Balancing Private and Public Interests in Public–Private Partnership Contracts through Optimization of Equity Capital Structure

Abstract

Capital structure and revenue-sharing agreements lie in the essence of balancing public and private interests in public–private partnership (PPP) contracts. In the United States, many PPP projects may not be fully self-financed through tolls or other user fees because of insufficient revenue streams. With a limited debt capacity secured by toll revenues, most PPP projects must be supported by both private equity investments and public funds. The equity structure is critical in a PPP contract because it implies risk and profit sharing and therefore provides a mechanism for private incentive and protection of the public interest. This paper presents a structured approach to determining the debt–equity investment in PPP projects. Scenarios are generated by using linear programming and probability programming models to reach the optimal equity structure under risk and uncertainty. The I-10 connector project is used as a case study to demonstrate the optimization process. The model is especially useful for public agencies to (a) estimate the range of private equity investment, (b) determine the target equity structure, and (c) document the benefits and costs of private financing for a successful PPP contract.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Public–Private Partnerships: The Government's Approach. The Stationery Office, HM Treasury, United Kingdom Government, London, 2000.

Report to Congress on Public–Private Partnerships. U.S. Department of Transportation, Dec. 2004.

Abdel

A. M.

Successful Delivery of Public–Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Vol. 133, No. 12, 2007, pp. 918–931.

AECOM. Case Studies of Transportation Public–Private Partnerships in the United States. Final report, Work Order 05-002. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/PPP/pdf/int_ppp_case_studies_final_report_7-7-07.pdf.

Mallet

W. J.

Public–Private Partnerships in Highway and Transit Infrastructure. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Order Code RL34567, Washington, D.C. July 9, 2008.

Brown

J. W.

, Pieplow

, Driskell

, Gaj

, Garvin

M. J.

, Holcombe

, Saunders

, Seiders

, and Smith

Public–Private Partnerships for Highway Infrastructure: Capitalizing on International Experience. Report FHWA-PL-09-010. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, March 2009.

Sanghi

, Sundakov

, and Hankinson

Designing and Using Public–Private Partnership Units in Infrastructure: Lessons from Case Studies Around the World. Gridlines, No. 27, Sept. 2007, pp. 1–5. http://www.ppiaf.org/documents/gridlines/27PPP.pdf.

Zhang

X. Q.

, and Kumaraswamy

M. M.

Procurement Protocols for Public–Private Partnered Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 127, No. 5, 2001, pp. 351–358.

Linderberger

M. A.

Long a Leader in Toll-Road Pursuits, Texas Taps the Brakes on Efforts. Dallas Morning News, July 5, 2009.

10.

Highway Public-Private Partnerships: Securing Potential Benefits and Protecting the Public Interest Could Result from More Rigorous Up-Front Analysis. GAO-08-1052T, U.S. Government Accountability Office, July 24, 2008.

11.

Pakkala

Innovative Project Delivery Methods for Infrastructure: An International Perspective. ISBN 952-5408-05-1, Finnish Road Enterprise, Helsinki, Finland, 2002.

12.

Koppinen

, and Lahdenpera

Realized Economic Efficiency of Road Project Delivery Systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2007, pp. 321–329.

13.

Yescombe

E. R.

Public–Private Partnerships Principles of Policy and Finance. Elsevier, London, 2007.

14.

Zhang

Paving the Way for Public–Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 6, 2005, pp. 631–644.

15.

AECOM. User Guidebook on Implementing Public–Private Partnerships for Transportation Infrastructure Projects in the United States. Final report, Work Order 05-002. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, July 2007.

16.

Akintoye

, Hardcastle

, Beck

, Chinyio

, and Asenova

Achieving Best Value in Private Finance Initiative Project Procurement. Journal of Construction Management and Economics. Vol. 21, No. 5, 2003, pp. 461–470.

17.

Mythbusters: Facts and Fictions About Public–Private Partnerships. Department of Treasury and Finance, State Government of Victoria, Australia. http://www.yellowdocuments.com/9956065-mythbusters-facts-and-fictions. Accessed July 15, 2009.

18.

Gross

M. E.

, and Garvin

M. J.

Approaches for Structuring Concession Lengths and Toll Rates for Transportation Infrastructure PPPs. Proc., 2009 Construction Research Congress (CD-ROM), Seattle, Wash., ASCE, Reston, Va., 2009, pp. 191–200.

19.

Zhang

Financial Viability Analysis and Capital Structure Optimization in Privatized Public Infrastructure Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Vol. 131, No. 6, 2005, pp. 656–668.

20.

Chiara

, and Garvin

Variance Models for Project Financial Risk Analysis with Applications to Greenfield BOT Highway Projects. Journal of Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 26, No. 9, 2008, pp. 925–939.

21.

Brandao

L. E. T.

, and Saraiva

The Option Value of Government Guarantees in Infrastructure Projects. Journal of Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 26, No. 11, 2008, pp. 1171–1180.

22.

Liu

, and Cheah

C. Y. J.

Real Option Application in PPP–PFI Project Negotiation. Journal of Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2009, pp. 331–342.

23.

Zhang

Criteria for Selecting the Private-Sector Partner in Public–Private Partnerships. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Vol. 131, No. 1, 2005, pp. 71–80.

24.

Finnerty

J. D.

Project Financing, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N.J., 2007.

25.

Phillips

G. M.

Interpolation and Approximation by Polynomials. Springer, New York, 2003.