Advances in intelligent transportation systems technologies promoted the implementation of open road tolling (ORT) on tolled freeways worldwide. This new tolling solution converts existing barrier toll booths to express lanes that are capable of collecting tolls at high speed. ORT has demonstrated numerous benefits in reducing traffic congestion and air pollution. However, the effects of ORT on safety are still not clear because most ORT systems have been operated for a relatively short period. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the safety impacts of ORT by examining recent practices in New Jersey. Multiple-year crash data at toll plazas before and after the implementation of the ORT systems were analyzed. The full Bayes methodology was employed to develop crash frequency models as a function of traffic and toll plaza configurations. These models were used to estimate the crash frequency on the assumption that the ORT systems were not installed. The estimations were then compared with the observed crash counts that occurred after the deployment of the ORT systems. Comparisons showed that crash reductions were obtained at most of the toll plazas. The overall comparison showed that crash frequency decreased by about 24% after the deployment of the ORT systems and suggested that the use of ORT is a beneficial solution to improve the safety of the toll plazas. From an implementation point of view, the analysis results also indicated that special attention should be paid to operational elements such as signage, diversion, and merge designs of the ORT systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KlodzinskiJ., GordinE., and Al-DeekH. M.Evaluation of Impacts of Open Road Tolling on Main-Line Toll Plaza. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2012, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 72–83.
2.
StewartS.Electronic Tolling and Project Management (ETTM): A Concept and an Opportunity. In IEE Seminar on Electronic Tolling and Congestion Charging, London, March 25, IEEE, New York, 1999, pp. 711–714.
3.
MendozaE., GoldM., CarterP., and ParmarJ.The Sale of Highway 407 Express Toll Route: A Case Study. Journal of Structured Finance, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1999, pp. 5–14.
4.
KlodzinskiJ., and Al-DeekH. M.Evaluation of Toll Plaza Performance After Addition of Express Toll Lanes at Mainline Toll Plaza. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1867, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 107–115.
5.
MurielloM. F., and JijiD.Value Pricing Toll Program at Port Authority of New York and New Jersey: Revenue for Transportation Investment and Incentives for Traffic Management. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1864, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 9–15.
6.
SuarezE., and HoeflichK.The End of the Toll Booth?Public Roads, Vol. 68, No. 6, 2005, pp. 64–70.
7.
KovacsP., and Abou-SabhS.The Implementation of Open Road Tolling on the Illinois Tollway. Tollways, Dec. 2008, pp. 92–101.
8.
LevinsonD., and OdlyzkoA.Too Expensive to Meter: The Influence of Transaction Costs in Transportation and Communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A, Vol. 366, No. 1872, 2008, pp. 2033–2046.
9.
LinJ., and YuD.Traffic-Related Air Quality Assessment for Open Road Tolling Highway Facility. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 88, No. 4, 2008, pp. 962–969.
10.
SiegelJ., OrcuttJ., and SlevinK.The Open Road: The Region's Coming Toll Collection Revolution.Tri-State Transportation Campaign, New York, May 2004.
11.
BendaJ., HochmuthJ., KowshikR., and MedgyesyL.Open Road Tolling Signing Studies. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
WeinsteinJ.Garden State Parkway Congestion Relief Plan: A Proposed Framework.N.J. Department of Transportation, Trenton, 2001.
14.
RaczynskiR., and FinnJ.Garden State Parkway Plaza Improvement Program. Presented at Facilities Management Workshop, May 14–18, International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2005.
15.
CiszewskiS., HubickiD., and TangW.Garden State Parkway Raritan South Express Lanes. Presented at IBTTA 73rd Annual Meeting and Exhibition, Sept. 17–21, Cleveland, Ohio, 2005.
16.
CiszewskiS.Express Lanes and One Way Tolls. Presented at IBTTA Fall Technology Workshop, Nov. 13–16, Madrid, 2004.
CurrieJ., and WalkerR.Traffic Congestion and Infant Health: Evidence from E-ZPass. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2011, pp. 65–90.
21.
Garden State Parkway Tokens Won't Be Accepted from Jan 1—Cash Going Too?Toll Road News, 2008. http://www.tollroadsnews.com/node/3818. Accessed May 15, 2011.
ResendeP. T. V., and BenekohalR. F.Effects of Roadway Section Length on Accident Modeling. In Traffic Congestion and Traffic Safety in the 21st Century: Challenges, Innovations, and Opportunities, Chicago, Ill., June 8–11, ASCE, New York, 1997, pp. 403–409.
24.
Abdel-AtyM., DevarasettyP. C., and PandeA.Safety Evaluation of Multilane Arterials in Florida. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2009, pp. 777–788.
25.
HauerE.Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety.Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science, Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997.
26.
ElvikR.The Importance of Confounding in Observational Before-and-After Studies of Road Safety Measures. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2002, pp. 631–635.
27.
ShenJ., and GanA.Development of Crash Reduction Factors: Methods, Problems, and Research Needs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 50–56.
28.
MiaouS., and LumH.Modeling Vehicle Accidents and Highway Geometric Design Relationships. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1993, pp. 689–709.
29.
HauerE.Overdispersion in Modelling Accidents on Road Sections and in Empirical Bayes Estimation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2001, pp. 799–808.
30.
LordD., WashingtonS. P., and IvanJ. N.Poisson, Poisson-Gamma and Zero Inflated Regression Models of Motor Vehicle Crashes: Balancing Statistical Fit and Theory. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2005, pp. 35–46.
31.
El-BasyounyK., and SayedT.Accident Prediction Models with Random Corridor Parameters. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2009, pp. 1118–1123.
32.
LunnD., TomasA., BestN., and SpiegelhalterD.WinBUGS—A Bayesian Modelling Framework: Concepts, Structure, and Extensibility. Statistics and Computing, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2000, pp. 325–337.
33.
LanB., PersaudB., LyonC., and BhimR.Validation of a Full Bayes Methodology for Observational Before–After Road Safety Studies and Application to Evaluation of Rural Signal Conversions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2009, pp. 574–580.
34.
Yanmaz-TuzelO., and OzbayK.A Comparative Full Bayesian Before-and-After Analysis and Application to Urban Road Safety Counter-measures in New Jersey. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, pp. 2099–2107.
35.
SpiegelhalterD., BestN., CarlinB. P., and Van der LindeA.Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and Fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Vol. 64, No. 4, 2002, pp. 583–639.
36.
GelmanA., MengX. L., and SternH.Posterior Predictive Assessment of Model Fitness via Realized Discrepancies (with discussion). Statistica Sinica, Vol. 6, 1996, pp. 733–807.
37.
BurnhamK. P., and AndersonD. R.Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. Springer, New York, 2002.
38.
MohamedA., Abdel-AtyM., and KlodzinskiJ.Safety Considerations in Designing Electronic Toll Plazas: Case Study. ITE Journal, 2001, pp. 20–24.
