Abstract
In transportation engineering, the network design problem (NDP) aims at finding an optimal link improvement in a network for given demand. Although traffic demand is essentially uncertain, many previous studies assumed it to be deterministic. The demand stochasticity is incorporated and formulas are developed for system-optimal (SO) flow stochastic NDP. The SO assumption is justified by comparing results from SO deterministic NDP with those of user-equilibrium NDP. The difference in social cost between the two approaches is found to be less than 5%. Two two-stage stochastic programs with recourse formulations are proposed: one with penalty function and the other without. The main advantage of the first formulation is that a planner can exert better control on improvement by appropriately weighing reduction in the congestion versus improvement costs. The challenge, however, lies in selecting an appropriate penalty function. A nonlinear penalty function is found suitable for the test network studied. The second formulation does not require penalty function but results in a large number of scenarios. Nonanticipativity constraints are introduced in the second formulation to arrive at uniform improvement over all scenarios. Both formulations are solved on a test network. It is found that necessary improvements and the total costs with both models are more than those for average demand.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
