Freeway Weaving: Comparison of Highway Capacity Manual 2000 and Dutch Guidelines

Abstract

Weaving sections are a commonly adopted freeway facility both in the United States and in Europe. Knowledge about the capacity and level of service achievable on different types of weaving segments is necessary for the design and management of freeways. Guidelines such as those of the U.S. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) provide capacity values for different weaving configuration types. The Dutch guidelines for the design of weaving segments are compared with those of the U.S. HCM. Differences between their respective approaches are identified, and a comparison of capacity values is conducted. It was found that there are large differences in capacity estimates for certain weaving configuration types. The results of a sensitivity analysis explain these differences in capacity values to a large extent. This analysis showed that it is important to consider the weaving proportions per leg. Currently, neither the HCM nor the Dutch approach considers different weaving flows per incoming leg. The introduction of an additional variable into the calculation procedure that takes into account the presence of asymmetrical weaving flows is recommended.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Capaciteitswaarden Infrastructuur Autosnelwegen (Capacity Values of Freeway Facilities) (in Dutch). Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Adviesdienst Verkeer en Vervoer, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1999.

Dijker

, and Minderhoud

M. M.

. CIA-2: Deelonderzoek CAPWEEF Fase 2: Het Bepalen van de Capaciteit van Asymmetrische Weefvakken Met Simulatie (Capacity Estimation of Asymmetrical Weaving Sections Using Micro Simulation) (in Dutch). Report vk2001.008. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2001.

Highway Capacity Manual (metric version). TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

Vermijs

R. G. G. M.

New Dutch Standards for Weaving Sections Based on Microscopic Simulation. In Proc., 3rd International Symposium on Highway Capacity ( Rysgaard

, ed.), Copenhagen, 1998.

Brilon

Verfahren für die Berechnung der Leistungsfähigkeit und Qualität des Verkehrsablaufes auf Strassen. Bundesminister für Verkehr, Bonn, Germany, 1993.

Stander

, and Tichaur

. Evaluation of Weaving on Freeways with Sub-Standard Geometric Characteristics. In Proc., 3rd International Symposium on Highway Capacity ( Rysgaard

, ed.), Copenhagen, Denmark, 1998.

Lertworawanich

, and Elefteriadou

. Capacity Estimations for Type B Weaving Areas Based on Gap Acceptance. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1776, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 24–34.

Lertworawanich

, and Elefteriadou

. A Methodology for Estimating Capacity at Ramp Weaves Based on Gap Acceptance and Linear Optimization. Transportation Research, Vol. 37B, No. 5, 2003, pp. 459–483.

Roess

R. P.

Development of Weaving Area Analysis Procedures for the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. In Transportation Research Record 1112, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 17–22.

10.

Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.

11.

Minderhoud

M. M.

, and Kirwan

. Validatie FOSIM voor Asymmetriche Weefvakken: CAPWEEF Fase 1 (Validation of FOSIM for Asymmetric Weaving Sections) (in Dutch). Report vk 2001.007. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2001.