Corresponding Characteristics and Circumstances of Collision-Involved Pedestrians in Hawaii

Abstract

Correspondence analysis is used to explore the relationships between the characteristics and circumstances of collision-involved pedestrians in Hawaii. The purpose of this study is twofold. First, it is to apply and understand how best to use a powerful exploratory data technique (correspondence analysis) for safety research. The second purpose is to understand better the nature and causes of pedestrian accidents. The circumstances associated with pedestrian fault, serious injury, and the effects of location and temporal factors are examined. Correspondence analysis is a technique that allows one to examine the relationships between various discrete or categorical variables and to consider the effects of gender, age groupings, time, and location on pedestrian fault and injury. The technique is useful not only in clarifying the important relationships but also in designing appropriate strategies and interventions for the reduction of pedestrian accidents. The analysis suggests that greater emphasis be directed toward drivers, who are 13.8 times more likely to be classified as being at fault than the pedestrian they collide with. It is also evident that there are differences between seniors and other pedestrians in terms of injuries sustained. Moreover, specified programs might be targeted to men, children, and young adults.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Clausen

Applied Correspondence Analysis: An Introduction. In Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks, Calif., 1998.

Hill

Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method. Applied Statistics, Vol. 23, No. 3 1974, pp. 340–354.

Greenacre

Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. Academic Press, New York, 1984.

Benzecri

Correspondence Analysis Handbook. Dekker, New York, 1992.

SAS/STAT 9.1 Users Guide. SAS Institute, Inc., 2004, pp. 1067–1134.

Kim

Nitz

Richardson

and Li

. Personal and Behavioral Predictors of Automobile Crash and Injury Severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 4 1995, pp. 469–481.

Kim

Nitz

Richardson

and Li

. Analyzing the Relationship Between Crash Types and Injuries in Motor Vehicle Collisions in Hawaii. In Transportation Research Record 1467, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 9–13.

Kim

and Yamashita

. Using a K-means Clustering Algorithm to Examine Patterns of Pedestrian Accidents in Honolulu. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 41, No. 1 2007, pp. 69–89.

Traffic Safety Facts. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005.

10.

Kim

Nitz

Richardson

and Li

. Drivers at Fault: Influences of Age, Sex, and Vehicle Type. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 29, No. 3 1988, pp. 171–179.

11.

Kim

and Li

. Modeling Fault Among Bicyclists and Drivers Involved in Collisions in Hawaii, 1986–1991. In Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 75–80.

12.

Kim

and Boski

. Finding Fault in Motorcycle Crashes in Hawaii: Environmental, Temporal, Spatial, and Human Factors. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1779, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 182–188.

13.

Kim

Brunner

I. M.

and Yamashita

E. Y.

. The Blame Game: Modeling Fault Among Accident-Involved Pedestrians and Motorists in Hawaii. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.

14.

Kim

Brunner

I. M.

and Yamashita

E. Y.

. Use of Safety Viewgrams to Visualize Driver and Pedestrian Interactions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2002, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 72–77.