Durability of Pavement Concretes Made with Recycled Concrete Aggregates

Abstract

There is a growing trend to replace the traditional ingredients of concrete pavement mixtures with more sustainable materials from a perspective of both the cost of raw materials and the carbon dioxide footprint. The availability of quality natural aggregates, which make up about 70% to 80% of concrete (by volume), is becoming more limited because of environmental restrictions on quarrying operations and longer hauling distances. The other major concern is disposal of old concrete pavements, which unless used as fill or base material for construction of new roadways, will have to be placed in the landfills. In this study, recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) obtained from crushing old concrete pavement were used as coarse aggregates at 0%, 30%, 50%, and 100% replacement levels (by mass) for natural virgin aggregates (NVA). Concrete mixtures were designed and produced to meet the concrete pavement requirements for air content, slump, and flexural strength stipulated by the Indiana Department of Transportation. All concrete mixtures were produced with 18.5% to 20.0% of the cement replaced (by mass) with ASTM C618 Class C fly ash. The physical and mechanical testing involved evaluation of slump, air content, and development of both flexural and compressive strengths. In addition, durability was assessed with the freeze–thaw test, scaling test, rapid chloride permeability (RCP) test, and non–steady state migration test. The most advantageous dosages for replacing NVA with RCA for concrete pavements were found to be 50%, on the basis of fresh concrete properties and the results of strength and durability tests. The applicability of electrical impedance spectroscopy for quick performance appraisal is presented on the basis of the experimental relationship between the RCP charge and bulk resistance of concrete.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Poon

C.S.

, Shui

Z.H.

, Lam

, Fok

, and Kou

S. C.

Influence of Moisture States of Natural and Recycled Aggregates on the Slump and Compressive Strength of Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2004, pp. 31–36.

Nixon

P. J.

Recycled Concrete as an Aggregate for Concrete–A Review. RILEM TC-37-DRC. Materials and Structures, Vol. 11, No. 65, 1978, pp. 371–378.

Hansen

Recycling of Demolished Concrete and Masonry. Demolition and Reuse of Concrete. Report of Technical Committee 37-DRC. 1992.

Kou

S.C.

, and Poon

C. S.

Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete Prepared with Coarse and Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 31, No. 9, 2009, pp. 622–627.

Xiao

, Sun

, and Falkner

Seismic Performance of Frame Structures with Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Engineering Structures, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1–8.

Recycling and Reuse of Waste Concrete in China. Part II: Structural Behaviour of Recycled Aggregate Concrete and Engineering Applications. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2009, pp. 107–112.

Rao

, Jha

K.N.

, and Misra

Use of Aggregates from Recycled Construction and Demolition Waste in Concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2007, pp. 71–81.

Evangelista

, and de Brito

Mechanical Behavior of Concrete Made with Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2007, pp. 397–401.

Evangelista

, and de Brito

Durability Performance of Concrete Made with Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2010, pp. 9–14.

10.

Khatib

J. M.

Properties of concrete incorporating fine recycled aggregate. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2005, pp. 763–769.

11.

Etxeberria

, Vazquez

, Mari

, and Barra

Influence of Amount of Recycled Coarse Aggregates and Production Process on Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2007, pp. 735–742.

12.

Gomes

, and de Brito

Structural Concrete with Incorporation of Coarse Recycled Concrete and Ceramic Aggregates: Durability Performance. Materials and Structures, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2009, pp. 663–675.

13.

Tam

V. W. Y.

, and Tam

C. M.

Diversifying Two-Stage Mixing Approach (TSMA) for Recycled Aggregate Concrete: TSMAS and TSMASC. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 22, No. 10, 2008, pp. 2068–2077.

14.

Ferreira

, de Brito

, and Barra

Influence of Pre-Saturation of Recycled Coarse Concrete Aggregates on Structural Concrete's Mechanical and Durability Properties. Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 63, No. 8, 2011, 617–627.

15.

Abbas

, and Fathizal

Durability of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Designed with Equivalent Mortar Volume Method. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 31, No. 8, 2009, pp. 555–563.

16.

Verian

, Jain

, Whiting

, and Olek

Mechanical Properties of Concretes Made with Different Levels of Recycled Concrete as Coarse Aggregates. Presented at International Concrete Sustainability Conference, Boston, Mass., 2011.

17.

NT BUILD 492. Concrete, Mortar and Cement-Based Repair Materials: Chloride Migration Coefficient from Non-Steady-State Migration Experiments. NORDTEST Method 492. NORDTEST, Espoo, Finland, 1999.

18.

ITM No. 210-08T Class AP Coarse Aggregate, Indiana Department of Transportation, 2008.