Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The simple productivity measures and hard constraints used in many paratransit vehicle scheduling software programs do not fully capture the interest of all the stakeholders in a typical paratransit organization (e.g., passengers, drivers, municipal government). As a result, many paratransit agencies still retain a human scheduler to look through all of the schedules to manually pick out impractical, unacceptable runs. (A run is considered one vehicle's schedule for one day.) The goal of this research was to develop a systematic tool that can compute all the relevant performance metrics of a run, predict its overall quality, and identify bad runs automatically. This paper presents a methodology that includes a number of performance metrics reflecting the key interests of the stakeholders (e.g., number of passengers per vehicle per hour, deadheading time, passenger wait time, passenger ride time, and degree of zigzagging) and a data-mining tool to fit the metrics to the ratings provided by experienced schedulers. The encouraging preliminary results suggest that the proposed methodology can be easily extended to and implemented in other paratransit organizations to improve efficiency by effectively detecting poor schedules.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lave

R. E.

Teal

and Piras

. TCRP Report 18: A Handbook for Acquiring Demand-Responsive Transit Software. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.

Kessler

D. S.

TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practices 57: Computer-Aided Scheduling and Dispatch in Demand-Responsive Transit Services. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Wilson

N. H. M.

and Colvin

N. H.

. Computer Control of the Rochester Dial-a-Ride System. Report R77-31. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1977.

Bodin

Golden

Assad

and Ball

. Routing and Scheduling of Vehicles and Crews: The State of Art. Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 10, 1983, pp. 69–211.

Jaw

Odoni

Psaraftis

H. N.

and Wilson

N. H. M.

. A Heuristic Algorithm for the Multi-Vehicle Advance Request Dial-a-Ride Problem with Time Windows. Transportation Research, Vol. 20, No. 3 1986, pp. 243–257.

Scheduling Dial-a-Ride Paratransit Under Time-Varying Stochastic Congestion. Transportation Research, Vol. 36, No. 6 2002, pp. 485–506.

Cordeau

J. F.

and Laporte

. The Dial-a-Ride Problem: Models and Algorithms. Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 153, 2007, pp. 29–46.

Pagano

A. M.

Metaxatos

and King

. How Effective Is Computer-Assisted Scheduling and Dispatching in Paratransit? Results from a Survey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1760, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 100–106.

Pagano

A. M.

Metaxatos

and King

. Impact of Computer-Assisted Scheduling and Dispatching Systems on Paratransit Service Quality. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1791, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 51–58.

10.

Yong

and Casello

. Quantifying the Technical Efficiency of Paratransit Systems Using the Data Envelopment Analysis Method. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2034, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 115–122.

11.

Chawla

N. V.

Bowyer

K. W.

Hall

L. O.

and Kegelmeyer

W. P.

. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Vol. 16, 2002, pp. 321–357.

12.

Kubat

and Matwin

. Addressing the Curse of Imbalanced Training Sets: One-Sided Selection. Proc., 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, Nashville, Tenn., 1997, pp. 179–186.

13.

Ling

and Li

. Data Mining for Direct Marketing Problems and Solutions. Proc., 4th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-98), New York, 1998, pp. 73–79.

14.

Hosmer

Jr. and Lemeshow

. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J., 2000.

15.

Miller

Subset Selection in Regression. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 1990.

16.

Ryan

T. P.

Modern Regression Methods. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J., 1997.

17.

SPSS, Inc. home page. www.spss.com.

18.

Breiman

Friedman

Olshen

and Stone

. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 1984.

19.

Loh

W.-Y.

Regression by Parts: Fitting Visually Interpretable Models with GUIDE. In Handbook of Computational Statistics, vol. 3, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008, pp. 447–469.

20.

GUIDE Regression Tree. www.stat.wisc.edu/∼loh/guide.html.

Performance Metrics and Data Mining for Assessing Schedule Qualities in Paratransit

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References