Trade-Offs Between Time,Cost,and Uncertainty by Commuters in Hyderabad,India: Stated Preference Survey Assessment

Abstract

In developing countries, air quality assessments that include the transportation sector have tended to focus predominantly on assessing technological solutions to problems associated with vehicle pollutant emissions, energy consumption, and greenhouse gases. This focus can be justified on the basis of the favorable cost-effectiveness, political acceptance, and ease of quantifying technological measures—at least in the short term—but unfortunately it often leads to the exclusion of demand-oriented measures. Further, air quality and pollution policy analysts often use assumptions of exogenously determined travel demand patterns, implicitly excluding many opportunities to look at policies oriented toward travel demand as an air pollution control strategy. The air quality impacts of policy measures to influence vehicle kilometers traveled and mode shares, such as bus rapid transit, are investigated. The approach involves developing coefficients with a stated preference (SP) survey that could be used to test policies with a conventional four-step urban transportation model. The main purpose of the SP survey in this study was to examine traveler tradeoffs among time, cost, and reliability (measured as uncertainty in vehicle departure time). Some different methods of measuring reliability were tested during the pilot phase of the survey, as were the actual range of parameter values to be tested. Models were estimated using traveler cohorts based on levels of vehicle ownership. In comparing vehicle owners (cars and two-wheelers) with nonowners, owners were found to be substantially more sensitive to time and reliability while nonowners were more sensitive to price. All groups showed notable sensitivity to reliability. Policy implications of these results are discussed, with a notable conclusion being that demand-oriented measures appear to be a fruitful area for further investigation as air pollution control strategies, even when technological measures show strong effectiveness.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Shah

, and Nagpal

(eds.). Urban Air Quality Management Strategy in Asia. Kathmandu Valley Report, Jakarta Report, Metro Manila Report, and Greater Mumbai Report. World Bank Technical Papers, No. 378-381. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Vehicular Air Pollution: Setting Priorities. South Asia Urban Air Quality Management Briefing Note No. 1. World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2001.

Rogers

Assessment of the Pollution Under Control Program in India and Recommendations for Improvement. South Asia Urban Air Quality Management Program, World Bank, 2002.

Yedla

Analyses of Technical Options for Mitigating Environmental Emissions from the Urban Transport Systems in India. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India, 1992.

How Can Urban Bus Policy Reduce Air Pollution? South Asia Urban Air Quality Management Briefing Note No. 3. World Bank, 2001.

Deb

Mitigation Options in the Indian Transport Sector. Presentation to The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), New Delhi, India, 2002.

Bose

, and Sperling

. Transportation in Developing Countries: Greenhouse Gas Scenarios for Delhi, India. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2001.

Air Pollution from Ground Transportation. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York, 2002.

Cities on the Move: A World Bank Urban Transport Strategy Review. World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2002.

10.

Hensher

D. A.

Stated Preference Analysis of Travel Choices: The State of Practice. In Transport Economics: Selected Readings. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1997, pp. 81–109.

11.

Bus Rapid Transit Spreads to Africa and Asia. In Sustainable Transport, No. 15, Fall, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, New York, 2003, pp. 4–11.