Improved mobility and accessibility for passengers and goods provide competitive advantages for megaregions. This article describes the trends in mobility in China's top three megaregions—the Capital Economic Zone, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta—and how megaregional planning has led to solutions to the challenges of mobility. China's experience is compared with trends in megaregions in the United States and the European Union. This comparative context confirms that existing trends in China's regional mobility carry severe energy and environmental challenges and that China's movement toward rail, particularly high-speed rail, provides a better chance to mitigate congestion and pollution problems.
United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 Revision:Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York, 2004.
3.
FloridaR., GuldenT., and MellanderC.The Rise of the Mega-Region. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2008, pp. 459–476.
4.
China National Development and Reform Commission. The Trend of China's Economy and Regional Development During the 11th Five Year Plan, Report of National Strength [in Chinese]. http://www.fsa.gov.cn/web_db/sdzg2005/map/CGL/glbg-002.htm. Accessed July 2007.
YangJ.Transportation Implications of Land Development in a Transitional Economy: Evidence from Housing Relocation in Beijing, China. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1954, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 7–14.
7.
YangJ.Spatial and Social Characteristics of Urban Transportation in Beijing. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2193, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 59–67.
8.
YangJ., and GakenheimerR.Assessing the Mobility and Accessibility Consequences of Land Use Transformation in Urban China. Habitat International, Vol. 31, 2007, pp. 345–353.
9.
ZegrasP. C., ChenY., and GrütterJ. M.Behavior-Based Transportation Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Under the Clean Development Mechanism: Transport-Efficient Development in Nanchang, China. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2114, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 38–46.
10.
GottmannJ.Megalopolis or the Urbanization of the Northeastern Seaboard. Economic Geography, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1957, pp. 189–200.
11.
RossC., ed. Megaregions: Planning for Global Competitiveness, Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2009.
12.
GaoR., and ZhangJ.The Shanghai Megaregion, Shanghai Social Science Press, Shanghai, China, 2004.
13.
Regional Plan Association.America 2050: A Prospectus.New York, 2006.
14.
European Commission. European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union.Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1999.
15.
MetroNation: How U.S. Metropolitan Areas Fuel American Prosperity.Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program, Washington, D.C., 2007.
16.
European Commission. Panorama of Transport, 5th ed. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, Belgium, 2007.
WallisA. D.Inventing Regionalism: The First Two Waves. National Civic Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, 1994, 159–175.
19.
SassenS.Megaregions: Benefits Beyond Sharing Trains and Parking Lots? In The Economic Geography of Megaregions (GoldfeldK. S., ed.), Princeton University, Princeton, N.J., 2007, pp. 59–84.
20.
Tewdwr-JonesM., and WilliamsR. H.The European Dimension of British Planning.Spon Press, London, 2001.
21.
SaletW., ThornleyA., and KreukelsA.Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning: Comparative Case Studies of European City-Regions.Spon Press, London and New York, 2003.
22.
GutiérrezJ., GonzálezR., and GómezG.The European High-Speed Train Network: Predicted Effects on Accessibility Patterns. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1996, pp. 227–238.
Gómez-IbáñezJ. A., and DeRusG., eds. Competition in the Railway Industry: An International Comparative Analysis.Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, Mass., 2006.
ConkeyC., and GladerP.Mass-Transit Projects Fared Well at Polls. Wall Street Journal, Nov. 12, 2008.
29.
ChenX., and ZhangM.High-Speed Rail Project Development Processes in the United States and China. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2159, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 9–17.
30.
AmekudziA. A., Thomas-MobleyL., and RossC.Transportation Planning and Infrastructure Delivery in Major Cities and Megacities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1997, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2007, pp. 17–23.
31.
CarbonellA., and YaroR. D.American Spatial Development and the New Megalopolis. Land Lines, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2005.
32.
RossC., BarringerJ., YangJ., WooM., DoyleJ., and WestH.Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning. FHWA-BAA-HEPP-02-2007. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/megaregions.htm.
