The framework of a traffic prediction model that could eliminate noise caused by random travel conditions is investigated. This model also can quantitatively calculate the influence of special factors. The framework combined several artificial intelligence technologies, such as wavelet transform, neural network, and fuzzy logic. The wavelet denoising method is emphasized and analyzed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FargeM., and PhilipovitchT.Coherent Structure Analysis and Extraction Using Wavelets. In Progress in Wavelet Analysis and Applications. Éditions Frontières, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1993.
2.
WernikA. W., and GrzesiakM.Proc., International Symposium, Plasma 97, Jarnoltowek, Poland, Vol. 1, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1997, p. 391.
3.
AdeliH., and KarimA.Fuzzy-Wavelet RBFNN Model for Freeway Incident Detection. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 6, 2000, pp. 464–471.
4.
IshakS. S., and Al-DeekH. M.Fuzzy ART Neural Network Model for Automated Detection of Freeway Incidents. In Transportation Research Record 1634, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 56–63.
5.
XuH., KwanC. M., HaynesL., and PryorJ. D.Real-Time Adaptive On-Line Traffic Incident Detection. Proc., International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Piscataway, N.J., IEEE, 1996, pp. 200–205.
6.
AdorniG., CagnoniS., GoriM., and MordoniniM.Access Control System with Neuro-Fuzzy Supervision. Proc., Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE, 2001, pp. 472–477.
7.
ChouJ., O’NeillW. A., and ChengH.Pavement Distress Evaluation Using Fuzzy Logic and Moment Invariants. In Transportation Research Record 1505, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 39–46.
8.
HayashiK., ShimizuY., DoteY., TakayamaA., and HirakoA.Neuro Fuzzy Transmission Control for Automobile with Variable Loads. Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1995, pp. 49–52.
9.
JouI. C., ChangC. J., and ChenH. K.Hybrid Neuro-Fuzzy System for Adaptive Vehicle Separation Control. Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image, and Video Technology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1999, pp. 15–29.
10.
LiuJ. N. K.Fuzzy Neural Networks for Machine Maintenance in Mass Transit Railway System. Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1997, pp. 932–941.
11.
SayedT., and RazaviA.Comparison of Neural and Conventional Approaches to Mode Choice Analysis. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2000, pp. 23–30.
12.
TaylorC., and MeldrumD.Freeway Traffic Data Prediction via Artificial Neural Networks for Use in a Fuzzy Logic Ramp Metering Algorithm. Proc., Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Piscataway, N.J., IEEE, 1994, pp. 308–313.
13.
VukadinovicK., TeodorovicD., and PavkovicG.Application of Neuro-fuzzy Modeling: The Vehicle Assignment Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 114, No. 3, 1999, pp. 474–488.
14.
DoughertyM., KirbyH., and BoyleR. D.Using Neural Networks to Recognize, Predict, and Model Traffic. In Artificial Intelligence Applications to Traffic Engineering (BielliM., AmbrosioG., and BoeroM., eds.), VSP, Zeist, Netherlands, 1994, pp. 235–250.
15.
LedouxC.An Urban Traffic Flow Model Integrating Neural Network. Transportation Research C, Vol. 5, 1997, pp. 287–300.
16.
YinH., WongS. C., XuJ., and WongC. K.Urban Traffic Flow Prediction Using a Fuzzy-Neural Approach. Transportation Research C, Vol. 10, 2002, pp. 85–98.
17.
YuanZ., LiW., and LiuH.Forecast of Dynamic Traffic Flow. Proc., Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies, Reston, Va., ASCE, 2000, pp. 507–512.
18.
DonohoD. L., and JohnstoneI. M.Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 90, No. 432, 1224, pp. 1200–1224.
