Estimating Individual Speed-Spacing Relationship and Assessing Ability of Newell's Car-Following Model to Reproduce Trajectories

Abstract

Capturing variability within flow is an important task for traffic flow models. The linearity of the congested part of the fundamental diagram induces a linear speed-spacing relationship at an individual level, characterized by two parameters. This study assumes that most intervehicle variability can be accounted for by estimating these two parameters for each vehicle. Two methods are presented to quantify individual linear speed-spacing relationships. The first method is based on data: it estimates the speed-spacing relationship by fitting the experimental speed-spacing scatter plot with a straight line. The second method is based on simulation: it computes the optimum parameters so that the simulated trajectories obtained by Newell's car-following algorithm reproduce as closely as possible the experimental vehicle's trajectories. Both proposed methods are implemented on the Next Generation Simulation trajectory data set recorded on I-80. The individual parameters for the speed-spacing relationship are quantified, and their distributions are specified. The need to distinguish driver behavior on a lane-by-lane basis is discussed. The results tend to prove that taking into account individual variability between drivers can improve the accuracy of simulated trajectories.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cassidy

M. J.

and Mauch

An Observed Traffic Pattern in Long Freeway Queues. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 35, No. 2 2001, pp. 143–156.

Windover

J. R.

and Cassidy

M. J.

Some Observed Details of Freeway Traffic Evolution. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 35, No. 10 2001, pp. 881–894.

Chiabaut

Buisson

and Leclercq

Fundamental Diagram Estimation Through Passing Rate Measurements in Congestion. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

Coifman

B. A.

and Wang

Average Velocity of Waves Propagating Through Congested Freeway Traffic. Proc., 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory ( Mahmassani

H. S.

, ed.), 2005, pp. 165–179.

Cassidy

M. J.

and Windover

J. R.

Driver Memory: Motorist Selection and Retention of Individualized Headways in Highway Traffic. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 32, No. 2 1998, pp. 121–137.

Next Generation Simulation. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. 2006. ngsim.fhwa.dot.gov/.

Hall

F. L.

Traffic Stream Characteristics. In Traffic Flow Theory: A State of the Art Report—Revised Monograph on Traffic Flow Theory. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996.

Thiemann

Treiber

and Kesting

Estimating Acceleration and Lane-Changing Dynamics from Next Generation Trajectory Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2088, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 90–101.

Wagner

and Buisson

Calibration and Validation of Simulation Models: A Tutorial.

Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.

10.

Brockfeld

Kähne

R. D.

and Wagner

Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Models of Traffic Flow. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1934, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 179–187.

11.

Park

Won

and Yun

Application of Microscopic Simulation Model Calibration and Validation Procedure: Case Study of Coordinated Actuated Signal System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1978, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 113–122.

12.

Hoogendoorn

S. P.

Ossen

and Schreuder

Empirics of Multi-anticipative Car-Following Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1965, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 112–120.

13.

Punzo

and Tripodi

Steady-State Solutions and Multiclass Calibration of Gipps Microscopic Traffic Flow Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1999, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 104–114.

14.

Gurusinghe

G. S.

Nakatsuji

Azuta

Ranjitkar

and Tanaboriboon

Multiple Car-Following Data with Real-Time Kinematic Global Positioning System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1802, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 166–180.

15.

Brockfeld

Kähne

R. D.

and Wagner

Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Traffic Flow Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1876, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 62–70.

16.

Brackstone

and McDonald

The Validation of a Microscopic Simulation Model: A Methodological Case Study. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 11, No. 6 2003, pp. 463–479.

17.

Kesting

Treiber

and Helbing

Calibration of Car-Following Models Using Floating Car Data. Presented at Traffic and Granular Flow ‘07, Paris–Sud University, Orsay, 2007.

18.

Ossen

Hoogendoorn

S. P.

and Gorte

B. G. H.

Interdriver Differences in Car-Following: A Vehicle Trajectory–Based Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1965, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 121–129.

19.

Leclercq

Chiabaut

Laval

J. A.

and Buisson

Relaxation Phenomenon After Changing Lanes: Experimental Validation with NGSIM Data Set. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1999, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 79–85.

20.

Ahn

Cassidy

M. J.

and Laval

Verification of a Simplified Car-Following Theory. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 38, No. 5 2004, pp. 431–440.