The development of innovative systems for rail and maritime terminals is an issue high on the agenda of the transport industry. In Europe, a number of new transport systems for unitized cargoes are already in the mature design or pilot phase. A study was done to present a subset of these systems for which pilot demonstrations exist, to identify the basic directions of the relevant technological research and to evaluate the effects of these systems on the structural and operational environment of the terminals. The relevant analysis was based on the experience extracted by field trials as well as by modeling tasks used for the evaluation of the related terminal performance. It was revealed that tasks such as the reduction of terminal access time, fast train loading and unloading, and achievement of high degrees in equipment automation are technically and operationally feasible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Future Optimum Terminals for Intermodal Transport. Doc. Euret/411/95. SIMET Research Project: Smart Intermodal European Transfer. Project Reference: 81012201. European Commission, DG Transport, Brussels, Belgium, Aug. 1995www.cordis.luAccessed June 2004.
2.
New-Generation Terminal and Terminal-Node Concepts in Europe. Deliverable D2. TERMINET Research Project: Towards a New Generation of Networks and Terminals for Multimodal Freight Transport. Project Reference: IN-96-SC.1204. European Commission, DG Transport, Brussels, Belgium, July1997, pp. 85-88www.cordis.luAccessed June 2004.
3.
ITIP Research Project: Innovative Technologies for Intermodal Transfer Points. Ongoing Project, Contract No. 2000-AM.10005. European Commission, DG TREN, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
4.
Maritime Terminals and Harbor Economic at Interfaces with Intermodal Transports. Deliverable D1, Report 1.3.3. IQ Research Project: Intermodal Quality. Project Reference: IN-95-SC.0313. European Commission, DG TREN, Brussels, Belgium, 1997www.cordis.luAccessed June 2004.
5.
Advanced Handling (Transshipment, Internal Transport, and Storage). Deliverable D8. IMPULSE Research Project: Interoperable Modular Plans Underlying Logistic System in Europe. Project Reference: IN-95-SC.0255. European Commission, DG TREN, Brussels, Belgium, 1998www.cordis.luAccessed June 2004.
6.
White Paper: European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, L-2985. European Commission, Luxembourg, 2001europea.eu.int/comm/energy_transport/en/lb_en.htmlAccessed June 2004.
7.
Users' Needs for a Future Fleet Management. Deliverable D3. F-MAN Research Project: Rail Car Asset Management. Project Reference: IST-2000-29542. European Commission, DG INFSO, Brussels, Belgium, 2002www.fman.orgAccessed June 2004.
8.
Glossary for Transport Statistics. Document Prepared by the Intersecretariat Working Group on Transport Statistics (IWG. Trans: EUROSTAT, ECMT, UNECE), 3rd ed. United Nationswww1.oecd.org/cem/online/glossaries
9.
BallisA., and GoliasJ.. Comparative Evaluation of Existing and Innovative Rail-Road Freight Transport Terminals. Transportation Research A, Vol. 36, 2002, pp. 593–611.
10.
Design and Organizational Aspects of Intermodal Transport Terminals. Deliverable D11, Chapter 4: Intermodal Terminal Design—Examples and Reasoning. IMPULSE Research Project: Interoperable Modular Pilot Plans Underlying Logistic System in Europe. Project Reference: IN-95-SC.0255. European Commission, DG TREN, Brussels, Belgium, 1999www.cordis.luAccessed June 2004.
11.
RueschM., and RAPP Ltd. Engineers and Planners. Standardization Related to Transfer Points. Presented at EUTP Clustering Meeting, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Dec.12, 2002.
12.
Design and Organizational Aspects of Intermodal Transport Terminals. Deliverable D11, Section 5.1.3: Advanced Rail Access Techniques/Systems. IMPULSE Research Project: Interoperable Modular Pilot Plans Underlying Logistic System in Europe. Project Reference: IN-95-SC.0255. European Commission, DG Transport, Brussels, Belgium, 1999, pp. 92-96www.cordis.luAccessed June 2004.
13.
Design and Organizational Aspects of Intermodal Transport Terminals. Deliverable D11, Section 4.9: Advanced Rail Access Techniques/Systems. IMPULSE Research Project: Interoperable Modular Pilot Plans Underlying Logistic System in Europe. Project Reference: IN-95-SC.0255. European Commission, DG Transport, Brussels, Belgium, 1999, pp. 84-44www.cordis.luAccessed June 2004.
14.
Noell Crane Systems GmbH, MegaHub-Intermodal Transport Systems of the Future, Noell, Wuerzburg, Germany1999www.noellcranesystems.comAccessed June 2004.
15.
IoannouP. A., JulaH., LiuC.-I., VukadinovicK., PourmohammadiH., and DoughertyE.Jr.Advanced Material Handling: Automated Guided Vehicles in Agile Ports. Final Report of the Programme. Supported by the Center for Commercial Deployment of Transportation Technologies, University of Southern California, Center for Advanced Transportation Technologies, revised Jan. 2001www.usc.edu/dept/ee/catt/2002/jula/MarineAccessed June 2004.
16.
MorlokE. K., and SpasovicL. N.. Redesigning Rail-Truck Intermodal Drayage Operations for Enhanced Service and Cost Performance. Journal of Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1994, pp. 6–31.
17.
ResorR. R., and BlazeJ. R.. Short-Haul Rail Intermodal: Can It Compete with Trucks? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1873, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 45–52.
18.
Industry Expects Major Impact as New Driver Hours Rules Go into Effect. IANA Intermodal Insights, Vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 1-2, 4–6.
19.
NieratP.Market Area of Rail-Truck Terminals: Pertinence of the Spatial Theory. Transportation Research A, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1997, pp. 109–128.
20.
MorlokE. K., and SammonJ. P.Summary of Research Results in University of Pennsylvania Study on Reducing Intermodal Drayage Costs and Improving Service Quality on Conrail. University of Pennsylvania and Consolidated Rail Corp., June1990www.seas.upenn.edu/sys/morlokpage/Drayage.pdfAccessed June 2004.
21.
MorlokE. K., SammonJ. P., SpasovicL. N., and NozickL. K.. Improving Productivity in Intermodal Rail-Truck Transportation. In The Service Productivity and Quality Challenge (HarkerP. T., ed.), Kluwer, London, 1995, pp. 407–434.
22.
SinclairM., and Van DykE.. Combined Routing and Scheduling for the Transportation of Containerized Cargo. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 38, No. 6, 1987, pp. 3–17.
23.
Report on the Current State of Combined Transport in Europe. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Paris, April1998.
24.
BallisA., and GoliasJ.. Towards the Optimization of a Combined Transport Chain Performance. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 152, No. 2, Jan.16, 2004, pp. 420–436.
