QuickZone Improvement for Rural Freeway and Model Validation

Abstract

This review indicated that in QuickZone 2.0 a deterministic queuing model is applied to calculate the delays for oversaturated conditions; stochastic and speed reduction delays were not included. Data collected from rural freeways in Mississippi show that saturated and oversaturated traffic flow may not occur in work zones. For situations like this, the delay components that are not included in QuickZone are significant. The current delay model of QuickZone needs improvement. This paper describes a model improvement made to QuickZone. The improvement considers delays from the deceleration before a work zone, slow-moving traffic along the work zone, acceleration after the work zone, and stochastic delays within the work zone area. The Excel Visual Basic Application implementation of the model in QuickZone is discussed in this paper. Traffic flow parameters such as speed and volume of more than 10 work zones in the rural area of Mississippi were collected to verify the newly improved QuickZone in undersaturated conditions; CORSIM, traffic simulation software sponsored by FHWA, was utilized to compare the delay from the improved QuickZone for the work zones in oversaturated conditions. Verification results from the numerical examples showed that the improved QuickZone provided more reasonable delay estimations than the original version did, especially for rural work zones in under-saturated conditions. Therefore, the improved QuickZone can capture the delays in undersaturated and oversaturated conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/resources/facts_stats.htm. Accessed June 2007.

FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Work Zone Safety and Mobility (final rule). Report FHWA-2001-11131. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/resources/final_rule.htm. Accessed April 2006.

ITS Benefits Database, Automated Work Zone Information System (AWIS), California. http://benefitcost.its.dot.gov/ITS/benecost.nsf/ByLink/BOTM-July2006. Accessed June 2006.

Chitturi

, and Benekohal

Comparison of Queue Length Estimates from QUEWZ, FRESIM, and QuickZone with Field Data. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. www.ite.org/Conference/Presentations/Session27-Benekohal.ppt. Accessed June 2006.

Keenan

Work Zones That Work.

Public Roads, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2004. www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/04nov/04.htm.

Chitturi

, and Benekohal

R. F.

Comparison of QUEWZ, FRESIM, and QuickZone with Field Data for Work Zones, Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Work Zone & Traffic Analysis/Management. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/traffic_analysis.htm. Accessed June 2006.

Chien

S. I.-J.

, and Chowdhury

S. M.

Simulation-Based Estimates of Delays at Freeway Work Zones, In 80th Annual Meeting Preprint (CD-ROM), Washington, D.C., 2001.

Benekohal

, and Wang

Relationship Between Initial Speed and Speed Inside a Highway Work Zone. In Transportation Research Record 1442, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 41–48.

10.

Jiang

Estimation of Traffic Delays and Vehicle Queues at Freeway Work Zones.

Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2001, pp. 65–81.

11.

MitreTek Systems. QuickZone Delay Estimation Program Version 0.99, User Guide. Falls Church, Va., March 2001.

12.

MitreTek Systems. QuickZone Delay Estimation Program Version 2.0, User Guide. Falls Church, Va., February 2005.