Critical Factors Affecting Field Determination of Hot-Mix Asphalt Density Using Nonnuclear Devices

Abstract

Nonnuclear methods for the measurement of hot-mix asphalt (HMA) density offer the ability to take numerous density readings in a short time period, without the need for intensive licensing, training, and maintenance efforts common to nuclear gauges. The Pavement Quality Indicator (PQI) and the PaveTracker use electrical impedance to estimate density. Early models of these gauges were deemed inadequate for quality control and quality assurance testing, but improvements have been made to each. In this project, a ruggedness study was performed to evaluate the effects of gauge model, temperature, moisture, use of sand to fill surface voids, gauge orientation, number of replicate measurements, and gauge placement on two nonnuclear gauges. Significant factors arising from the ruggedness study were further investigated. Two 12.5-mm mixes and one 37.5-mm mix were evaluated, using 42 test locations. Gauge orientation was significant, suggesting that the test method protocol should specify gauge orientation with respect to the direction of paving. Four replicate measurements were deemed acceptable for producing a single reported result, and all sand and debris should be thoroughly brushed from the surface before testing. Moisture significantly affected the measured densities in some cases, most notably for the 37.5-mm test locations and for the PaveTracker device.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

TransTech Systems’ Pavement Quality Indicator (PQI) Application Brief. TransTech Systems, Inc., Schenectady, N.Y., Jan. 2003.

Model 2701-B PaveTracker™ Plus, Manual of Operation and Instruction. Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc., Research Triangle Park, N.C., June 2006.

Sargand

S. M.

Kim

and Farrington

S. P.

A Working Review of Available Non-Nuclear Equipment for Determining In-Place Density of Asphalt. Final Report for State Job 147960. Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment, Columbus, Dec. 2005.

Henault

J. W.

Field Evaluation of a Non-Nuclear Density Pavement Quality Indicator. Report 2227-F-01-3. Connecticut Department of Transportation, Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operations, Division of Research, Newington, June 2001.

Romero

Evaluation of Non-Nuclear Gauges to Measure Density of Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements. Pooled Fund Study, Final Report. University of Utah, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Salt Lake City, July 2002.

Sebesta

Zeig

and Scullion

Evaluation of Non-Nuclear Density Gauges for HMAC: Year 1 Report. Report FHWA/TX-04/0-4577-1. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Oct. 2003.

Rogge

D. F.

and Jackson

M. A.

Compaction and Measurement of Field Density for Oregon Open-Graded (F-Mix) Asphalt Pavement. Final Report SPR 386. Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, June 1999.

Liao

Sargand

S. M.

and Kim

Non-Nuclear Density Gauge Comparative Study for QC/QA in HMA Construction. Presented at 2006 Airfield and Highway Pavement Specialty Conference, American Society of Civil Engineers, Atlanta, Ga., 2006.

Hausman

J. J.

and Buttlar

W. G.

Analysis of TransTech Model 300 Pavement Quality Indicator: Laboratory and Field Studies for Determining Asphalt Pavement Density. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1813, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 191–200.

10.

Rao

Von Quintus

and Schmitt

R. L.

Calibration of Non-nuclear Density Gauge Data for Accurate In-Place Density Prediction. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2040, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 123–136.