Random-Location Bottlenecks Downstream of Metered On-Ramp. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2178, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 90–100.
18.
SmaragdisE.PapageorgiouM., and KosmatopoulosE.A Flow-Maximizing Adaptive Local Ramp Metering Strategy.Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 251–270.
19.
VigosG.PapageorgiouM., and WangY.Real-Time Estimation of Vehicle-Count Within Singalized Links.Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 16, 2008, pp. 18–35.
20.
Guide to Project Evaluation Part 4: Project Evaluation Data.Austroads, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2012.
