Effect of Truck Lane Restrictions on Four-Lane Freeways in Mountainous Areas

Abstract

Several states have implemented truck lane restrictions in an attempt to improve safety and mobility on freeways. These restrictions have typically prohibited trucks from traveling in the median lane of freeways that have more than three lanes per direction. Virginia has recently implemented a new type of truck restriction that prohibits trucks traveling more than 15 mph below the posted speed limit from the left lane on four-lane interstate segments. This new restriction is primarily used in mountainous areas of the state where truck climbing lanes may be warranted but are not present. The results of a safety and operational evaluation of these truck lane restrictions were documented. Crash data were examined at 19 sites with restrictions. Likewise, operational data were collected at four sites with restrictions to assess compliance and the extent to which slow-moving trucks were impeding traffic flow. The safety analysis shows some positive trends in crash rates after implementation of the restrictions, but only the overall number of fatal and injury crashes showed a statistically significant decline. Although compliance with the restrictions was generally good, a number of slow-moving vehicles, including passenger cars, were still found to be impeding traffic in the left lane.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

A Policy on the Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.

Khoury

R. J.

VDOT Mobility Management Division Memorandum MM-330: Commercial Vehicle Restriction Signage. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, 2004.

Middleton

Fitzpatrick

Jasek

and Woods

Truck Accident Countermeasures on Urban Freeways. FHWA-RD-92-059. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1994.

Mugarula

and Mussa

R. N.

Evaluation of Truck Operating Characteristics on a Rural Interstate Freeway with Median Lane Truck Restriction. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1856, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 54–61.

Zavoina

M. C.

Urbanik

II and Hinshaw

Operational Evaluation of Truck Restrictions on I-20 in Texas. In Transportation Research Record 1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 24–31.

Corder

S. C.

and Borchardt

D. W.

Truck Lane Restrictions in Texas. Houston-Galveston Area Council: Partners in Safety. Houston, Tex., 2006.

Mannering

F. L.

Koehne

J. L.

and Araucto

Truck Restriction Evaluation: The Puget Sound Experience. WA-RD 307.1. Washington State Transportation Center, Seattle, 1993.

Hanscom

F. R.

Operational Effectiveness of Truck Lane Restrictions. In Transportation Research Record 1281, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 119–126.

Thornton

and Lyles

R. W.

Freeway Speed Zones: Safety and Compliance Issues. In Transportation Research Record 1560, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 65–72.

10.

Liu

G. X.

and Popoff

Provincial-Wide Travel Speed and Traffic Safety Study in Saskatchewan. In Transportation Research Record 1595, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 8–13.

11.

Hauer

Accidents, Overtaking and Speed Control. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 3, 1971, pp. 1–13.

12.

Garber

N. J.

and Ehrhart

A. A.

The Effect of Speed, Flow and Geometric Characteristics on Crash Rates for Different Types of Virginia Highways. VTRC 00-R15. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2000.

13.

Hauer

Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety. Pergamon, New York, 2002.