An emphasis on active modes of transportation, that is, walking and cycling, has recently been renewed amid concerns for the environment and public health. However, the focus of research and practice that these modes have traditionally received is secondary to that received by motorized modes. As a consequence, the data on pedestrians (in particular, microscopic data) required for analysis and modeling are lacking. For instance, accurate data on the length of individual stride are not available in the transportation literature. This paper proposes a simple method to extract frequency and length of pedestrian stride automatically from video data collected nonintrusively in outdoor urban environments. The walking speed of a pedestrian oscillates during each stride; the oscillation can be identified through the frequency analysis of the speed signal. The method was validated with real-world data collected in Rouen, France, and Vancouver, Canada, where the root mean square errors for stride length were 6.1 and 5.7 cm, respectively. A method to distinguish pedestrians from motorized vehicles is proposed and used to analyze the 50 min of the Rouen data set to provide the distributions of stride frequency and length.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MorencyC., DemersM., and LapierreL.How Many Steps Do You Have in Reserve? Thoughts and Measures About a Healthier Way to Travel. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2002, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 1–6.
2.
MorencyC., RoordaM. J., and DemersM.Steps in Reserve: Comparing Latent Walk Trips in Toronto, Ontario, and Montreal, Quebec, Canada. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 111–119.
3.
SaunierN., and SayedT. A.Probabilistic Framework for Automated Analysis of Exposure to Road Collisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 96–104.
4.
SaunierN., SayedT., and IsmailK.Large-Scale Automated Analysis of Vehicle Interactions and Collisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2147, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 42–50.
5.
IsmailK. A., SayedT. A., and SaunierN.Automated Collection of Pedestrian Data Using Computer Vision Techniques. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
6.
IsmailK., SayedT., SaunierN., and LimC.Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts Using Video Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 44–54.
7.
IsmailK., SayedT., and SaunierN.Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts: Context for Before-and-After Studies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2198, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 52–64.
8.
HuG., SartiC., JousilahtiP., SilventoinenK., BarengoN. C., and TuomilehtoJ.Relation Between Commuting, Leisure Time Physical Activity and Serum Lipids in a Chinese Urban Population. Annals of Human Biology, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2001, pp. 412–421.
9.
SallisJ. F., FrankL., SaelensB., and KraftM.Active Transportation and Physical Activity: Opportunities for Collaboration on Transportation and Public Health Research. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2001, pp. 249–268.
10.
FrankL. D., AndresenM. A., and SchmidT. L.Obesity Relationships with Community Design, Physical Activity, and Time Spent in Cars. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2004, pp. 87–96.
11.
HuG., SartiC., JousilahtiP., SilventoinenK., BarengoN. C., and TuomilehtoJ.Leisure Time, Occupational, and Commuting Physical Activity and the Risk of Stroke. Stroke, Vol. 36, No. 9, 2005, pp. 1994–1999.
12.
WarburtonD. E. R., WhitneyN. C., and BredinS. S. D.Health Benefits of Physical Activity: The Evidence. Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol. 174, No. 6, 2006, pp. 801–809.
Tudor-LockeC., PangraziR. P., CorbinC. B., RutherfordW. J., VincentS. D., RaustorpA., TomsonL. M., and CuddihyT. F.BMI-Referenced Standards for Recommended Pedometer-Determined Steps/Day in Children. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2004, pp. 857–864.
15.
VenutiF., and BrunoL.Crowd–Structure Interaction in Lively Footbridges Under Synchronous Lateral Excitation: A Literature Review. Physics of Life Reviews, Vol. 6, No. 3. 2009, pp. 176–206.
16.
HoogendornS. P., and DaamenW.Extracting Microscopic Pedestrian Characteristics from Video Data. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
17.
BechtelR.Human Movement in Architecture, Environmental Psychology.Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1970.
18.
GuerrierJ. H., and SylvanC.Jr.Give Elderly Pedestrians More Time To Cross Intersections. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, Chicago, Ill., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 1998.
19.
MalinovskiyY., ZhengJ., and WangY.Simple and Model-Free Algorithm for Real-Time Pedestrian Detection and Tracking. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
20.
ChaeK., and RouphailN. M.Empirical Study of Pedestrian–Vehicle Interactions in the Vicinity of Single-Lane Roundabouts. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
21.
KerridgeJ., ArmitageA., BinnieD., LeiL., and SumpterN.Using Low-Cost Infrared Detectors to Monitor Movement of Pedestrians: Initial Findings. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1878, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 11–18.
22.
EnzweilerM., and GavrilaD. M.Monocular Pedestrian Detection: Survey and Experiments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 31, No. 12, 2009, pp. 2179–2195.
23.
ForsythD. A., ArikanO., IkemotoL., O'BrienJ., and RamananD.Computational Studies of Human Motion. Part 1. Tracking and Motion Synthesis. Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision, Vol. 1, Now Publishers Inc., Delft, Netherlands, 2005, pp. 77–254.
24.
NiyogiS. A., and AdelsonE. H.Analyzing Gait with Spatiotemporal Surfaces. Presented at IEEE Workshop on Nonrigid and Articulated Motion, Austin, Tex., 1994, pp. 64–69.
25.
BodgiJ.Synchronisation Piétons-Structure: Application aux Vibrations des Passerelles Souples.École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, Marne-la-Vallée, France, 2008.
26.
SaunierN., and SayedT.A Feature-Based Tracking Algorithm for Vehicles in Intersections.IEEE, New York, 2006.
27.
BeymerD., McLauchlanP., CoifmanB., and MalikJ.A Real-Time Computer Vision System for Measuring Traffic Parameters. Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, Piscataway, N.J., 1997, pp. 495–501.
28.
IsmailK., SayedT., and SaunierN.Automated Pedestrian Safety Analysis Using Video Data in the Context of Scramble Phase Intersections. Presented at Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2009.
29.
IsmailK., SayedT., and SaunierN.Camera Calibration for Urban Traffic Scenes: Practical Issues and a Robust Approach. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
30.
DalalN., and TriggsB.Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection. Proc., IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, IEEE, Piscataway, N.J., 2005, pp. 886–893.
