A stochastic concept for highway capacity analysis is presented. The capacity of a highway facility is regarded as a random variable instead of a constant value. Thus, the stochastic approach provides new measures of traffic flow performance based on aspects of traffic reliability. A method for the estimation of capacity distribution functions from empirical data based on statistical methods for lifetime data analysis is introduced. This method is derived for the analysis of freeway capacity. However, the stochastic approach also is shown to be applicable to intersections. Results of the analysis of data samples from freeway sections in Germany indicate that freeway capacity is Weibull-distributed with a considerable variance. A Monte Carlo technique based on the stochastic description of capacity is proposed to quantify freeway traffic performance over a whole year. This technique also provides a quantitative assessment for oversaturated conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Highway Capacity Manual.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
2.
Handbuch fuer die Bemessung von Strassenverkehrsanlagen.Forschungsgesellschaft fuer Strassen-und Verkehrswesen (FGSV), Cologne, Germany, 2001.
3.
ElefteriadouL., RoessR. P., and McShaneW. R.Probabilistic Nature of Breakdown at Freeway Merge Junctions. In Transportation Research Record 1484, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 80–89.
4.
MinderhoudM. M., BotmaH., and BovyP. H. L.Assessment of Roadway Capacity Estimation Methods. In Transportation Research Record 1572, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 59–67.
5.
PersaudB., YagarS., and BrownleeR.Exploration of the Breakdown Phenomenon in Freeway Traffic. In Transportation Research Record, No. 1634, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 64–69.
6.
KuehneR. D., and AnstettN.Stochastic Methods for Analysis of Traffic Pattern Formation. In Proc., 14th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Jerusalem, Israel, 1999, pp. 177–204.
7.
LorenzM., and ElefteriadouL.A Probabilistic Approach to Defining Freeway Capacity and Breakdown. In Transportation Research Circular E-C018: Fourth International Symposium on Highway Capacity.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 84–95.
8.
OkamuraH., WatanabeS., and WatanabeT.An Empirical Study on the Capacity of Bottlenecks on the Basic Suburban Expressway Sections in Japan. In Transportation Research Circular E-C018: Fourth International Symposium on Highway Capacity.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 120–129.
9.
van AerdeM.A Single Regime Speed–Flow–Density Relationship for Freeways and Arterials. Presented at 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1995.
10.
KellerH., and SachseT.Forschung Strassenbau und Strassenverkehrstechnik No. 614: Einfluss des Bezugsintervalls in Fundamentaldiagrammen auf die zutreffende Beschreibung der Leistungsfaehigkeit von Strassenabschnitten.German Federal Ministry of Transport, Bonn, Germany, 1992.
11.
PonzletM.Dynamik der Leistungsfaehigkeiten von Autobahnen. Doctoral thesis no. 16. Institute for Transportation and Traffic Engineering, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany, 1996.
12.
ZurlindenH.Ganzjahresanalyse des Verkehrsflusses auf Strassen. Doctoral thesis no. 26. Institute for Transportation and Traffic Engineering, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany, 2003.
13.
BrilonW., GeistefeldtJ., and ReglerM.Reliability of Freeway Traffic Flow: A Stochastic Concept of Capacity. Proc., 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, College Park, Md., 2005, pp. 125–144.
14.
van ToorenburgJ.Praktijwaarden Voor de Capaciteit.Rijkswaterstaat dienst Verkeerskunde, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1986.
15.
BanksJ. H.Flow Processes at a Freeway Bottleneck. In Transportation Research Record 1287, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 20–28.
16.
HallF. L., and Agyemang-DuahK.Freeway Capacity Drop and the Definition of Capacity. In Transportation Research Record 1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 91–98.
17.
ReglerM.Verkehrsablauf und Kapazitaet auf Autobahnen. Doctoral thesis no. 28, Institute for Transportation and Traffic Engineering, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany, 2004.
18.
KaplanE. L., and MeierP.Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 53, 1958, pp. 457–481.
19.
LawlessJ. F.Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data.Wiley, New York, 2003.
20.
BrilonW.Traffic Flow Analysis Beyond Traditional Methods. In Transportation Research Circular E-C018: Fourth International Symposium on Highway Capacity.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 26–41.
21.
PinkofskyL.Ganglinientypen. Verkehrsentwicklung auf Bundesfernstrassen 2000—Jahresauswertung der automatischen Dauerzählstellen. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Strassenwesenwesen, No. V99, 2002, pp. 15–32.
22.
GeistefeldtJ.Schaetzung von Reisezeiten auf Autobahnen unter Verwendung eines erweiterten Verkehrsflussmodells. Proc., Conference HEUREKA '05, Cologne, Germany, 2005, pp. 639–651.
23.
KimberR. M., and HollisE. M.TRRL Laboratory Report 909: Traffic Queues and Delays at Road Junctions.Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 1979.
24.
AkcelikR., and TroutbeckR. J.Implementation of the Australian Roundabout Analysis Method in SIDRA. In Highway Capacity and Level of Service: Proc., International Symposium on Highway Capacity.Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1991, pp. 17–34.
