Accuracy of Current Complex Modulus Selection Procedure from Vehicular Load Pulse

Abstract

The Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) uses the complex modulus to simulate the time and temperature dependency of hot-mix asphalt (HMA). To account for the time dependency of HMA, MEPDG recommends calculation of the frequency of the applied load as a function of the vehicle speed and the pavement structure. By this approach, the Odemark method of thickness equivalency is first used to transform the pavement structure into a single-layer system, and it is then assumed that the stress distribution occurs at a constant slope of 45° in the equivalent pavement structure. Concerns were raised that the current MEPDG methodology may be overestimating the frequency, which would result in underconservative distress predictions. Therefore, to evaluate the MEPDG methodology for calculation of the loading time, the results of the MEPDG procedure were compared with those of an advanced three-dimensional (3-D) finite element (FE) approach that simulates the approaching-leaving rolling wheel at a specific speed. The model developed accurately simulated actual tire rib sizes and the applicable contact pressure for each rib. In addition, laboratory-measured viscoelastic properties were incorporated into the FE model to describe the constitutive behavior of HMA. Comparison of these two methods shows that the frequencies calculated on the basis of the MEPDG procedure are greater than the ones determined by the 3-D FE method, which indicates that the loading time determined from MEPDG is not conservative. Ultimately, this would result in underestimation of the pavement response to a load and, therefore, greater errors in calibrations of the pavement response to field distress. Correction factors are thus presented to ensure the correctness of the loading time calculation in MEPDG. Adoption of the proposed factors within the MEPDG software does necessitate a recalibration of the performance models.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Guide for Mechanistic–Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. NCHRP 1-37A Final Report. ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division, Champaign, Ill., 2004. http:/www.trb.org/mepdg/guide.htm.

Thompson

M. R.

Carpenter

S. H.

Dempsey

B. J.

and Elliot

R. B.

Independent Review of the Recommended Mechanistic–Empirical Design Guide and Software. NCHRP Project 1-40A. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.

Al-Qadi

I. L.

Xie

and Elseifi

M. A.

Frequency Determination from Vehicular Loading Time Pulse to Predict Appropriate Complex Modulus in MEPDG. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists (forthcoming).

Huang

Y. H.

Pavement Analysis and Design, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2004.

Al-Qadi

I. L.

Elseifi

M. A.

and Yoo

P. J.

In Situ Validation of Mechanistic Pavement Finite Element Modeling. Proc., 2nd International Conference on Accelerated Pavement Testing ( Worel

and Faults

, eds.), Minneapolis, Minn., 2004.

Loulizi

Al-Qadi

I. L.

and Elseifi

M. A.

Difference Between In-Situ Flexible Pavement Measured and Calculated Stresses and Strains. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 7 2006, pp. 574–579.

Dongre

R. N.

Myers

L. A.

and D'Angelo

J. A.

Conversion of Testing Frequency to Loading Time: Impact on Performance Predictions Obtained from the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide.

Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.

ABAQUS Theory Manual, Version 6.5. Habbit, Karlsson & Sorenson, Inc., Pawtucket, R.I., 2005.

Al-Qadi

I. L.

and Yoo

P. J.

Effect of Surface Tangential Contact Stress on Flexible Pavement Response. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists, Vol. 76, 2007, pp. 663–692.

10.

Al-Qadi

I. L.

Yoo

P. J.

Elseifi

M. A.

and Janajreh

Effects of Tire Configurations on Pavement Damage. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists, Vol. 74, 2005, pp. 921–962.

11.

Yoo

P. J.

Al-Qadi

I. L.

Elseifi

M. A.

and Janajreh

Flexible Pavement Responses to Different Loading Amplitudes Considering Layer Interface Conditions and Lateral Shear Forces. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 1 2006, pp. 73–86.

12.

Bonaquist

and Christensen

D. W.

Practical Procedure for Developing Dynamic Modulus Master Curves for Pavement Structural Design. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1929, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 208–217.