This research focuses on three major challenges of incorporating environmental justice into metropolitan transportation planning. The data needed are compared with the data currently available on the spatial distributions of race and income, the spatial distributions of trip ends, trip tables, network performance, and cost estimates of improvements. Several conflicting definitions of equity are offered, as are applications for each within the context of environmental justice. The importance of choosing a correct unit of analysis is discussed, with particular emphasis on how the geographic unit of analysis is a poor proxy for the group unit, which is theoretically required, as the analysis's purpose is to compare performance measures across groups. The primary goal of this paper is to explore challenging topics such as these raising questions and concerns. The answers to the questions raised will differ depending on each implementing agency's objectives and resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Executive Order 12898. Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations. Federal Register, Vol. 59, 1994, p. 7629 (Section 1–101), 3 C.F.R. §859. Reprinted in 42 U.S.C. §4321.
2.
ForkenbrockD. J. and SchweitzerL. A.. Environmental Justice in Transportation Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 65, 1999, pp. 96–111.
3.
ChakrabortyJ.SchweitzerL. A. and ForkenbrockD. J.. Using GIS to Assess the Environmental Justice Consequences of Transportation System Changes. Transactions in GIS, Vol. 3, 1999, pp. 239–258.
4.
BullardR.JohnsonG. and TorresA.. Highway Robbery: Transportation Racism and New Routes to Equity.South End Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2004.
5.
KainJ. F. and MeyerJ. R.. Transportation and Poverty. Public Interest, Vol. 18, 1970, pp. 75–87.
6.
CollinR. W.BeatleyT. and HarrisW.. Environmental Racism: A Challenge to Community Development. Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 25, No. 31995, pp. 354–376.
7.
LaneL. B.HoffeldS. and GriffinD.. Environmental Justice Evaluation: Wilmington Bypass, Wilmington, North Carolina. In Transportation Research Record 1626, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 131–139.
8.
HodgeD. C.Fiscal Equity in Urban Mass Transit Systems: A Geographic Analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 78, No. 21988, pp. 288–306.
9.
WachsM.U.S. Transit Subsidy Policy: In Need of Reform. Science, Vol. 244, 1989, pp. 1545–1549.
10.
PucherJ.Who Benefits from Transit Subsidies? Recent Evidence from Six Metropolitan Areas. Transportation Research, Vol. 17A, No. 1, 1983, pp. 39–50.
11.
PuentesR. and PrinceR.. Fueling Transportation Finance: A Primer on the Gas Tax.The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., March 2003.
12.
TaylorB.The Geography of Urban Transportation Finance. In The Geography of Urban Transportation, The Guilford Press, New York, 2004.
13.
ShahidullahM. and SmithS. K.. An Evaluation of Population Projection Errors for Census Tracts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 90, 1995, pp. 64–71.
14.
HirschmanC. Race and Ethnic Population Projections: A Critical Evaluation of Their Content and Meaning. Presented at 13th SUNY—Albany Conference on American Diversity: A Demographic Challenge for the Twenty-First Century, Albany, N.Y., 1994.
15.
SmithS. K. and NogleJ. M.. An Evaluation of Hispanic Population Estimates. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 85, No. 32004, pp. 731–745.
16.
PurvisC. L.Data and Analysis Methods for Metropolitan-Level Environmental Justice Assessment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1756, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 15–21.
17.
Cambridge Systematics, Inc.Technical Methods to Support Analysis of Environmental Justice Issues. Final report for NCHRP Project 8–36(11). TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002.
18.
DekaD.Social and Environmental Justice Issues in Urban Transportation. In The Geography of Urban Transportation, Guilford Press, New York, 2004.
19.
TaylorB.The Geography of Urban Transportation Finance. In The Geography of Urban Transportation, Guilford Press, New York, 2004.
20.
LitmanT.Evaluating Transportation Equity: Guidance for Incorporating Distributional Impacts on Transportation Planning.Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2006.
21.
KhistyC. J.Operationalizing Concepts of Equity for Public Project Investments. In Transportation Research Record 1559, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 94–99.
22.
LeeD. B.Making the Concept of Equity Operational. In Transportation Research Record 677, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 48–53.
23.
BurbankC. J. and AdamsC.. Status of Environmental Justice Activities. Memorandum to FHWA Division Administrators and FTA Regional Administrators, Jan. 19, 2000.
LevinsonD.Identifying Winners and Losers in Transportation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1812, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 179–185.
27.
ConnorsR.SumaleeA. and WatlingD.. Equitable Network Design. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, 2005, pp. 1382–1397.
