Drawing on individual-level mobility data from Germany between 1996 and 2009, this analysis econometrically investigates the determinants of automobile, public transit, and nonmotorized travel. The paper explores whether gender plays a role in determining the relative use of motorized and nonmotorized modes and, if so, how this role is mitigated or exacerbated by other socioeconomic attributes of the individual and the household. The results indicate that women display a relatively higher use of public transit and nonmotorized modes coupled with a lower use of the car. However, it is important to qualify conclusions on the effect of gender, given the range of confounding factors that mediate its impact, including age, the presence of children, the proximity to public transit, and the commute distance. The econometric estimates indicate that fare pricing and infrastructure provision have a significant influence on how individuals reach mode allocation decisions and that women, in particular, stand to benefit from the maintenance of an efficient and dense public transportation network.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RosenthalE.Europe Stifles Drivers in Favor of Alternatives. New York Times, June 26, 2011.
Climate for a Transport Change. TERM 2007: Indicators Tracking Transport and the Environment in the European Union. Report 1/2008. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008.
4.
Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, March 28, 2011.
5.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council: Setting Emission Performance Standards for New Passenger Cars as Part of the Community's Integrated Approach to Reduce CO2 Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, Dec. 19, 2007.
6.
HamiltonK.Gender and Transport in Developed Countries. Paper Commissioned by UNED as Input for the Expert Workshop on Gender Perspectives for Earth Summit 2002: Energy, Transport, Information for Decision-Making, Berlin, 2001.
7.
MatthiesE., KuhnS., and KlöcknerC. A.. Travel Mode Choice of Women: The Result of Limitation, Ecological Norm, or Weak Habit?Environment and Behavior, Vol. 34, 2002, pp. 163–177.
8.
PattersonZ., EwingG., and HaiderM.Gender-Based Analysis of Work Trip Mode Choice of Commuters in Suburban Montreal, Canada, with Stated Preference Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1924, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 85–93.
9.
PickupL.Women's Gender-Role and Its Influence on Travel Behavior. Built Environment, Vol. 10, 1985, pp. 61–68.
10.
RosenbloomS., and BurnsE.Why Working Women Drive Alone: Implications for Travel Reduction Programs. In Transportation Research Record 1459, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 39–45.
11.
TurnerT., and NiemeierD.Travel to Work and Household Responsibility: New Evidence. Transportation, Vol. 24, 1997, pp. 397–419.
12.
SermonsM.W., and KoppelmanF.S.Representing the Differences Between Female and Male Commute Behavior in Residential Location Models. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 9, 2001, pp. 101–110.
13.
ManningI.The Journey to Work. George Allen and Unwin, Boston, Mass., 1978.
14.
GuilanoG.Public Transport and the Travel Needs of Women. Traffic Quarterly, Vol. 6, 1979, pp. 72–83.
15.
HansonS., and JohnstonI.Gender Differences in Work-Trip Length: Explanations and Implications. Urban Geography, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1985, pp. 193–219.
16.
PreißnerC. L., HuneckeM., SanderC., and BackhausW.. Mobilitätsbedürfnisse und Mobilitätsverhalten in der Alltagsgestaltung von Frauen. In Gestaltungsoptionen für eine zukunftsfähige Mobilität—Eine empirische Studie zum Zusammenwirken von Raumstruktur und Lebensstil im Mobilitätsverhalten von Frauen und Männern in vier ausgewählten Kölner Stadtquartieren (HuneckeM., ed.), WerkstattBericht 27, Gelsen-kirchen, Germany, 2000.
17.
GordonP., KumarA., and RichardsonH.W.Gender Differences in Metropolitan Travel Behavior. Regional Studies, Vol. 23, No. 6, 1989, pp. 499–510.
18.
RosenbloomS.Trends in Women's Travel Patterns. Proc., Second National Conference of Women's Travel Issues, Baltimore, Md., 1996, pp. 16–34.
19.
HeineH., MautzR., and RosenbaumW.Mobilität im Alltag. Warum wir nicht vom Auto lassen. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, Germany, 2001.
20.
VanceC., and IovannaR.Gender and the Automobile: Analysis on Nonwork Service Trips. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2013, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 54–61.
21.
BestH., and LanzendorfM.Division of Labour and Gender Differences in Metropolitan Car Use. An Empirical Study in Cologne, Germany. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, 2005, pp. 109–121.
KingG., TomzM., and WittenbergJ.Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2000, pp. 347–361.
FrondelM., and VanceC.Driving for Fun? Comparing the Effect of Fuel Prices on Weekday and Weekend Fuel Consumption. Energy Economics, Vol. 32, 2010, pp. 102–109.
28.
BerndtE. R.The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass., 1991.
29.
CornelißenW.Gender-Datenreport: Datenreport zur Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend, 2. Fassung, Munich, Germany, 2005.
LimbourgM.Mobilität im Alter: Probleme und Perspektiven. Presented at Conference on Seniorinnen und Senioren als Kriminalitäts- und Verkehrsunfallopfer, Düsseldorf, Germany, 1999.
33.
JustT.Demographic Developments Will Not Spare the Public Infrastructure. Deutsche Bank Research, June 7, 2004.
34.
ZumkellerD., ChlondB., and ManzW.Infrastructure Development in Germany Under Stagnating Demand Conditions: A New Paradigm? InTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1864, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 121–128.
