This paper introduces a Bayesian accident risk analysis framework that integrates accident frequency and its expected consequences into the hot spot identification process. The Bayesian framework allows the introduction of uncertainty not only in the accident frequency and severity model parameters but also in key variables such as vehicle occupancy levels and severity weighting factors. For modeling and estimating the severity levels of each individual involved in an accident, a Bayesian multinomial model is proposed. For modeling accident frequency, hierarchical Poisson models are used. How the framework can be implemented to compute alternative relative and absolute measures of total risk for hot spot identification is described. To illustrate the proposed approach, a group of highway–railway crossings from Canada is used as an application environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SchluterP. J., DeelyJ. J., and NicholsonA. J.Ranking and Selecting Motor Vehicle Accident Sites by Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Model.Statistician, Vol. 46, No. 3, 1997, pp. 293–316.
2.
HeydeckerB. G., and WuJ.Identification of Sites for Accident Remedial Work by Bayesian Statistical Methods: An Example of Uncertain Inference.Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 32, 2001, pp. 859–869.
3.
HauerE., KononovJ., AlleryB., and GriffithM. S.Screening the Road Network for Sites with Promise. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 27–32.
4.
HauerE., and PersaudB. N.How to Estimate the Safety of Rail–Highway Grade Crossings and the Safety Effects of Warning Devices. In Transportation Research Record 1114, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 131–140.
5.
PersaudB., LyonC., and NguyenT.Empirical Bayes Procedure for Ranking Sites for Safety Investigation by Potential for Safety Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1665, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 7–12.
6.
MiaouS. P., and SongJ. J.Bayesian Ranking of Sites for Engineering Safety Improvement: Decision Parameter, Treatability Concept, Statistical Criterion and Spatial Dependence.Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, 2005, pp. 699–720.
7.
Miranda-MorenoL. F., FuL., SaccomannoF. F., and LabbeA.Alternative Risk Models for Ranking Locations for Safety Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 1–8.
8.
ChengW., and WashingtonS. P.Experimental Evaluation of Hotspot Identification Methods.Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, 2005, pp. 870–881.
9.
NassarS., SaccomannoF. F., and ShortreedJ. H.Disaggregate Analysis of Road Accident Severities.International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 6, 1994, pp. 815–826.
10.
SaccomannoF. F., FuL., and Miranda-MorenoL. F.Risk-Based Model for Identifying Highway–Rail Grade Crossing Blackspots. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1862, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 127–135.
11.
MiltonJ. C., ShankarV. N., and ManneringF. L.Highway Accident Severities and the Mixed Logit Model: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis.Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 260–266.
12.
EluruN., BhatC. R., and HensherD. A.A Mixed Generalized Ordered Response Model for Examining Pedestrian and Bicyclist Injury Severity Level in Traffic Crashes.Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2008, pp. 1033–1054.
13.
ParkE. S., and LordD.Multivariate Poisson–Lognormal Models for Jointly Modeling Crash Frequency by Severity. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2019, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 1–6.
14.
LevineN., and WachsM.Factors Affecting Vehicle Occupancy Measurement.Transportation Research A, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1998, pp. 215–229.
15.
ZaloshnjaE., MillerT., CouncilF., and PersaudB.Crash Cost in the United States by Crash Geometry.Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, 2006, pp. 644–651.
16.
Miranda-MorenoL. F., LabbeA., and FuL.Multiple Bayesian Testing Procedures for Selecting Hazardous Sites.Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2007, pp. 1192–1201.
17.
LordD., and Miranda-MorenoL. F.Effects of Low Sample Mean Values and Small Sample Sizes on the Dispersion Parameter Estimation of Poisson–Gamma Models for Modeling Motor Vehicle Crashes: A Bayesian Perspective.Safety Science, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2008, pp. 751–770.
18.
Miranda-MorenoL. F.Statistical Models and Methods for Identifying Hazardous Locations for Safety Improvements. PhD thesis. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada,2006.
19.
FuL., SaccomannoF., Miranda-MorenoL. F., and ParkP. Y.-J.GradeX: Decision Support Tool for Hot Spot Identification and Countermeasure Analysis of Highway–Railway Grade Crossings. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
