Calibration of the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guidefor Flexible Pavement Design in Arkansas

Abstract

Because of potential differences between national and local conditions, the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) should be calibrated to a local level. Arkansas has invested heavily in efforts to implement the MEPDG. This paper summarizes the initial local calibration of flexible pavement models in the MEPDG for Arkansas. Data from the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) database and local pavement management system (PMS) were used. The solver function in Microsoft Excel was used to optimize the coefficients for alligator cracking. Iterative runs of the MEPDG by means of discrete calibration coefficients were conducted to optimize rutting models. In general, the alligator cracking and rutting models are improved by calibration. However, a question remains about the suitability of the calibrated models for routine design. Many default values were used in the MEPDG because of a lack of data. It is recommended that additional sites be established and a more robust data collection procedure be implemented for future calibration efforts. The difference in the definitions of transverse cracking between the MEPDG and the LTPP may be critical to data collection and identification. Thermal cracking should be specifically identified in a transverse cracking survey to calibrate the transverse cracking model in MEPDG. The procedure using LTPP and PMS data for local calibration of the MEPDG in Arkansas is established. Additional development of database software for data manipulation, preprocessing, and quality control—under way in Arkansas—will significantly streamline the calibration process.