The goal of this paper is to explore rationales for mitigating privacy loss in intelligent transportation systems and to provide an overview of methods proposed to accomplish this mitigation. The limitations and potential benefits of both technological and policy-oriented approaches are examined, and potential approaches to merging the two are explored in relation to the proposed vehicle–infrastructure integration initiative program.
EdwardsS., and BlytheP.Pervasive Computing: Thoughts on Applications in Transport. Presented at Pervasive Computing Workshop, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom, 2005.
3.
GarfinkelS.Why Driver Privacy Must Be a Part of ITS. In Converging Infrastructures: Intelligent Transportation and the National Information Infrastructure (BranscombL. M., and KellerJ. H., eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1996, pp. 324–340.
4.
BhaskarP., and AhamedS. I.Privacy in Pervasive Computing and Open Issues. Presented at 2nd International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, April 10–13, 2007, Vienna, Austria.
5.
Paton-SimpsonE.Privacy and the Reasonable Paranoid: The Protection of Privacy in Public Places.University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 50, No. 3. 2000, pp. 305–346.
6.
ClarkeR.How to Ensure that Privacy Concerns Don't Undermine e-Transport Investments. Presented at AIC e-Transport Conference, July 27–28, 2000, Melbourne, Australia.
7.
HallR. W., and IntiharC.Commercial Vehicle Operations: Government Interfaces and Intelligent Transportation Systems. Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-97-12. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Berkeley, 1997, p. 32.
8.
HohB., GruteserM., XiongH., and AlrabadyA.Enhancing Security and Privacy in Traffic-Monitoring Systems.Pervasive Computing, IEEE, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2006, pp. 38–46.
9.
DötzerF.Privacy Issues in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. Presented at Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Cavtat, Croatia, 2005, pp. 197–209.
10.
ShaK., XiY., ShiW., SchwiebertL., and ZhangT.Adaptive Privacy-Preserving Authentication in Vehicular Networks. Presented at Vehicle comm: The International Workshop on Vehicle Communications and Applications, London, 2006.
11.
Fair Information and Privacy Principles. Adopted Jan. 11, 2001. Intelligent Transportation Society of America, Washington, D.C.www.itsa.org/Fair_Privacy.html.
12.
BriggsV., and WaltonC. M.The Implications of Privacy Issues for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Data. Research Report SWUTC/00/472840-00075-1. Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Austin, Tex., 2000.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration: What It Is.USDOT Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Washington, D.C., 2008. www.its.dot.gov/itsnews/fact_sheets/vii.htm.
18.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration: Privacy Policies Framework Version 1.0.2.Institutional Issues Subcommittee of the National VII Coalition, Feb. 16, 2007.
