In normal driving conditions, drivers can usually anticipate with a good degree of accuracy the movements of vehicles ahead of them. Such anticipation can reduce the gaps between vehicles and produce high flows on freeway lanes. This anticipation effect is introduced in a car-following model in continuous space and discrete time, along with a set of driving rules that capture the car-following behavior of drivers. Detailed analysis shows that the model can simulate the full range of traffic conditions—free flow, congestion, and traffic jams under fixed and moving bottlenecks—and produce realistic flow capacities and fundamental diagrams with different levels of anticipation. Moreover, analysis of jam formation and decay reveals the underlying relationship between the parameters of the model and the triangular fundamental diagram. The platoon effect can be captured in the model by gap anticipation level (a) dependent on the gap.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ZhangH. M.A Theory of Nonequilibrium Traffic Flow. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 32, No. 7, 1998, pp. 485–498.
2.
BrackstoneM., and McDonaldM.Car-Following: A Historical Review. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1999, pp. 181–196.
3.
BrackstoneM., SultanB., and McDonaldM.Motorway Driver Behaviour: Studies on Car Following. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2002, pp. 31–46.
4.
KestingA., and TreiberM.Calibrating Car-Following Models by Using Trajectory Data: Methodological Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2088, Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 148–156.
5.
ZhangX., and JarrettD.F.Stability Analysis of the Classical Car-Following Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 31, No. 6, 1997, pp. 441–462.
6.
EissfeldtN., and WagnerP.Effects of Anticipatory Driving in a Traffic Flow Model. European Physical Journal B, Vol. 33, No. 2003, pp. 121–129.
7.
TreiberM., KestingA., and HelbingD.Delays, Inaccuracies and Anticipation in Microscopic Traffic Models. Physica A, Vol. 360, No. 1, 2006, pp. 71–88.
8.
KestingA., TreiberM., SchönhofM., KrankeF., and HelbingD.Jam-Avoiding Adaptive Cruise Control and Its Impact on Traffic Dynamics. Proc., Traffic and Granular Flow 2005, Berlin, 2007, pp. 633–643.
9.
JiangR., WuQ. S., and ZhuZ. J.A New Continuum Model for Traffic Flow and Numerical Tests. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2002, pp. 405–419.
10.
LeeH., LeeH. W., and KimD.Macroscopic Traffic Models from Microscopic Car-Following Models. Physical Review E, Vol. 64, No. 5, 2001.
11.
KestingA., TreiberM., SchönhofM., and HelbingD.Extending Adaptive Cruise Control to Adaptive Driving Strategies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2000, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 16–24.
12.
GeH., DaiS. Q., DongL.Y., and XueY.Stabilization Effect of Traffic Flow in an Extended Car-Following Model Based on an Intelligent Transportation System Application. Physical Review E, Vol. 70, No. 6, 2004.
13.
LenzH., WagnerC., and SollacherR.Multi-anticipative Car-Following Model. European Physical Journal B, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1999, pp. 331–335.
14.
HermanR., MontrollE. W., PottsR.B., and RotheryR.W.Traffic Dynamics: Analysis of Stability in Car Following. Operations Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1959, pp. 86–106.
15.
BishopR.Intelligent Vehicle Technology and Trends. Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 2005.
16.
NagelK., and SchreckenbergM.A Cellular Automaton Model for Freeway Traffic. Journal de Physique I, Vol. 2, No. 12, 1992, pp. 2221–2229.
17.
ChowdhuryD., GhoshK., MajumdarA., SinhaS., and StinchcombeR.B.Particle-Hopping Models of Vehicular Traffic: Distributions of Distance Headways and Distance Between Jams. Physica A, Vol. 246, No. 3–4, 1997, pp. 471–486.
18.
MahmassaniH., and SheffiY.Using Gap Sequences to Estimate Gap Acceptance Functions. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1981, pp. 143–148.
19.
PollatschekM.A., PolusA., and LivnehM.A Decision Model for Gap Acceptance and Capacity at Intersections. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, No. 7, 2002, pp. 649–663.
20.
KtitarevD.V., ChowdhuryD., and WolfD.E.Stochastic Traffic Model with Random Deceleration Probabilities: Queuing and Power-Law Gap Distribution. Journal of Physics A, Vol. 30, No. 8, 1997, pp. L221–L228.
21.
DaganzoC.F., and GeroliminisN.An Analytical Approximation for the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram of Urban Traffic. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 42, No. 9, 2008, pp. 771–781.
22.
CastilloJ. M.Propagation of Perturbations in Dense Traffic Flow: A Model and Its Implications. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2001, pp. 367–389.
23.
BihamO., MiddletonA., and LevineD.Self-Organization and a Dynamical Transition in Traffic-Flow Models. Physical Review A, Vol. 46, No. 10, 1992, pp. 6124–6127.
24.
GalstyanA., and LermanK.A Stochastic Model of Platoon Formation in Traffic Flow. Proc., TASK Workshop, Santa Fe, N. Mex., 2001.
25.
WolfD. E.Cellular Automata for Traffic Simulations. Physica A, Vol. 263, No. 1–4, 1999, pp. 438–451.
26.
ZhangH., and KimT.A Car-Following Theory for Multiphase Vehicular Traffic Flow. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2005, pp. 385–399.
27.
TreiberM., KestingA., and HelbingD.Understanding Widely Scattered Traffic Flows, the Capacity Drop, and Platoons as Effects of Variance-Driven Time Gaps. Physical Review E, Vol. 74, No. 1, 2006.
