Estimating Agency Cost of Maintenance,Repair,and Rehabilitation for Florida Bridges

Abstract

The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) recently conducted a study to develop agency cost factors for maintenance, rehabilitation, and repair (MR&R) of bridges, for the state’s implementation of the AASHTOWare Pontis® Bridge Management System. The study analyzed three information systems on maintenance and construction history available at the FDOT. Pontis defines many combinations of bridge element, environment, condition, and feasible action, resulting in more unit cost values than can be estimated from the available data. To simplify cost determination, a classification scheme (MR&R Action Sub-category) was devised to group the Pontis combinations. Statistical analysis was performed on the raw cost data to extract useful numbers from the available data sources. The results were supplemented with the judgment of an FDOT panel of experts. Although the panel found the analysis of historical data to be useful for 70% of the actions considered, only 50% of the actions had a statistically significant sample, and only 15% were usable directly from a statistical analysis. The main issues were differences in data collection units and differences or uncertainties in the scope of recorded actions. The study recommended improvements in the automated systems to enhance the ability to use the data in future updates of the agency cost model.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Thompson

P. D.

, and Markow

M. J.

. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 227: Collecting and Managing Cost Data for Bridge Management Systems. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.

Wipf

T. J.

, Erickson

D. L.

, and Klaiber

F. W.

. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Strengthening Existing Bridges. In Transportation Research Record 1113, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 9–17.

James

R. W.

, Stukhart

, Mcfarland

F. W.

, and Garcia-Diaz

. Proposed Bridge Management System Implementation Plan for Texas. Technical Report No. FHWA-TX-92/1259-1F. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1993.

Gannon

E. J.

, Weyers

R. E.

, and Cady

P. D.

. Cost Relationships for Concrete Bridge Protection, Repair, and Rehabilitation. In Transportation Research Record 1490, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 32–42.

Abed-Al-Rahim

I. J.

, and Johnston

D. W.

. Bridge Replacement Cost Analysis Procedures. In Transportation Research Record 1490, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 23–31.

Van Lund

J. A.

Bridge Bearing Replacement. In Conference Proceedings 7, Fourth International Bridge Engineering Conference, Vol. 2. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995.

Elzarka

, Bell

, and Sanders

. Cost Data Generation for the PONTIS Bridge Management System. Research Final Report and DAGS User Manual. Department of Civil Engineering, Clemson University, S.C., 1996.

Chengalur-Smith

I. N.

, Ballou

D. P.

, and Pazer

H. L.

. Modeling the Costs of Bridge Rehabilitation. Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 31, No. 4, July 1997, pp. 281–293.

Appleman

B. R.

NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 251: Lead-Based Paint Removal for Steel Highway Bridges. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997.

10.

Adams

T. M.

, and Sianipar

P. R.

. Sensitivity of Network Level BMS MR&R Policies to Variations in Cost, Transition Probability, and Discount Factor. In Transportation Research Record 1642, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 1–10.

11.

Adams

T. M.

, and Barut

J. F.

. Establishing MR&R Costs for a Network-Level Bridge Management System. In Transportation Research Record 1642, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 11–20.

12.

Gannon

E. J.

A Life-Cycle Cost Model for Use in the Optimization of Concrete Bridge Deck Repair and Rehabilitation. Ph.D. dissertation. Pennsylvania State University, State College, 1998.

13.

Ghaeli

M. R.

Pavement and Bridge Cost Allocation Analysis of the Ontario Intercity Highway Network. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1998.

14.

Ludescher

, and Hajdin

. Distinctive Features of the Swiss Road Structures Management System. In Transportation Research Circular 498: Presentations from the 8th International Bridge Management Conference, Vol. 2. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., April 1999, pp. F-1/1–17.

15.

Thompson

P. D.

, Merlo

, Kerr

, Cheetham

, and Ellis

. The New Ontario Bridge Management System. In Transportation Research Circular 498: Presentations from the 8th International Bridge Management Conference, Vol. 2. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., April 1999, pp. F-6/1–15.

16.

Sobanjo

J. O.

, and Thompson

D. P.

. Development of Agency Maintenance, Repair, and Rehabilitation (MR&R) Cost Data for Florida Bridge Management System. Draft Final Report. Florida State University, Tallahassee, 2001.