Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper presents recent developments and applications of three- (3-D) and four-dimensional (4-D) modeling on two transportation projects and their added value for constructability reviews. Transportation projects are characterized by challenges, such as design complexity, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, and traffic management, which truly need to be addressed by constructability reviews so as to make projects successful by minimizing delays, cost overruns, change orders, and so on. The 3-D and 4-D computer-aided drafting (CAD) models are new emerging tools that can tremendously aid constructability reviews. Although the models are extensively used in building projects for this purpose, their use in transportation projects is limited. The 3-D and 4-D CAD models in building projects could also be applied to transportation projects. The 3-D and 4-D CAD model applications developed for the two transportation projects in this paper emphasize the value added by this new technology to communication, technical design checking, construction planning, and work area management applied to transportation projects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Liapi

, O'Connor

, and Khwaja

Highway Interchanges: Construction Schedule and Traffic Planning Visualization. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Kockelman

K. M.

, Heiner

J. D.

, Hakimi

, and Jarrett

Right-of-Way Costs and Property Values: Estimating the Costs of Texas Takings and Commercial Property Sales Data. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, 2004.

Easa

S. M.

, Strauss

T. R.

, Hassan

, and Souleyrette

R. R.

Three-Dimensional Transportation Analysis: Planning and Design. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 128, No. 3, 2002, pp. 250–258.

McManus

J. F.

, Phillip

N. A.

, Stanton

J. F.

, and Turkiyyah

G. M.

Framework for the Constructability Review of Transportation Projects. Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington, Seattle, 1996.

Staub-French

Providing Cost and Constructability Feedback to Designers. Construction Research Congress, 2003.

Koo

, and Fischer

Feasibility Study of 4-D CAD in Commercial Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 126, No. 4, 2000, pp. 251–260.

Whisker

V. E.

, Baratta

A. J.

, Yerrapathruni

, Mesner

J. I.

, Shaw

T. S.

, Warren

M. E.

, and Rotthoff

E. S.

Using Immersive Virtual Environments to Develop and Visualize Construction Schedules for Advanced Nuclear Power Plants. International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants, Cordoba, Spain, 2003.

Coles

B. C.

, and Reinschmidt

K. F.

Computer Integrated Construction. Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 64, No. 6, 1994, pp. 50–53.

Staub-French

, and Khanzode

3-D and 4-D Modeling for Design and Construction Coordination: Issues and Lessons Learned. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, Vol. 12, 2007, pp. 381–407.

10.

Hartmann

, Gao

, and Fischer

Areas of Application for 3-D and 4-D Models on Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 10, 2008, pp. 776–785.

11.

Hartmann

, and Fischer

Supporting the Constructability Review with 3-D/4-D Models. Building Research and Information, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2007, pp. 70–80.

12.

Rajendran

Constructability Review Process. Constructability Concepts and Practice, 2007, pp. 6–25.

13.

Ospina-Alvarado

A. M.

, and Castro-Lacouture

Interaction of Process and Phases in Project Scheduling Using BIM for A/E/C/FM Integration. Proc., Construction Research Congress 2010, ASCE, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2010, pp. 939–948.

14.

Staub-French

, and Fischer

Constructability Reasoning Based on a 4-D Facility Model. Structural Engineering World Wide, Elsevier Science Ltd., 1998.

15.

Gao

, and Fischer

Framework and Case Studies Comparing Implementations and Impacts of 3-D/4-D CAD Modeling Across Projects. Center for Integrated Facilities Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 2008.

16.

Staub-French

, Russell

, and Tran

Linear Scheduling and 4-D Visualization. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2008, pp. 192–205.

17.

Chevallier

, and Russell

A. D.

Automated Schedule Generation. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1998, pp. 1059–1077.

18.

Sawyer

Maturing Visualization Tools Make Ideas Look Real. Engineering News Record, Vol. 255, No. 2, 2005, pp 28–33.

19.

Kim

, Kim

, Park

, and Kim

M. K.

Applicability of 4-D CAD in Civil Engineering Construction: Case Study of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Project. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2011, pp. 98–107.

20.

Liapi

K. A.

4-D Visualization of Highway Construction Projects. Proc., 7th International Conference on Information Visualization, 2003, pp. 639–644.

Benefits of Three- and Four-Dimensional Computer-Aided Design Model Applications for Review of Constructability

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References