This paper provides complete guidelines for using geosynthetics with hot-mix asphalt overlays to reduce reflective cracking. Definitions of the various types of geosynthetics that are commercially available along with some of their advantages and disadvantages are also provided. These guidelines address the following: when to consider a geosynthetic product, how to select and store geosynthetics, cost considerations, pavement design with a geosynthetic, overlay construction with a geosynthetic, construction inspection, and potential construction problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HoltzR. D., ChristopherB. R., and BergR. R.Geosynthetic Design and Construction Guidelines. FHWA HI-95-038. NHI Course No. 13213, National Highway Institute, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.
2.
LyttonR. L.Use of Geotextiles for Reinforcement and Strain Relief in Asphaltic Concrete. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 8, 1989, pp. 217–237.
3.
BarksdaleR. D.NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 171: Fabrics in Asphalt Overlays and Pavement Maintenance.TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991.
4.
McKeenR. G., and LyttonR. L.Development of a Generic Specification for Reinforcing Fabrics.New Mexico Engineering Research Institute, New Mexico State Highway Department, Santa Fe, 1982.
5.
AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures.AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1993.
6.
Issues Mount Over Paving Fabric Usage.Better Roads, Vol. 70, No. 3, 2000, pp. 17–20.
7.
FlynnL.The Waterproofing Debate. Roads & Bridges, March 2000, pp. 48–53.
8.
MarienfeldM. L., and BakerT. L.Transportation Research Circular E-C006: Paving Fabric Interlayer as a Pavement Moisture Barrier, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1999.
9.
ButtonJ. W.Overlay Construction and Performance Using Geotextiles. Transportation Research Record 1248, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 24–33.
10.
Pavement Rehabilitation Manual, Pavement Division. Office of Highway Operations, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1982.
11.
ButtonJ. W., and EppsJ. A.Evaluation of Fabric Interlayers. Report 261-2. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, 1983.
12.
Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Studies. SHRP/LTPP/FR-90-001. SHRP, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990.
13.
PickettD. L., and LyttonR. L.Laboratory Evaluation of Selected Fabrics for Reinforcement of Asphalt Concrete Overlays. FHWA-TX-84+261-1. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, 1983.
14.
BrewerW. B.Jr.Sand Anti-Fracture Mixture: I-35 Logan County. Report No. 213. Research, Development & Technology Transfer, Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Oklahoma City, 1997.
15.
ButtonJ. W., EppsJ. A., and LyttonR. L.Laboratory Evaluation of Fabrics for Reducing Reflection Cracking. Interim Report RF 3424-5. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, 1983.
MarienfeldM. L., and BakerT. L.Field Installation Guidelines for Paving Fabrics.Fabrics & Fibers Business Unit, Amoco Fabrics and Fibers Company, Austell, Ga., 2001.
18.
Guidelines for Quality Control in Pavement Reinforcing Fabric Installation.California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 1981.
