Using Global Positioning System Data to Understand Day-to-Day Dynamics of Morning Commute Behavior

Abstract

The day-to-day variability of journey-to-work trips, including departure time, route choice, and trip-chaining behavior, was examined with Global Positioning System-based disaggregate morning commute data for 56 drivers during a 1-week period. Data were collected from the ongoing instrumented vehicle projects in Atlanta sponsored by NHTSA and FHWA. The study examines alternative measurements of the day-to-day variability of the commute pattern. While commuting trips are often thought to be highly repetitious and therefore highly predictable trips, research results indicate that commuters change departure times more frequently than routes, and trip chaining significantly affects commuters' departure time and route choice behavior. This study begins to explore definitions and relationships that will be necessary to better understand the day-to-day commute dynamics.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jones

, and Clarke

. The Significance and Measurement of Variability in Travel Behavior. Transportation, Vol. 15, 1988, pp. 65–87.

Mahmassani

Dynamics of Commuter Behavior: Recent Research and Continuing Challenges. In Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change ( Stopher

and Lee-Gosselin

, eds.), Pergamon-Elsevier Science, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997, pp. 279–314.

Mahmassani

, Hatcher

, and Caplice

. Daily Variation of Trip Chaining, Scheduling and Path Selection Behavior of Work Commuters. In Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change ( Stopher

and Lee-Gosselin

, eds.), Pergamon-Elsevier Science, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997, pp. 351–380.

Pendyala

Measuring Day-to-Day Variability in Travel Behavior Using GPS Data. Final Report DTFH61-99-P-00266. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1999.

Nishii

, Kondo

, and Kitamura

. Empirical Analysis of Trip Chaining Behavior. In Transportation Research Record 1203, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 48–59.

Davidson

Impact of Suburban Employee Trip Chaining on Transportation Demand Management. In Transportation Research Record 1321, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 82–89.

Yalamanchili

, Pendyala

, Prabaharan

, and Chakravarthy

. Analysis of Global Positioning System-Based Data Collection Methods for Capturing Multistop Trip-Chaining Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1660, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 58–65.

Hanson

The Importance of the Multi-Purpose Journey to Work in Urban Travel Behavior. Transportation, Vol. 9, 1980, pp. 229–248.

Bianco

, and Lawson

. Trip Chaining, Childcare, and Personal Safety. Proc., 2nd National Women's Travel Issues Conference, Baltimore, Md., Oct. 1996, p p. 124.

10.

Orski

A Realistic Appraisal of Traffic Congestion. Urban Land, Oct. 1989, p p. 35.

11.

Strathman

, and Dueker

. Understanding Trip Chaining. NPTS Special Reports on Trip and Vehicle Attributes. Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1990, pp. 1–7.

12.

Mannering

F. L.

Poisson Analysis of Commuter Flexibility in Changing Routes and Departure Times. Transportation Research B, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1989, pp. 53–60.

13.

Pas

E. I.

, and Koppelman

F. S.

. An Examination of the Determinants of Day-to-Day Variability in Individuals' Urban Travel Behavior. Transportation, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1987, pp. 183–200.

14.

Hanson

, and Huff

. Classification Issues in the Analysis of Complex Travel Behavior. Transportation, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1986, pp. 271–293.