Examination of Traveler Responses to Real-Time Information about Bus Arrivals using Panel Data

Abstract

In recent years, a considerable amount of money has been spent on intelligent transportation system projects for public transportation, most notably, real-time transit information systems. To date, strikingly few studies that have empirically investigated the effects of deployment of such a system have been completed. This paper examines the effects of real-time transit information on travelers’ behavior and psychology. The 2006-2007 University of Maryland (College Park) campus transportation panel survey data were used to examine how travelers responded to the ShuttleTrac system, a newly implemented real-time bus arrival information system for the university's shuttle service. Two fixed-effects models and five random-effects-ordered probit models were estimated to sort out the causal relations between ShuttleTrac system information use and two behavioral and five psychological indicators, respectively. It was found that use of the real-time information significantly increased the riders’ feelings of security about riding the bus after dark and boosted their overall level of satisfaction. However, it was not found to significantly increase travelers’ shuttle trip frequency, at least in the short term, perhaps because of a lack of enough time for adjustment of travel behavior. These results suggest that although transit agencies and scholars should not be too optimistic about achieving an immediate ridership increase by providing real-time information to travelers, they can expect positive psychological responses from transit riders.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

U.S. Urban Personal Vehicle & Public Transport Market Share from 1900. www.publicpurpose.com/ut-usptshare45.htm. Accessed July 10, 2007.

Cham

Darido

Jackson

Laver

and Schneck

Real-Time Bus Arrival Information Systems Return-on-Investment Study. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2006.

Lappin

and Bottom

Understanding and Predicting Traveler Response to Information: A Literature Review. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2001.

Smith

Atkins

and Sheldon

London Transport Buses: ATT in Action and the London Countdown Route 18 Project. Proc., First World Congress on Applications of Transport Telematics and Intelligent Vehicle–Highway Systems, Paris, 1994, pp. 3048–3055.

Mehndiratta

S. R.

Cluett

Kemp

and Lappin

Transit Watch: Bus Status Video Monitors in Seattle—Customer Satisfaction Evaluation. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2000.

Science Applications International Corporation. Oregon Regional Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Integration Program: Transit Tracker Information Displays. Draft Phase III Report. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.

Dziekan

and Vermeulen

Psychological Effects of and Design Preferences for Real-Time Information Displays. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 9, No. 1 2006, pp. 71–89.

Abdel-Aty

Kitamura

and Jovanis

Investigating Effect of Advanced Traveler Information on Commuter Tendency to Use Transit. In Transportation Research Record 1550, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 65–72.

Abdel-Aty

Using Ordered Probit Modeling to Study the Effect of ATIS on Transit Ridership. Transportation Research, Part C, Vol. 9, No. 4 2001, pp. 265–277.

10.

Reed

T. B.

and Levine

J. C.

Changes in Traveler Stated Preference for Bus and Car Modes Due to Real-Time Schedule Information: A Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 2 1997, pp. 25–47.

11.

Hickman

M. D.

and Wilson

N. H. M.

Passenger Travel Time and Path Choice Implications of Real-Time Transit Information. Transportation Research, Part C, Vol. 3, No. 4 1995, pp. 211–226.

12.

Mishalani

R. G.

Lee

and McCord

Evaluating Real-Time Bus Arrival Information Systems. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1731, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 81–87.

13.

Chorus

Molin

Van Wee

Arentze

and Timmermans

H. J. P.

Responses to Transit Information Among Car-Drivers: Regret-Based Models and Simulations. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 29, No. 4 2006, pp. 249–271.

14.

Allison

P. D.

Using Panel Data to Estimate the Effects of Events. Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 23, 1994, pp. 174–199.

15.

Greene

W. H.

Econometric Analysis, (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 2002.

16.

Karni

Salmon

and Sopher

Individual Sense of Fairness: An Experimental Study. Experimental Economics, Vol. 11, No. 2 2008, pp. 174–189.

17.

Frechette

G. R.

Random-Effects Ordered Probit. Stata Technical Bulletin, Vol. 59, 2001, pp. 23–27.

18.

Taylor

S. A.

and Fullerton

Waiting for Service: Perceptions Management of the Wait Experience. In Handbook of Services Marketing and Management Swarz

(T. A.

and Iacobucci

eds.), Sage Publications, London, 2000, pp. 171–190.

19.

Tang

and Thakuriah

An Analysis of Behavioral Responses to Real-Time Transit Information Systems. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Fort Worth, Tex., 2006.

20.

Toor

and Havlick

Transportation and Sustainable Campus Communities: Issues, Examples, Solutions. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2004.

21.

Brown

Hess

and Shoup

Fare-Free Public Transit at Universities: An Evaluation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 23, No. 1 2003, pp. 69–82.