An Internet portal for public participation in transportation programming decisions is described. The Internet portal supports participation of large groups (e.g., 100 or more people) through cutting-edge online deliberation tools and a strategic process that fosters meaningful public involvement. The portal is described in the context of a five-step process that has been designed for a particular programming decision situation called a local option transportation tax. A transportation agency could develop a similar process for other programming decisions, such as the creation of a transportation improvement program. The portal can be used by an agency to create a program or merely as a focus-group activity or polling exercise. Various tools used by the portal and the five-step process are described with the help of selected screenshots of the user interface.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MatleyT. Public Involvement for Planning and Programming—There Is a Difference. TRB committee for Public Involvement. www.trbpi.com/index.asp?PageID=2&ArticleID=35. Accessed July 31, 2007.
2.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, (SAFETEA–LU). FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005.
3.
GrossardtT.BaileyK. and BrummJ.Structured Public Involvement: Problems and Prospects for Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1858, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 95–102.
4.
IrvinR. A. and StansburyJ.Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?Public Administration Review, Vol. 61, No. 42004, pp. 55–65.
5.
SmithS.NCHRP Report 435: Guidebook for Transportation Corridor Studies: A Process for Effective Decision Making.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.
6.
ApplegateJ.Beyond the Usual Suspects: The Use of Citizens Advisory Boards in Environmental Decisionmaking. Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 73, No. 31998, pp. 903–957.
7.
BosworthM.DonovanJ. and CoueyP.Portland Metro's Dream for Public Involvement. In Community Participation and Geographic Information SystemsCraig(W.HarrisT. and WeinerD. eds.). Taylor and Francis, London, 2002, pp. 125–136.
8.
Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1996.
9.
TaylorN.Mistaken Interests and the Discourse Model of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 64, No. 11998, pp. 64–75.
RennO.WeblerT. and WiedemannP.Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Vol. 10. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1995.
12.
DervinB.On Studying Information Seeking Methodologically: The Implications of Connecting Metatheory to Method. Information Processing and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 35, No. 61999, pp. 727–750.
13.
Public Involvement Techniques for Transportation Decision-Making. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996.
14.
GastilJ. and KelshawT.Public Meetings: A Sampler of Deliberative Forums that Bring Officeholders and Citizens Together.Charles Kettering Foundation, Dayton, Ohio, 2000.
NyergesT. and PatrickM.Rethinking Public Participation as Instant Access to Virtual Meetings. In Societies and Cities in the Age of Instant AccessMiller(H. ed.), Springer, New York, 2007, pp. 331–342.
17.
ArnsteinS.A Ladder of Citizen Participation. American Institute of Planners Journal, Vol. 35, No. 41969, pp. 216–224.
18.
RinnerC.Web-Based Spatial Decision Support: Status and Research Directions. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, Vol. 7, No. 12003, pp. 14–31.
19.
JankowskiP. and NyergesT.Geographic Information Systems for Group Decision Making: Towards a Participatory, Geographic Information Science.Taylor and Francis, London, 2001.
20.
CraigW.HarrisT. and WeinerD. (eds.). Community Participation and GIS. Taylor and Francis, London, 2002.
21.
CarverS.EvansA.KingstonR. and TurtonI.Public Participation. GIS and Cyberdemocracy: Evaluating On-Line Spatial Decision Support Systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 28, No. 62001, pp. 907–921.
22.
US Department of Transportation. FHWA/FTA Final Rule on Statewide and Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Programming and Congestion Management Processes/Systems. USDOT, Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 30. 2007.
23.
GoldmanT. and WachsM.A Quiet Revolution in Transportation Finance: The Rise of Local Option Transportation Taxes. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 12003, pp. 19–32.
24.
BealeH.BishopE. and MarleyW.How to Pass Local Option Taxes to Finance Transportation Projects. In Transportation Research Record 1558, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 74–82.
25.
WerbelR. and HaasP.Factors Influencing Voting Results of Local Transportation Funding Initiatives with a Substantial Rail Transit Component: Case Studies of Ballot Measures in Eleven Communities.Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, Calif., 2001.
26.
HannayR. and WachsM.Factors Influencing Support for Local Transportation Sales Tax Measures. Transportation, Vol. 34, 2007, pp. 17–35.
27.
AltshulerA. and LuberoffD.Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment.Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 2003.
28.
PryneE.You Build IT King County, Regional Transportation Package Game. Seattle Times, March 30, 2003.
29.
NyergesT.RamseyK. and WilsonM.Design Considerations for an Internet Portal to Support Public Participation in Transportation Improvement Decision Making. In Collaborative Geographic Information SystemsBalram(S. and DragicevicS. eds.). Idea Publishing, Hershey, Pa., 2006, pp. 208–230.
30.
KaufmanL. and RousueeuwP. J.Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis.John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1990.
31.
NeumannL. A.NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 243: Methods for Capital Programming and Project Selection.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997.
32.
MillerG.The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two. The Psychological Review, Vol. 63, 1956, pp. 81–97.
33.
DelbecqA. L.Van de VenA. H. and GustafsonD. H.Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes.Scott Foresman, Glenview, Ill., 1975.
