The New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) funded a project executed by a team from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute to perform a comprehensive scan of emerging technologies that could affect transportation in the New York City metropolitan region in the next 20 years. A primary goal of the technology scan is to develop a document that serves as a one-stop shop for emerging technology that may be considered for implementation by different transportation agencies in the NYMTC region. This paper briefly presents the different emerging technologies, their characteristics, and important results from the project pertaining to congestion reduction and safety objectives.
BlytheP. T.Congestion Charging: Technical Options for the Delivery of Future UK Policy.Transportation Research A, Policy and Practice, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 571–587.
3.
MatsudaW., TsukadaY., and KikuchiM.Flexible Charge Measures Used on Toll Roads: An Analysis of Demonstration Projects in Japan. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1932, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 137–146.
4.
DePalmaA.Modelling and Evaluation of Road Pricing in Paris.Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2006, pp. 115–126.
5.
HinL. T. W., and SubramaniamR.Congestion Control of Heavy Vehicles Using Electronic Road Pricing: The Singapore Experience.Heavy Vehicle Systems, Vol. 13, Nos. 1/2, 2006, pp. 37–55.
6.
IeromonachouP., PotterS., and WarrenJ. P.Norway's Urban Toll Rings: Evolving Towards Congestion Charging?Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2006, pp. 367–378.
UkkusuriS. V., KaroonsoontawongA., WallerT., and KockelmanK. M.Congestion Pricing Technologies: Synthesis and Evaluation Framework. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
10.
BielefeldtC., KosmatopousonE., RichardsA., and CondieH.Signal Management in Real Time for Urban Traffic NETworks: Comparative Evaluations Results and Cost Benefit Analysis. Project Report. European Community, Information Society Technology, 2004.
11.
YuX.-H., and ReckerW. W.Stochastic Adaptive Control Model for Traffic Signal Systems.Transportation Research C, Vol. 14, 2006, pp. 263–282.
12.
RitchieS. G., ParkS., OhC., JengS.-T., and TokA.Anonymous Vehicle Tracking for Real-Time Freeway and Arterial Street Performance Measurement.California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Berkeley, 2005.
SmithH. R., HemilyB., IvanovicM. and Gannett Fleming, Inc. Transit Signal Priority (TSP): A Planning and Implementation Handbook.FTA, 2005.
15.
ToddM., BarthM., EichlerM., DaganzoC., and ShaheenS. A.Enhanced Transit Strategies: Bus Lanes with Intermittent Priority and ITS Technology Architectures for TOD Enhancement. UCB-ITS-PRR-2006-02 California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Berkeley, 2006.
16.
ShaheenS. A., RodierC. J., and SeeligJ.EasyConnect II: Integrating Transportation, Information, and Energy Technologies at Transit Oriented Developments. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
17.
Advanced Traveler Information Systems: Choosing the Route to Traveler Information Systems Deployment: Factors for Creating Public-Private Business Plans (Action Guide).Intelligent Transportation Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1998. www.fhwa.dot.gov/tfhrc/safety/pubs/its/generalits/choosette.pdf.
ShladoverS. E.Preparing the Way for Vehicle-Infrastructure Integration. UCB-ITS-PRR-2005-31. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Berkeley, 2005.
21.
DongX., LiK., MisenerJ., VaraiyaP., and ZhangW.Expediting Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (EVII). UCB-ITS-PRR-2006-20. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Berkeley, 2006.
WaltonC. M., PersadK., and WangZ.Use of Traveler Information to Improve Texas Transportation Network Operations in the Context of Toll Roads.Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2007. www.utexas.edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/0_5079_1.pdf.
CampbellJ. L., RichardC. M., BrownJ. L., and McCallumM.Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factors Insights and Lessons Learned.NHTSA, 2007.
26.
TalmadgeS., DixonD., QuonB., and TRW Space, and Electronics Group. Development of Performance Specifications for Collision Avoidance Systems for Lane Change, Merging and Backing. Interim Report DOT HS 808. Department of Transportation, 1997.
27.
JulaH., KosmatopoulosE. B., and IoannouP. A.Collision Avoidance Analysis for Lane Changing and Merging.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2000, pp. 2295–2308.
AWAKE—System for Effective Assessment of Driver Vigilance and Warning According to Traffic Risk Estimation.European Commission, Information Society Technologies, 2004. www.awake-eu.org/index.html.
31.
HorowitzR., SunX., MuñozL., SkabardonisA., VaraiyaP., ZhangM., and MaJ.Design, Field Implementation and Evaluation of Adaptive Ramp Metering Algorithms. Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2005-2. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Berkeley, 2005.
32.
ChiuY.-C., LogmanH., ChiuM.-N., SunkaraA., and HaasC.Guidebook for Selecting Cost-Effective Wireless Communication Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems.Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2005. www.utexas.edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/0_4449_P1.pdf.
RahmanS. U., and HengartnerU.Secure Crash Reporting in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. Proc., 3rd International on Securing and Privacy in Communication Networks, Nice, France, Sept. 17–21, 2007. www.cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2007/cacr2007-11.pdf.
35.
PersadK., WaltonC. M., and HussainS.Electronic Vehicle Identification: Industry Standards, Performance, and Privacy Issues.Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2007. www.utexas.edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/0_5217_P2.pdf.
TCRP Report 94: Fare Policies, Structures and Technologies: Update.Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
38.
IsekiH., YohA. C., and TaylorB. D.Survey on Status of Knowledge and Interest of Smartcard Fare Collection Systems Among US Transit Agencies. UCB-ITS-PRR-2006-12. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Berkeley, 2006.
KaisM. J., ParentM., and MasakiI.A Binocular Vision System for Automated Vehicles.INRIA and MIT Intelligent Transportation Research Center, Cambridge, Mass., 2002.
41.
Vision Systems for Intelligent Vehicles: Intelligent Cruise Control, Obstacle Detection: and Reliable Lane Sensing.MIT Intelligent Transportation Research Center, Cambridge, Mass., 2003.
42.
ShladoverS. E., LuX.-Y., SongB., DickeyS., NowakowskiC., HowellA., BuF., MarcoD., TanH.-S., and NelsonD.Demonstration of Automated Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Research Report UCB-ITS-2005-23. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Berkeley, 2006.
43.
CarnegieJ. A., and HoffmanP. S.Viability of Personal Rapid Transit in New Jersey.New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Research and New Jersey Transit, Trenton, 2007. faculty.washington.edu/jbs/itrans/big/PRTfinalreport.pdf.
