Percent Time-Spent-Following as Performance Measure for Two-Lane Highways

Abstract

The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) uses percent time-spent-following (PTSF) as the primary level-of-service (LOS) measure for two-lane highways. On Class I highways, average travel speed is used as an auxiliary measure. The new HCM provides methods for both twoway and directional estimation of PTSF, although the methods are not totally compatible. On Finnish two-lane highways, PTSF is lower than that estimated by the HCM 2000 methodology. Also, the impact of directional distribution is greater, whereas the impact of no-passing zones is less. From the beginning of the motorized transportation era, traffic engineers have searched for methods to define the traffic capacity of highways. Capacity estimation is not enough, however; traffic engineers and road users are both interested in the quality of traffic flow. After almost a century, this search is not yet over. In fact, transportation telematics has increased the need for reliable descriptions of quality traffic flow by using performance measures and concepts that are easily understood by road users. Several performance and service measures (to assign a LOS) suggested for two-lane highways are discussed. The properties of PTSF are discussed in more detail because PTSF has been the most important service measure for two-lane highways since HCM 1985. The estimation of PTSF and its adjustment for prevailing conditions in HCM 2000 are compared by the use of data from Finland. Finally, the applicability of PTSF as a service measure is evaluated against a set of qualifications.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Committee on Highway Capacity, Department of Traffic and Operations, Highway Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual: Practical Applications of Research. Bureau of Public Roads, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1950.

Kittelson

W. K.

Historical Overview of the Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service. In Transportation Research Circular E-C018: Fourth International Symposium on Highway Capacity. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 5–16.

Normann

O. K.

Results of Highway Capacity Studies. Public Roads, Vol. 23, No. 4, June 1942, pp. 57–81.

Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual, 3rd ed. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.

Wardrop

J. G.

Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 1, 1952, pp. 325–378.

Morrall

J. F.

, and Werner

. Measuring Level of Service of Two-Lane Highways by Overtakings. In Transportation Research Record 1287, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 62–69.

Greenshields

B. D.

, George

H. P.

, Guerin

N. S.

, Palmer

M. R.

, and Underwood

R. T.

. Quality and Theory of Traffic Flow. Bureau of Highway Traffic, Yale University, New Haven, Conn., 1961.

Drew

D. R.

Traffic Flow Theory and Control. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.

Special Report 87: Highway Capacity Manual, 2nd ed. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1965.

10.

Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

11.

Brilon

Traffic Flow Analysis Beyond Traditional Methods. In Transportation Research Circular E-C018: Fourth International Symposium on Highway Capacity. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 26–41.

12.

Harwood

D. W.

, May

A. D.

, Anderson

I. B.

, Leiman

, and Archilla

A. R.

. Capacity and Quality of Service of Two-Lane Highways. NCHRP Final Report. Midwest Research Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 1999.

13.

Botma

Traffic Operation on Busy Two-Lane Rural Roads in the Netherlands. In Transportation Research Record 1091, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 126–131.

14.

Guell

D. L.

, and Virkler

M. R.

. Capacity Analysis of Two-Lane Highways. In Transportation Research Record 1194, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 199–205.

15.

Luttinen

R. T.

Statistical Properties of Vehicle Time Headways. In Transportation Research Record 1365, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 92–98.

16.

Brilon

, Großmann

, and Blanke

. Verfahren für die Berechnung der Leistungsfähigkeit und Qualität des Verkehrablaufes auf Straßen. Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik, Heft 669. Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bonn, Germany, 1994.

17.

De Arazoza

R. D.

, and McLeod

D. S.

. Methodology to Assess Level of Service on US-1 in the Florida Keys. In Transportation Research Record 1398, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 1–6.

18.

Luoma

, and Jaatinen

. Matka-Aikojen Ennustettavuus Päätieverkon Tärkeimmillä Yhteysväleillä (in Finnish). Internal Publications of the Finnish Road Administration, Tielaitoksen Sisäisiä Julkaisuja 1/1999. Tielaitos, Helsinki, Finland, 1999.

19.

Persaud

, Look

, and Tamburro

. Relating Safety to Capacity and Level of Service for Two-Lane Rural Roads. Presented at 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.

20.

Madanat

S. M.

, Cassidy

M. J.

, and Ibrahim

W.-H. W.

. Methodology for Determining Level of Service Categories Using Attitudinal Data. In Transportation Research Record 1457, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 59–62.

21.

Kita

Level-of-Service Measure of Road Traffic Based on the Driver’s Perception. In Transportation Research Circular E-C018: Fourth International Symposium on Highway Capacity. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 53–62.

22.

Kiljunen

, and Summala

. Liikenteen Sujuvuuden Kokeminen Kaksikaistaisilla Teillä eri Ajo-oloissa (in Finnish). Tielaitoksen Selvityksiä 9/1998. Tielaitos, Helsinki, Finland, 1998.

23.

Pécheux

K. K.

, Pietrucha

M. T.

, and Jovanis

P. P.

. User Perception of Level of Service at Signalized Intersections: Methodological Issues. In Transportation Research Circular E-C018: Fourth International Symposium on Highway Capacity. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 322–335.

24.

Luttinen

R. T.

Level of Service on Finnish Two-Lane Highways. In Transportation Research Circular E-C018: Fourth International Symposium on Highway Capacity. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 175–187.

25.

Brilon

Queueing Model of Two-Lane Rural Traffic. Transportation Research, Vol. 11, 1977, pp. 95–107.

26.

Heidemann

A Theoretical Model for Distributions of Speeds and Time-Headways on Two-Lane Roads. In Transportation and Traffic Theory, Proc., 12th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory ( Daganzo

C. F.

, ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1993, pp. 523–537.