Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Ensuring coverage of cell phone–only respondents in survey samples is becoming more important in transportation surveys. Various sampling approaches are available to accommodate this requirement. This paper compares and contrasts the efficiencies and outcomes associated with two of them: (a) the active contact method using a sample of cell phone numbers and (b) passive contact method using a sample of postal service addresses. The efficiency of the samples was evaluated on measures such as data collection efforts, response rates, and cost per interview. The characteristics of respondents reached via each of the sample types based on telephone ownership patterns were contrasted with demographic characteristics of cell-only respondents. Sizes of both samples were quite large and provided significant methodological insights. These insights have important implications for transportation surveys that use either sampling approach to ensure coverage of cell-only respondents.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blumberg

, and Luke

Wireless Substitution: Preliminary Data from the January–June 2006 National Health Interview Survey. www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/wireless2006/wireless2006.htm.

Blumberg

, and Luke

Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates Based on Data from the National Health Interview Survey, July–December 2006. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless200705.pdf.

Blumberg

, and Luke

Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates Based on Data from the National Health Interview Survey, July–December 2007. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wire-less200805.pdf.

Link

M. W.

, Battaglia

M. P.

, Frankel

M. R.

, Osborn

, and Mokdad

A. H.

A Comparison of Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Versus Random-Digit Dialing (RDD) For General Population Surveys.

Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2008, pp. 6–27.

Kulp

D. W.

, Brick

J. M.

, and Fahimi

Biases in RDD Sampling: a 21st-Century Digital World Reassessment. Presented at 63rd American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, New Orleans, La., 2008.

AAPOR Cell Phone Task Force. Guidelines and Considerations for Survey Researchers When Planning and Conducting RDD and Other Telephone Surveys in the U.S. With Respondents Reached via Cell Phone Numbers. AAPOR, April 2008. www.aapor.org/uploads/Final_AAPOR_Cell_Phone_TF_report_041208.pdf.

Steeh

A New Era for Telephone Surveys. Presented at Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, Ariz., 2004.

Brick

J. M.

, Brick

P. D.

, Dipko

, Presser

, Tucker

, and Yuan

Cell Phone Survey Feasibility in the U.S.: Sampling and Calling Cell Numbers Versus Landline Numbers,

Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 71, 2007, pp. 23–39.

Iannacchione

V. G.

, Staab

J. M.

, and Redden

D. T.

Evaluating the Use of Residential Mailing Addresses in a Metropolitan Household Survey.

Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 76, 2003, pp. 202–210.

10.

O'Muircheartaigh

, Eckman

, and Weiss

Traditional and Enhanced Field Listing for Probability Sampling.

Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Methodology Section, Vol. 25, 2000, pp. 63–67.

11.

Staab

J. M.

, and Iannacchione

V. G.

Evaluating the Use of Residential Mailing Addresses in a National Household Survey.

Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Methodology Section, Vol. 40, 2004, pp. 28–33.

12.

Link

M. W.

, Battaglia

, Giambo

, Frankel

, and Mokdad

Assessment of Address Frame Replacements for RDD Sampling Frames. Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, Fla., 2005.

13.

AAPOR Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 5th ed. AAPOR, Lenexa, Kan., 2008.

Efficiency and Effectiveness of Cell Phone Samples in Transportation Surveys

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References