This paper provides a large-scale, rigorous evaluation of traffic calming projects in one U.S. city. The study area is New York City, which treated 391 streets with speed tables between 1996 and 2003. On the basis of crash frequencies for 5 years before treatment and 5 years after for treated streets and well-matched comparison streets, no evidence emerged that New York City's ambitious traffic calming program has led to a reduction in total crashes, pedestrian crashes, or injury crashes. This is in contrast to earlier, less carefully controlled evaluations that have reported significant reductions in crashes with traffic calming.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention.World Health Organization, Geneva, 2004.
2.
SharmaB. R.Road Traffic Injuries: A Major Global Public Health Crisis. Public Health, Vol. 122, No. 12, 2008, pp. 1399–1406.
The New York City Pedestrian Safety Study and Action Plan.New York City Department of Transportation, 2010.
5.
Safe Streets NYC: Traffic Safety Improvements in New York City.New York City Department of Transportation, 2008.
6.
RettingR., FergusonS., and McCarttA.A Review of Evidence Based Traffic Engineering Measures Designed to Reduce Pedestrian–Motor Vehicle Crashes. Public Health, Vol. 93, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1456–1463.
7.
ZegeerC. V., SeidermanC., LagerweyP., CyneckiM., RonkinM., and SchneiderR.Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide—Providing Safety and Mobility. Report FHWA-RD-102-01. FHWA, McLean, Va., 2002.
8.
EwingR.Traffic Calming State-of-the-Practice.ITE and FHWA, Washington, D.C., 1999.
9.
EwingR., and BrownS.U.S. Traffic Calming Manual.American Planning Association and ASCE, Chicago, Ill., 2009.
10.
GeddesE.. Safety Benefits of Traffic Calming.Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1996.
11.
BiddulphM.Evaluating the English Home Zones Initiative. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2010, pp. 199–218.
12.
ShadishW. R., CookT. D., and CampbellD. T.Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference.Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass., 2002.
13.
HauerE.Observational Before–After Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety.Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd., Bingley, West Yorkshire, England, 1997.
14.
ElvikR.The Importance of Confounding in Observational Before-and-After Studies of Road Safety Measures. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, 2002, pp. 631–635.
15.
HakkertA. S., and GitelmanV.A Wide-Scale Safety Evaluation of Traffic Calming Measures in Residential Areas. Presented at European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France, 2003. http://www.etcproceedings.org/paper/download/994.
16.
TesterJ. M., RutherfordG. W., WaldZ., and RutherfordM. W.Matched Case–Control Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Speed Jumps in Reducing Child Pedestrian Injuries. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 94, 2004, pp. 646–650.
17.
Al-MasaeidH. R.Performance of Safety Evaluation Methods. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 5, 1997, pp. 364–369.
18.
ElvikR.Area-Wide Urban Traffic Calming Schemes: A Meta-Analysis of Safety Effects. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2001, pp. 327–336.
19.
HirstW. M., MountainL. J., and MaherM. J.Sources of Error in Road Safety Scheme Evaluation: A Quantified Comparison of Current Methods. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, 2004, pp. 705–715.
20.
GriffinL. I., and FlowersR. J.A Discussion of Six Procedures for Evaluating Highway Safety Projects.FHWA, 1997.
21.
ChenL., ChenC., EwingR., McKnightC. E., SrinivasanR., and RoeM.Safety Countermeasures and Crash Reduction in New York City—Experience and Lessons Learned. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 312–322.
22.
WebsterD. C., and MackieA. M.Review of Traffic Calming Schemes in 20 mph Zones. TRL Report 215. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 1996.
23.
McCarthyP.Effects of Speed Limits on Speed Distributions and Highway Safety: A Survey of Recent Literature. Transport Reviews, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2001, pp. 31–50.
