This paper presents a new direct tensile test to evaluate cracking resistance of asphalt concrete mixtures: the Fénix test. First, the literature on cracking factors and mechanisms of bituminous mixtures, as well as current tests to measure cracking properties, is reviewed. Next, the Fénix test is described, and some initial experimental results of the influence of variables, such as binder type and content and test temperature, are provided. Additionally, test repeatability and sensitivity are statistically analyzed. Correlations between parameters obtained by the Fénix test and the three-point bending beam fatigue test are also shown. Finally, the main conclusions of this work are summarized. These conclusions confirm that the Fénix test is a practical and efficient method for characterizing cracking behavior of asphalt concrete mixtures as far as the studied variables are concerned.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MolenaarA. A. A.Fatigue and Reflective Cracking Due to Traffic. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 53, 1984, pp. 440–474.
2.
MyersL. A., RoqueR., and BirgissonB.Propagation Mechanisms for Surface-Initiated Longitudinal Wheelpath Cracks. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1778, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 113–122.
3.
The Asphalt Handbook, 7th ed. Asphalt Institute Manual Series No. 4 (MS-4). Asphalt Institute, Lexington, Ky., 2007.
4.
KohC., LoppG., and RoqueR.Development of a Dog-Bone Direct Tension Test (DBDT) for Asphalt Concrete. Proc. 7th International RILEM Symposium on Advanced Testing and Characterization of Bituminous Materials, Rhodes, Greece, Vol. 1, 2009, pp. 585–596.
5.
OllerS.Fractura Mecánica. Un Enfoque Global.Centro Internacional de Métodos Numéricos, Barcelona, Spain, 2001.
6.
KarihalooB.Fracture Mechanics and Structural Concrete.John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1995.
7.
MartínezF., and AngeloneS.Determination of Fracture Parameters of Asphalt Mixes by the Repeated Indirect Tensile Test. Proc. 6th International RILEM Symposium on Performance Testing and Evaluation of Bituminous Materials, Zurich, Switzerland, 2003, pp. 387–391.
8.
FakhriM., FarokhiM., and KheiryP. T.Modeling of Top-Down Cracking (TDC) Propagation in Asphalt Concrete Pavements Using Fracture Mechanics Theory. Proc. 7th International RILEM Symposium on Advanced Testing and Characterization of Bituminous Materials, Rhodes, Greece, Vol. 2, 2009, pp. 681–692.
9.
BrahamA., PetersonC., and ButtlarW.Mixed-Mode Cracking in Asphalt Concrete. Proc. 7th International RILEM Symposium on Advanced Testing and Characterization of Bituminous Materials, Rhodes, Greece, Vol. 2, 2009, pp. 785–793.
10.
PaisJ., and PereiraP.Prediction of Existing Reflective Cracking Potential of Flexible Pavements. In Reflective Cracking in Pavements: Research in Practice (Abd El HalimA. O., TaylorD. A., MohamedEl H. H., eds.), RILEM, 2000, pp. 155–174.
11.
Pérez JiménezF., Miró RecasensR., and Fonseca RodríguezC.Essai BTD pour la Détermination de la Ténacité et Résistance à la Fissuration des Mélanges Bitumineux. Mechanical Test for Bituminous Materials, 2000, pp. 391–396.
12.
MolenaarA., ScarpasA., LiuX., and ErkensS.Semi-Circular Bending Test: Simple but Useful?Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 71, 2002, pp. 795–815.
13.
WagonerM., ButtlarW., and PaulinoG.Disk-Shaped Compact Tension Test for Asphalt Concrete Fracture. Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2005, pp. 270–277.
14.
LiX., BrahamA., MarasteanuM., ButtlarW., and WilliamsR.Effect of Factors Affecting Fracture Energy of Asphalt Concrete at Low Temperature. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 9, 2008, pp. 397–416.
15.
KimH., PartlM. N., WagonerM. P., and ButtlarW. G.Size Effect Investigation on Fracturing of Asphalt Concrete Using the Cohesive Softening Discrete Element Model. Proc. 7th International RILEM Symposium on Advanced Testing and Characterization of Bituminous Materials, Rhodes, Greece, Vol. 2, 2009, pp. 827–836.
16.
MullM., StuartK., and YehiaA.Fracture Resistance Characterization of Chemically Modified Crumb Rubber Asphalt Pavement. Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 37, 2002, pp. 557–566.
17.
ChenX., LiH., and QianZ.On the Fracture Properties of Epoxy Asphalt Mixture with SCB Test. Proc. 7th International RILEM Symposium on Advanced Testing and Characterization of Bituminous Materials, Rhodes, Greece, Vol. 1, 2009, pp. 531–540.
18.
Pérez-JiménezF., MiróR., and MartínezA.Analysis of the Fatigue Process in Bituminous Mixes: Fatigue Critical Strain. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
19.
MaupinG. W., and FreemanJ. R.Simple Procedure for Fatigue Characterization of Bituminous Concrete. FHWA-RD-76-102. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1976.
20.
CarpenterS.Fatigue Performance of IDOT Mixtures. Report FHWA-ICT-07-007. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
