A second-best traffic demand management policy, cordon tolls, is considered. Double cordons are simulated for seven English towns. It is found that a second, outer cordon implemented jointly with an inner cordon surrounding the city center enhances the increase in social welfare in comparison with a single inner cordon. Although other social and political considerations such as potential revenues and distributional effects may persuade policy makers to implement higher or lower charges, a method is proposed for deciding on the optimal combination of tolls, which is defined as the combination that maximizes the increase in social welfare for a given cordon location, social welfare being equal to the sum of individual utilities minus the sum of individual costs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SantosG.Road Pricing on the Basis of Congestion Costs: Consistent Results from Two Historic U.K. Towns. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1732, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 25–31.
2.
SantosG., and NewberyD.Urban Congestion Charging: Theory, Practice and Environmental Consequences. Working Paper 568. Center for Economic Studies and the Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich, 2001.
3.
MunS., KonishiK., and YoshikawaK.Optimal Cordon Pricing. Presented at the 9th World Conference on Transport Research (Paper 3425), Seoul, July2001.
4.
ShepherdS., MayT., and MilneD.The Design of Optimal Road Pricing Cordons. Presented at the 9th World Conference on Transport Research (Paper 3432), Seoul, Korea, July2001.
5.
VerhoefE.Algorithms for Finding Second-Best Optimal Toll Levels and Toll Points. Presented at the 9th World Conference on Transport Research (Paper 3402), Seoul, Korea, July2001.
6.
O’MahonyM., and BlytheP.Charging for Road Use. Presented at the 9th World Conference on Transport Research (Paper 3442), Seoul, Korea, July 2001.
Port Authority To Add Dedicated E-zpass Toll Lanes at George Washington Bridge—Use of Electronic Toll Collection at World’s Busiest Bridge Rising, Feb.16, 2001. http://www.panynj.gov/pr/pressrelease.php3?id=59. Accessed Nov. 11, 2001.
9.
PhangS., and TohR.From Manual to Electronic Road Congestion Pricing: The Singapore Experience and Experiment. Transport Research (Logistics and Transport Review), Vol. 33E, No. 2, 1997, pp. 97–106.
10.
ClarkJ.No Free Ways About It. ITS International, Jan.–Feb.2000, pp. 32–33.
SantosG., NewberyD., and RojeyL.Static Versus Demand-Sensitive Models and Estimation of Second-Best Cordon Tolls: An Exercise for Eight English Towns. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1747, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 44–50.
13.
Van VlietD., and HallM.SATURN 9.3 User Manual. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, 1997.
14.
Highways Economics Note No. 2. In Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Vol. 13, Highways Agency, Scottish Office Development Department, The Welsh Office, The Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland, and the Department of Transport, London, 1996.
15.
MilneD., and Van VlietD.Implementing Road User Charging in SATURN. ITS Working Paper 410. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, 1993.
16.
SantosG., RojeyL., and NewberyD.The Environmental Benefits from Road Pricing. DAE Working Paper 0020. Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge University, Dec.2000.
17.
GoodwinP.A Review of New Demand Elasticities with Reference to Short and Long Run Effects to Price Changes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1992, pp. 155–169.
18.
OumT. H., WatersW. G.II, and YongJ.-S.Concepts of Price Elasticities of Transport Demand and Recent Empirical Estimates. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1992, pp. 139–154.
19.
FowkesA. S., SherwoodN., and NashC. A.Segmentation of the Travel Market in London: Estimates of Elasticities and Values of Travel Time. Working Paper 345. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, May1993.
20.
Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Transportation Elasticities. In Traffic Demand Management (TDM) Encyclopedia, 2000. http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm11.htm. Accessed Dec. 14, 2000.
21.
VerhoefE., and SmallK.Product Differentiation on Roads: Constrained Congestion Pricing with Heterogenous Users. Discussion Paper TI 99-066/3. Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam-Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1999.
